Cardiac MRI of ischemic heart disease at 3 T: potential and challenges.

Cardiac MRI has become a routinely used imaging modality in the diagnosis of cardiovascular disease and is considered the clinically accepted gold standard modality for the assessment of cardiac function and myocardial viability. In recent years, commercially available clinical scanners with a higher magnetic field strength (3.0 T) and dedicated multi-element coils have become available. The superior signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of these systems has lead to their rapid acceptance in cranial and musculoskeletal MRI while the adoption of 3.0 T for cardiovascular imaging has been somewhat slower. This review article describes the benefits and pitfalls of magnetic resonance imaging of ischemic heart disease at higher field strengths. The fundamental changes in parameters such as SNR, transversal and longitudinal relaxation times, susceptibility artifacts, RF (B1) inhomogeneity, and specific absorption rate are discussed. We also review approaches to avoid compromised image quality such as banding artifacts and inconsistent or suboptimal flip angles. Imaging sequences for the assessment of cardiac function with CINE balanced SSFP imaging and MR tagging, myocardial perfusion, and delayed enhancement and their adjustments for higher field imaging are explained in detail along with several clinical examples. We also explore the use of parallel imaging at 3.0 T to improve cardiac imaging by trading the SNR gain for higher field strengths for acquisition speed with increased coverage or improved spatial and temporal resolution. This approach is particularly useful for dynamic applications that are usually limited to the duration of a single breath-hold.

[1]  H. Rinneberg,et al.  Human cardiac imaging at 3 T using phased array coils , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  S. Plein,et al.  Steady‐state free precession magnetic resonance imaging of the heart: Comparison with segmented k‐space gradient‐echo imaging , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  Kensuke Sekihara,et al.  Steady-State Magnetizations in Rapid NMR Imaging Using Small Flip Angles and Short Repetition Intervals , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  T J Brady,et al.  Cardiac susceptibility artifacts arising from the heart‐lung interface , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Cardiac CINE MR imaging with a 32‐channel cardiac coil and parallel imaging: Impact of acceleration factors on image quality and volumetric accuracy , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  Thoralf Niendorf,et al.  Highly accelerated cardiovascular MR imaging using many channel technology: concepts and clinical applications , 2007, European Radiology.

[7]  R. Edelman,et al.  Cineangiography of the heart in a single breath hold with a segmented turboFLASH sequence. , 1991, Radiology.

[8]  Matthias Stuber,et al.  Coronary MR angiography at 3T during diastole and systole , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  Cardiac SSFP imaging at 3 Tesla , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  A. Haase,et al.  Rapid NMR Imaging Using Low Flip-Angle Pulses , 2004 .

[11]  E. Zerhouni,et al.  Human heart: tagging with MR imaging--a method for noninvasive assessment of myocardial motion. , 1988, Radiology.

[12]  M. Bronskill,et al.  T1, T2 relaxation and magnetization transfer in tissue at 3T , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  B. Hargreaves,et al.  Variable‐rate selective excitation for rapid MRI sequences , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  O. Simonetti,et al.  An improved MR imaging technique for the visualization of myocardial infarction. , 2001, Radiology.

[15]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  Sensitivity‐encoded coronary MRA at 3T , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  J Paul Finn,et al.  Cardiac Cine Imaging at 3 Tesla: Initial Experience With a 32-Element Body-Array Coil , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[17]  E. McVeigh,et al.  Phase‐sensitive inversion recovery for detecting myocardial infarction using gadolinium‐delayed hyperenhancement † , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  E. McVeigh MRI of myocardial function: motion tracking techniques. , 1996, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[19]  N. Merchant,et al.  MR perfusion and delayed enhancement imaging in the heart. , 2006, Clinical radiology.

[20]  M. Fenchel,et al.  Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3.0 T , 2007, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[21]  J. Glockner,et al.  3 Tesla MR imaging provides improved contrast in first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging over a range of gadolinium doses. , 2005, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[22]  J. Bogaert,et al.  Left ventricular myocardial tagging. , 2004 .

[23]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Practical approaches to the evaluation of signal‐to‐noise ratio performance with parallel imaging: Application with cardiac imaging and a 32‐channel cardiac coil , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  M. Gutberlet,et al.  Influence of high magnetic field strengths and parallel acquisition strategies on image quality in cardiac 2D CINE magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of 1.5 T vs. 3.0 T , 2005, European Radiology.

[25]  Kieran Clarke,et al.  Cardiac cine MR-imaging at 3T: FLASH vs SSFP. , 2006, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[26]  O. Simonetti,et al.  Three‐dimensional breathhold SSFP coronary MRA: A comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[27]  Dwight G Nishimura,et al.  Fat‐suppressed steady‐state free precession imaging using phase detection , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  Katherine C. Wu,et al.  Delayed enhancement MR imaging: utility in myocardial assessment. , 2006, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[29]  H. Carr STEADY-STATE FREE PRECESSION IN NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE , 1958 .

