Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity.

This experimental protocol was designed to investigate whether visual attention is obligatorily deployed at the endpoint of saccades. To this end, we recorded the eye position of human participants engaged in a saccade task via eye tracking and assessed visual orientation discrimination performance at various locations during saccade preparation. Importantly, instead of using a single saccade target paradigm for which the saccade endpoint typically coincides roughly with the target, this protocol comprised the presentation of two nearby saccade targets, leading to a distinct spatial dissociation between target locations and saccade endpoint on a substantial number of trials. The paradigm allowed us to compare presaccadic visual discrimination performance at the endpoint of accurate saccades (landing at one of the saccade targets) and of averaging saccades (landing at an intermediate location in between the two targets). We observed a selective enhancement of visual sensitivity at the endpoint of accurate saccades but not at the endpoint of averaging saccades. Rather, before the execution of averaging saccades, visual sensitivity was equally enhanced at both targets, suggesting that saccade averaging follows from unresolved attentional selection among the saccade targets. These results argue against a mandatory coupling between visual attention and saccade programming based on a direct measure of presaccadic visual sensitivity rather than saccadic reaction times, which have been used in other protocols to draw similar conclusions. While our protocol provides a useful framework to investigate the relationship between visual attention and saccadic eye movements at the behavioral level, it can also be combined with electrophysiological measures to extend insights at the neuronal level.

[1]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Sensitivity measures of visuospatial attention , 2017 .

[2]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Microsaccades are triggered by low retinal image slip. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  B. Dosher,et al.  The role of attention in the programming of saccades , 1995, Vision Research.

[4]  J. Findlay Global visual processing for saccadic eye movements , 1982, Vision Research.

[5]  S Van der Stigchel,et al.  There is no attentional global effect: Attentional shifts are independent of the saccade endpoint. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[6]  B. Hommel,et al.  Estrogen modulates inhibitory control in healthy human females: evidence from the stop-signal paradigm , 2010, Neuroscience.

[7]  Peter W Dicke,et al.  Neuron-specific contribution of the superior colliculus to overt and covert shifts of attention , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  H. Deubel,et al.  Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism , 1996, Vision Research.

[9]  James R Müller,et al.  Microstimulation of the superior colliculus focuses attention without moving the eyes. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Robert M. McPeek,et al.  Deficits in saccade target selection after inactivation of superior colliculus , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Space and selective attention , 1994 .

[12]  Françoise Vitu,et al.  About the global effect and the critical role of retinal eccentricity: Implications for eye movements in reading , 2008 .

[13]  Woodrow Barfield,et al.  Human Perception and Performance in 3D Virtual Environments , 1994 .

[14]  M Corbetta,et al.  Frontoparietal cortical networks for directing attention and the eye to visual locations: identical, independent, or overlapping neural systems? , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Stefan Van der Stigchel,et al.  The global effect: what determines where the eyes land? , 2011 .

[16]  Stephen J. Gotts,et al.  Cell-Type-Specific Synchronization of Neural Activity in FEF with V 4 during Attention , 2022 .

[17]  Stephen J. Gotts,et al.  Cell-Type-Specific Synchronization of Neural Activity in FEF with V4 during Attention , 2012, Neuron.

[18]  A. Kingstone,et al.  Topic: Cognition , 2003 .

[19]  Chris Rorden,et al.  Saccade preparation is required for exogenous attention but not endogenous attention or IOR. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  Junying Yuan,et al.  Selective gating of visual signals by microstimulation of frontal cortex , 2022 .

[21]  Dirk Kerzel,et al.  Presaccadic perceptual facilitation effects depend on saccade execution: evidence from the stop-signal paradigm. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[22]  Fred H Hamker,et al.  Split of spatial attention as predicted by a systems‐level model of visual attention , 2011, The European journal of neuroscience.

[23]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Visual attention is not deployed at the endpoint of averaging saccades , 2018, PLoS biology.

[24]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Updating the premotor theory: the allocation of attention is not always accompanied by saccade preparation. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  S. Coren,et al.  Effect of Non-Target Stimuli upon Length of Voluntary Saccades , 1972, Perceptual and motor skills.

[27]  Takashi R Sato,et al.  Neuronal Basis of Covert Spatial Attention in the Frontal Eye Field , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  T. Moore,et al.  Microstimulation of the frontal eye field and its effects on covert spatial attention. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.