Optimal modulation of indirect Z-source matrix converter

Z-source energy conversion is a recent concept introduced for adding voltage-boost functionality to the otherwise buck-only dc-ac inverter. The same concept can equally be extended to other converter topologies including the indirect ac-ac matrix converter, where only a single Z-source impedance network needs to be inserted to its intermediate dc-link. Because of such a simple insertion, topological extension of the indirect Z-source matrix converter is viewed as trivial with its operating states easily deducible from its existing dc-ac counterpart. In contrast, modulation of the extended indirect ac-ac entity is judged as nontrivial and not at all obvious if advantages like buck-boost flexibility, minimum commutation count and ease of implementation are to be attained simultaneously, in addition to sinusoidal input and output quantities commonly set as objectives for ac-ac energy conversion. Attaining these advantages simultaneously is no doubt important since any shortfalls or compromises would make it even harder to justify for those passive components introduced to the otherwise “all semiconductor” indirect matrix converter. Bringing forth these advantages by unveiling related optimal modulation theories is therefore a relevant investigation that is pursued now to better present the indirect Z-source matrix converter as an attractive alternative for ac-ac buck-boost energy conversion. Findings presented here on have already been verified in simulation or experimentally using a laboratory-constructed prototype.

[1]  Bashar Zahawi,et al.  New modulation method for matrix converters using space vectors , 2000 .

[2]  T. Lipo,et al.  AC/AC power conversion based on matrix converter topology with unidirectional switches , 2000 .

[3]  Fang Zheng Peng Z-source inverter , 2002 .

[4]  Thomas A. Lipo,et al.  Investigation of 9-switch dual-bridge matrix converter operating under low output power factor , 2003, 38th IAS Annual Meeting on Conference Record of the Industry Applications Conference, 2003..

[5]  A. Joseph,et al.  Z-source inverter for motor drives , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[6]  D. Borojevic,et al.  Space vector modulated three-phase to three-phase matrix converter with input power factor correction , 1995 .

[7]  Shaojun Xie,et al.  Z-Source AC-AC Converters Solving Commutation Problem , 2007, 2007 IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference.

[8]  Heikki Tuusa,et al.  Realization of a three-phase indirect matrix converter with an indirect vector modulation method , 2003, IEEE 34th Annual Conference on Power Electronics Specialist, 2003. PESC '03..

[9]  Frede Blaabjerg,et al.  Digital carrier modulation and sampling issues of matrix converters , 2008 .

[10]  Thomas A. Lipo,et al.  Matrix converter topologies with reduced number of switches , 2002, 2002 IEEE 33rd Annual IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37289).

[11]  Seung-Ki Sul,et al.  Carrier-Based Modulation Technique for Matrix Converter , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[12]  F.Z. Peng,et al.  Maximum boost control of the Z-source inverter , 2004, 2004 IEEE 35th Annual Power Electronics Specialists Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37551).

[13]  Shao Zhang,et al.  Novel three-phase AC-AC Z-Source converters using matrix converter theory , 2009, 2009 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition.

[14]  Poh Chiang Loh,et al.  Pulse-width modulation of Z-source inverters , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.