[30]  K. Scheffler,et al.  Is TrueFISP a gradient‐echo or a spin‐echo sequence? , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[31]  Hajime Sakuma,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging for ischemic heart disease , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[32]  R M Henkelman,et al.  Water dynamics in human blood via combined measurements of T2 relaxation and diffusion in the presence of gadolinium , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[33]  J Paul Finn,et al.  Analysis of Cardiac Function—Comparison Between 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 Tesla Cardiac Cine Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Preliminary Experience , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[34]  O. Simonetti,et al.  Cine MR angiography of the heart with segmented true fast imaging with steady-state precession. , 2001, Radiology.

[35]  D. Sodickson,et al.  Ultimate intrinsic signal‐to‐noise ratio for parallel MRI: Electromagnetic field considerations , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[36]  E. Fleck,et al.  How we perform myocardial perfusion with cardiovascular magnetic resonance. , 2007, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[37]  Michael Markl,et al.  On flow effects in balanced steady‐state free precession imaging: Pictorial description, parameter dependence, and clinical implications , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[38]  J. Mintorovitch,et al.  Comparison of Magnetic Properties of MRI Contrast Media Solutions at Different Magnetic Field Strengths , 2005, Investigative radiology.

[39]  Christopher P Cannon,et al.  Intensive versus moderate lipid lowering with statins after acute coronary syndromes. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[40]  M. Robson,et al.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging at 3-tesla for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparison with 1.5-tesla. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[41]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Phase-sensitive inversion-recovery MR imaging in the detection of myocardial infarction. , 2005, Radiology.

[42]  O. Simonetti,et al.  The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[43]  C. Claussen,et al.  Assessment of Myocardial Viability Using Delayed Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3.0 Tesla , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[44]  P. Kellman,et al.  Imaging sequences for first pass perfusion --a review. , 2007, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[45]  Hsi-Yu Yu,et al.  First-pass myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 3 Tesla. , 2007, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[46]  W. T. Dixon Simple proton spectroscopic imaging. , 1984, Radiology.

[47]  Thoralf Niendorf,et al.  Comprehensive Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3.0 Tesla: Feasibility and Implications for Clinical Applications , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[48]  Reed F Busse,et al.  Reduced RF power without blurring: Correcting for modulation of refocusing flip angle in FSE sequences , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[49]  K. Uğurbil,et al.  Parallel imaging performance as a function of field strength—An experimental investigation using electrodynamic scaling , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[50]  D. Pennell,et al.  Breath-hold FLASH and FISP cardiovascular MR imaging: left ventricular volume differences and reproducibility. , 2002, Radiology.

[51]  Lawrence L Wald,et al.  Comparison of Cardiac MRI on 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla Clinical Whole Body Systems , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[52]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[53]  Roderic I Pettigrew,et al.  Effect of Gd‐DTPA‐BMA on blood and myocardial T1 at 1.5T and 3T in humans , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[54]  Reza Nezafat,et al.  B1‐insensitive T2 preparation for improved coronary magnetic resonance angiography at 3 T , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[55]  R. Ehman,et al.  Acute myocardial ischemia: magnetic resonance contrast enhancement with gadolinium-DTPA. , 1984, Radiology.

[56]  F. Schick,et al.  Relaxivity of Gadopentetate Dimeglumine (Magnevist), Gadobutrol (Gadovist), and Gadobenate Dimeglumine (MultiHance) in Human Blood Plasma at 0.2, 1.5, and 3 Tesla , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[57]  C. Hardy,et al.  32‐element receiver‐coil array for cardiac imaging , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[58]  Debiao Li,et al.  Artifact reduction in true‐FISP imaging of the coronary arteries by adjusting imaging frequency , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[59]  C. Claussen,et al.  Kardiales MR-Tagging: Parameteroptimierung und Sequenzvergleich bei 1,5 T und 3,0 T an einem Probandenkollektiv , 2006 .

[60]  Kieran Clarke,et al.  Determination of cardiac volumes and mass with FLASH and SSFP cine sequences at 1.5 vs. 3 Tesla: A validation study , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[61]  R. Edelman,et al.  First-pass cardiac perfusion: evaluation with ultrafast MR imaging. , 1990, Radiology.

[62]  K. Scheffler,et al.  Multiecho sequences with variable refocusing flip angles: Optimization of signal behavior using smooth transitions between pseudo steady states (TRAPS) , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[63]  P. Bendel,et al.  An analysis of fast imaging sequences with steady‐state transverse magnetization refocusing , 1988, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[64]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Cardiac Steady-State Free Precession CINE Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3.0 Tesla: Impact of Parallel Imaging Acceleration on Volumetric Accuracy and Signal Parameters , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[65]  T. Foster,et al.  A review of normal tissue hydrogen NMR relaxation times and relaxation mechanisms from 1-100 MHz: dependence on tissue type, NMR frequency, temperature, species, excision, and age. , 1984, Medical physics.

[66]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Phase-Sensitive Inversion Recovery (PSIR) Single-Shot TrueFISP for Assessment of Myocardial Infarction at 3 Tesla , 2006, Investigative radiology.