A laser-Doppler anemometer (LDA) was used to measure turbulent velocities in drag-reducing fibre suspensions. Measurements of streamwise velocities (and, in one case, the circumferential velocity as well) were made in flow through a straight pipe at x/d = 190, and at Reynolds numbers in the range 1.4 × 104–5.3 × 104. The fibres used were chrysotile asbestos of high aspect ratio (∼ 106), at a concentration of 300 w.p.p.m. They were dispersed in an aqueous solution of a surfactant (0.5% by weight Aerosol OT). In some experiments, the fibre suspensions were supplemented by a drag-reducing polymer (Separan AP30) at a concentration of 150 w.p.p.m. A complete experiment involved passing a quantity of fibre suspension through the apparatus a number of times (at a given Reynolds number) and measuring the velocity distribution across the pipe during each pass. As the amount of drag reduction generally declined with the number of passes (i.e. due to fibre degradation), this provided a convenient way of varying the percentage drag reduction as an experimental parameter. Results were obtained for mean velocity and intensity profiles, autocorrelations, and one-dimensional energy spectra. The mean period of turbulent bursts was determined by measuring autocorrelations with short sampling times.At the lowest Reynolds number (Re = 1.4 × 104), drag reductions of about 70% were obtained during the first two passes. This was accompanied by a reduction in the streamwise intensity below the level obtained in the surfactant solution alone. (Note: The opposite behaviour is found in drag-reducing polymer solutions, where intensity levels are larger than those in the solvent alone.) A measurement of the r.m.s. circumferential velocity showed an increased level (relative to surfactant alone) during this part of the experiment. During further passes, there was a transition to ‘polymer-like’ behaviour, with increased streamwise intensity, which subsequently declined with pass number (and hence drag reduction) towards the result for surfactant alone. This effect had previously been found in preliminary experiments at Re = 9 × 103 (McComb & Chan 1979). Repetition of the experiment a Re = 1.4 × 104, with the addition of Separan AP30, confirmed the existence of this transition from ‘fibre-like’ to ‘polymer-like’ drag reduction. In this case, the drag reduction was smaller (at about 60%), but the mixed suspension was much more resistant to degradation, with transition occurring at the ninth pass. However, such behaviour was not found at higher Reynolds numbers (Re = 3.2 × 104 and 5.3 × 104), in fibre suspensions where increased streamwise intensities occurred, even at high levels of drag reduction (about 70%).Anomalous streamwise autocorrelations were found during ‘fibre-like’ drag reduction but in the ‘polymer-like’ regime they were very similar to those measured in polymer solution, and showed characteristically increased lengthscales. On the other hand, energy spectra were found to be anomalous in all cases and showed an energy deficit at lengthscales of the same order as the fibre length. Finally, mean bursting periods were found to be much increased, with the increases being about the same as those in polymer solutions at the same Reynolds number and percentage drag reduction.
[1]
C. J. Lawn,et al.
The determination of the rate of dissipation in turbulent pipe flow
,
1971,
Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[2]
J. Strickland,et al.
’’Bursting’’ frequencies obtained from wall shear stress fluctuations in a turbulent boundary layer
,
1975
.
[3]
N. Wickramasinghe.
Light scattering functions for small particles : with applications in astronomy
,
1973
.
[4]
S. E. Logan.
Laser velocimeter measurement of Reynolds stress and turbulence in dilute polymer solutions
,
1972
.
[5]
Gary K. Patterson,et al.
Drag reduction in solid‐fluid systems
,
1975
.
[6]
W. D. McComb,et al.
Drag reduction in fibre suspension
,
1981,
Nature.
[7]
Robert J. Hansen,et al.
The Drag Reduction Phenomenon. Observed Characteristics, Improved Agents, and Proposed Mechanisms
,
1975
.
[8]
John L. Lumley,et al.
Drag Reduction by Additives
,
1969
.
[9]
M. Rudd.
Velocity measurements made with a laser dopplermeter on the turbulent pipe flow of a dilute polymer solution
,
1972,
Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[10]
J. Hoyt.
A Freeman Scholar Lecture: The Effect of Additives on Fluid Friction
,
1972
.
[11]
Kenneth A. Smith,et al.
The Ultimate Asymptote and Mean Flow Structure in Toms’ Phenomenon
,
1970
.
[12]
V. Seshadri,et al.
Drag reduction in dilute fibre suspensions: Some mechanistic aspects
,
1979
.
[13]
P. S. Virk.
Drag reduction fundamentals
,
1975
.
[14]
W. D. MCCOMB,et al.
Drag reduction in fibre suspensions: transitional behaviour due to fibre degradation
,
1979,
Nature.
[15]
J. J. Allan,et al.
Effect of polymer additives on the small‐scale structure of grid‐generated turbulence
,
1977
.
[16]
W. Mccomb,et al.
Local drag reduction due to injection of polymer solutions into turbulent flow in a pipe. Part II: Laser‐doppler measurements of turbulent structure
,
1982
.
[17]
Stephen J. Kline,et al.
The production of turbulence near a smooth wall in a turbulent boundary layer
,
1971,
Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[18]
Arthur B. Metzner,et al.
TURBULENT DRAG REDUCTION IN POLYMERIC SOLUTIONS CONTAINING SUSPENDED FIBERS
,
1974
.
[19]
W. Gauvin,et al.
The effects of turbulence on the flow characteristics of model fibre suspensions
,
1967
.
[20]
H. Ellis.
Effects of Shear Treatment on Drag-reducing Polymer Solutions and Fibre Suspensions
,
1970,
Nature.
[21]
R. H. Sabersky,et al.
Heat transfer and friction coefficients for dilute suspensions of asbestos fibers
,
1978
.