Evaluating intensity normalization on MRIs of human brain with multiple sclerosis

Intensity normalization is an important pre-processing step in the study and analysis of Magnetic Resonance Images (MRI) of human brains. As most parametric supervised automatic image segmentation and classification methods base their assumptions regarding the intensity distributions on a standardized intensity range, intensity normalization takes on a very significant role. One of the fast and accurate approaches proposed for intensity normalization is that of Nyul and colleagues. In this work, we present, for the first time, an extensive validation of this approach in real clinical domain where even after intensity inhomogeneity correction that accounts for scanner-specific artifacts, the MRI volumes can be affected from variations such as data heterogeneity resulting from multi-site multi-scanner acquisitions, the presence of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions and the stage of disease progression in the brain. Using the distributional divergence criteria, we evaluate the effectiveness of the normalization in rendering, under the distributional assumptions of segmentation approaches, intensities that are more homogenous for the same tissue type while simultaneously resulting in better tissue type separation. We also demonstrate the advantage of the decile based piece-wise linear approach on the task of MS lesion segmentation against a linear normalization approach over three image segmentation algorithms: a standard Bayesian classifier, an outlier detection based approach and a Bayesian classifier with Markov Random Field (MRF) based post-processing. Finally, to demonstrate the independence of the effectiveness of normalization from the complexity of segmentation algorithm, we evaluate the Nyul method against the linear normalization on Bayesian algorithms of increasing complexity including a standard Bayesian classifier with Maximum Likelihood parameter estimation and a Bayesian classifier with integrated data priors, in addition to the above Bayesian classifier with MRF based post-processing to smooth the posteriors. In all relevant cases, the observed results are verified for statistical relevance using significance tests.

[1]  James D Christensen,et al.  Normalization of brain magnetic resonance images using histogram even-order derivative analysis. , 2003, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[2]  Simon K. Warfield,et al.  Normalization of joint image-intensity statistics in MRI using the Kullback-Leibler divergence , 2004, 2004 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro (IEEE Cat No. 04EX821).

[3]  D. Collins,et al.  Automatic 3D Intersubject Registration of MR Volumetric Data in Standardized Talairach Space , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[4]  Koen L. Vincken,et al.  Probabilistic segmentation of white matter lesions in MR imaging , 2004, NeuroImage.

[5]  Ponnada A. Narayana,et al.  Generalized fuzzy clustering for segmentation of multi-spectral magnetic resonance images , 2008, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[6]  H. Jeffreys An invariant form for the prior probability in estimation problems , 1946, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[7]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  New Variants of a Method of MRI Scale Normalization , 1999, IPMI.

[8]  J. K. Udupa,et al.  An approach to standardize the MR image intensity scale , 1999 .

[9]  Ingemar J. Cox,et al.  Dynamic histogram warping of image pairs for constant image brightness , 1995, Proceedings., International Conference on Image Processing.

[10]  Pierre Hellier,et al.  Consistent intensity correction of MR images , 2003, Proceedings 2003 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.03CH37429).

[11]  Reto Meuli,et al.  Robust parameter estimation of intensity distributions for brain magnetic resonance images , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  J. Udupa,et al.  Estimation of tumor volume with fuzzy-connectedness segmentation of MR images. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[13]  Florian Jäger,et al.  A Comparison of Five Methods for Signal Intensity Standardization in MRI , 2008, Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin.

[14]  D McAlpine,et al.  Multiple sclerosis: a review. , 1973, British medical journal.

[15]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  Adaptive Segmentation of MRI Data , 1995, CVRMed.

[16]  Ponnada A. Narayana,et al.  Segmentation and quantification of black holes in multiple sclerosis , 2006, NeuroImage.

[17]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  Determining correspondence in 3-D MR brain images using attribute vectors as morphological signatures of voxels , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  Interplay between intensity standardization and inhomogeneity correction in MR image processing , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  L G Nyúl,et al.  On standardizing the MR image intensity scale , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  Hugues Benoit-Cattin,et al.  Intensity non-uniformity correction in MRI: Existing methods and their validation , 2006, Medical Image Anal..

[21]  Fabrice Heitz,et al.  Automatic change detection in multimodal serial MRI: application to multiple sclerosis lesion evolution , 2003, NeuroImage.

[22]  Jelle Jolles,et al.  A time-saving and facilitating approach for segmentation of anatomically defined cortical regions: MRI volumetry , 2010, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[23]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Bayesian MS Lesion Classification Modeling Regional and Local Spatial Information , 2006, 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR'06).

[24]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  Segmenting Lung Fields in Serial Chest Radiographs Using Both Population-Based and Patient-Specific Shape Statistics , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  Grégoire Malandain,et al.  Hierarchical segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions in multi-sequence MRI , 2004, 2004 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro (IEEE Cat No. 04EX821).

[26]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  New variants of a method of MRI scale standardization , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[27]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Detection of Gad-Enhancing Lesions in Multiple Sclerosis Using Conditional Random Fields , 2010, MICCAI.

[28]  D J Heeger,et al.  Robust multiresolution alignment of MRI brain volumes , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[30]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  Three-dimensional multimodal brain warping using the Demons algorithm and adaptive intensity corrections , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[31]  Ali R. Khan,et al.  FreeSurfer-initiated fully-automated subcortical brain segmentation in MRI using Large Deformation Diffeomorphic Metric Mapping , 2008, NeuroImage.

[32]  F. Wacker,et al.  A New Method for MRI Intensity Standardization with Application to Lesion Detection in the Brain , 2006 .

[33]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Bayesian Classification of Multiple Sclerosis Lesions in Longitudinal MRI Using Subtraction Images , 2010, MICCAI.

[34]  Koenraad Van Leemput,et al.  Automated segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions by model outlier detection , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[35]  L. R. Dice Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species , 1945 .

[36]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial registration and normalization of images , 1995 .