Team Meeting Attitudes

Although most work teams use meetings as a tool for accomplishing their objectives, there is little research examining meeting-related variables in teams. In this article, we propose a new construct, team meeting attitudes (TMA), that involves individuals’ thoughts, feelings, and evaluations of team meetings. We constructed a scale that measures individuals’ TMA, and we report on the scale’s psychometric properties, including test-retest reliabilities, over four measurement occasions. Using a sample of engineering project design teams, intraclass correlations of repeated measurements suggested that TMA appeared to emerge over time. Moreover, our TMA scale, aggregated to the team level using the mean, had direct effects on time spent in team meetings, perceptions of team meeting effectiveness, and team potency. Mean TMA were also indirectly related to team task performance through team potency. These findings were interpreted as supportive of activity regulation and action theories because teams with high means on TMA may have members who view team meetings as conducive to goal accomplishment and not as interruptive.

[1]  Douglas N. Jackson,et al.  A Sequential System for Personality Scale Development1 , 1970 .

[2]  Mary E. Zellmer-Bruhn,et al.  Assessing Group-Level Constructs Under Missing Data Conditions: A Monte Carlo Simulation , 2010 .

[3]  B P O'Connor,et al.  SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test , 2000, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[4]  Steven G. Rogelberg,et al.  Perceived Meeting Effectiveness: The Role of Design Characteristics , 2009 .

[5]  N. Allen,et al.  Group beliefs, ability, and performance: The potency of group potency. , 2002 .

[6]  D. Chan Functional Relations among Constructs in the Same Content Domain at Different Levels of Analysis: A Typology of Composition Models , 1998 .

[7]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS , 1993 .

[8]  F. Zijlstra,et al.  Temporal factors in mental work: Effects of interrupted activities , 1999 .

[9]  S. Sonnentag,et al.  Individual-Level Predictors of Task-Related Teamwork Processes , 2009 .

[10]  L. Morey The Challenge of Construct Validity in the Assessment of Psychopathology , 2000 .

[11]  Dov Zohar,et al.  When things go wrong: The effect of daily work hassles on effort, exertion and negative mood , 1999 .

[12]  Matthew S. Fritz,et al.  Distribution of the product confidence limits for the indirect effect: Program PRODCLIN , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[13]  Marissa L. Shuffler,et al.  Employee satisfaction with meetings: A contemporary facet of job satisfaction , 2010 .

[14]  Daniel A. Newman,et al.  How Do Missing Data Bias Estimates of Within-Group Agreement? Sensitivity of SD WG, CVWG, rWG(J), rWG(J) * , and ICC to Systematic Nonresponse , 2009 .

[15]  David J. Stanley,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Nonresponse on Work Group Diversity Effects , 2007 .

[16]  M. Sobel Effect analysis and causation in linear structural equation models , 1990 .

[17]  J. Keyton,et al.  Perceiving Strategic Meeting Interaction , 2009 .

[18]  J. Loevinger,et al.  The attenuation paradox in test theory. , 1954, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  T. Kline The team player inventory: Reliability and validity of a measure of predisposition toward organizational team-working environments , 1999 .

[20]  Thomas A. O'Neill,et al.  Personality and the Prediction of Team Performance , 2011 .

[21]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. , 1998 .

[22]  S. Rogelberg,et al.  "Not another meeting!" Are meeting time demands related to employee well-being? , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[23]  W F Velicer,et al.  Factors Influencing Four Rules For Determining The Number Of Components To Retain. , 1982, Multivariate behavioral research.

[24]  Jennifer M. George,et al.  Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. , 1990 .

[25]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes , 2001 .

[26]  Steven G. Rogelberg,et al.  The Science and Fiction of Meetings , 2007 .

[27]  Paul R. Yost,et al.  Potency in groups: articulating a construct. , 1993, The British journal of social psychology.

[28]  Kara A. Incalcaterra,et al.  A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[29]  A. Luong,et al.  Meetings and More Meetings: The Relationship Between Meeting Load and the Daily Well-Being of Employees. , 2005 .

[30]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  Clarifying conditions and decision points for mediational type inferences in Organizational Behavior , 2006 .