Understanding Mills via Mill-type methods: An application of qualitative comparative analysis to a study of labor management in southern textile manufacturing

A number of recent writers have advocated a computer-based approach to the analysis of qualitative data that leans on John Stuart Mill's method of agreement and the indirect method of difference. Those discussions, however, remain fairly abstract and provide little insight into how analyses based on Mill-type methods unfold and their relative costs and benefits. In this paper we describe the logic and use of one prominent Mill-type software program called QCA (Qualitative Comparative Analysis) in the context of an analysis of evidence drawn from twenty-two interviews with managers in textile plants. Our substantive aim is to understand labor-management practices in Southern textile manufacturing plants; our methodological aim is to illustrate the strengths and weaknesses of the Mill-type logic in action.

[1]  Ruth Milkman,et al.  The New American Workplace: Transforming Work Systems in the United States. , 1993 .

[2]  Philip B. Crosby,et al.  Quality Is Free: The Art of Making Quality Certain , 1979 .

[3]  Alexander Hicks,et al.  Qualitative Comparative Analysis and Analytical Induction , 1994 .

[4]  Robert Blauner,et al.  Alienation and Freedom; The Factory Worker and His Industry. , 1964 .

[5]  T. Skocpol,et al.  States and social revolutions : a comparative analysis of France, Russia, and China , 1979 .

[6]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[7]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[8]  The new plant revolution revisited , 1990 .

[9]  C. Sabel,et al.  The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity , 1984 .

[10]  M. Kelley.  New Process Technology, Job Design, and Work Organization: A Contingency Model , 1990 .

[11]  J. V. Maanen.  Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography , 1989 .

[12]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[13]  Edwin Amenta,et al.  Where to Begin , 1994 .

[14]  Stanley Lieberson,et al.  More on the Uneasy Case for Using Mill-Type Methods in Small-N Comparative Studies , 1994 .

[15]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State: Introduction to qualitative comparative analysis , 1994 .

[16]  J. Savolainen.  The Rationality of Drawing Big Conclusions Based on Small Samples: In Defense of Mill's Methods , 1994 .

[17]  T. Skocpol,et al.  States and Social Revolutions , 1979 .

[18]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[19]  Stanley Lieberson,et al.  Small N's and Big Conclusions: An Examination of the Reasoning in Comparative Studies Based on a Small Number of Cases , 1991 .

[20]  Alexander Hicks,et al.  The comparative political economy of the welfare state , 1995 .

[21]  W. Form,et al.  The Impact of Technology on Work Organization and Work Outcomes A Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda , 1988 .

[22]  Günter L. Huber,et al.  Computer assistance for testing hypotheses about qualitative data: The software package AQUAD 3.0 , 1991 .