论文信息 - Testing for Regret and Disappointment in Choice under Uncertainty

Testing for Regret and Disappointment in Choice under Uncertainty

Much of the experimental evidence concerning violations of von Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility theory has been collected fr om experiments designed with conventional theory in mind and does not provide direct tests of alternative models such as regret theory and disappointment theory. This paper reports and discusses recent evidence produced by an exp erimentspe cifically designed to test for the impacts of regret and disappointment, and to indicate their relative importance. Copyright 1987 by Royal Economic Society.

R. Sugden | G. Loomes

[1] M. Allais. Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque : critique des postulats et axiomes de l'ecole americaine , 1953 .

[2] A. Tversky,et al. Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[3] Ole Hagen,et al. Towards a Positive Theory of Preferences under Risk , 1979 .

[4] K. MacCrimmon,et al. Utility Theory: Axioms Versus ‘Paradoxes’ , 1979 .

[5] P. Schoemaker. The Expected Utility Model: Its Variants, Purposes, Evidence and Limitations , 1982 .

[6] P. Fishburn. Nontransitive measurable utility , 1982 .

[7] M. Machina. "Expected Utility" Analysis without the Independence Axiom , 1982 .

[8] David E. Bell,et al. Regret in Decision Making under Uncertainty , 1982, Oper. Res..

[9] R. Sugden,et al. Regret Theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty Review of Economic Studies , 1982 .

[10] P. Fishburn. Transitive measurable utility , 1983 .

[11] Robert Sugden,et al. The Importance of What Might Have Been , 1984 .

[12] David E. Bell,et al. Disappointment in Decision Making Under Uncertainty , 1985, Oper. Res..

[13] Robert Sugden,et al. Disappointment and Dynamic Consistency in Choice under Uncertainty , 1986 .

[14] R. Sugden,et al. Some implications of a more general form of regret theory , 1987 .