Coarse-Scale Distribution Surveys and Occurrence Probability Modeling for Wolverine in Interior Alaska

Abstract We determined wolverine (Gulo gulo) distribution and occurrence probabilities using aerial surveys and hierarchical spatial modeling in a 180,000-km2 portion of Interior Alaska, USA. During 8 February–12 March 2006, we surveyed 149 of 180 1,000-km2 sample units for wolverine tracks. We observed wolverine tracks in 99 (66.4%) sample units. Wolverine detection probability was ≥69% throughout the survey period. Posterior occurrence probabilities of whether a wolverine track occurred in a sample unit was dependent on survey timing, number of transects flown, number of neighboring sample units with detected tracks, percentage of the sample unit with elevation ≤305 m, and human influences. Our model indicated strong evidence of occurrence (>0.80) in 72% of the 180 survey units, strong evidence of absence (<0.20) in 12%, and weak evidence of occurrence or absence (0.20–0.80) in 16%. Wolverine area of occupancy made up 83% of the study area. Simulations illustrated that 2–4 survey routes were necessary for the survey technique to provide strong evidence of wolverine presence or absence in Interior Alaska if a track was not identified along the first route. The necessary number of survey routes depends on the occurrence probability in a sample unit. We provided managers with a map of wolverine distribution in Interior Alaska and an efficient and lower-cost method to detect coarse-scale changes in wolverine distribution. Our technique was effective in both Interior Alaska and Ontario, Canada, suggesting it would be effective throughout most of the boreal forest range of wolverines where tracks can be readily observed from the air. The technique requires a certain skill level in recognizing tracks; it is essential that tracks are identified correctly and training may be necessary depending on surveyor experience.

[1]  J. Krebs,et al.  SYNTHESIS OF SURVIVAL RATES AND CAUSES OF MORTALITY IN NORTH AMERICAN WOLVERINES , 2004 .

[2]  K. Aubry,et al.  Using Anecdotal Occurrence Data for Rare or Elusive Species: The Illusion of Reality and a Call for Evidentiary Standards , 2008 .

[3]  L. Jack Lyon,et al.  The Scientific basis for conserving forest carnivores : American marten, fisher, lynx, and wolverine in the western United States / , 1994 .

[4]  Aaron M. Christ,et al.  Spatiotemporal analysis of wolverine Gulo gulo harvest in Alaska , 2007 .

[5]  J. Krebs,et al.  Multiscale Habitat Use by Wolverines in British Columbia, Canada , 2007 .

[6]  E. Lofroth,et al.  The Abundance and Distribution of Wolverines in British Columbia, Canada , 2007 .

[7]  MICHAEL K. SCHWARTZ,et al.  Sources and Patterns of Wolverine Mortality in Western Montana , 2007 .

[8]  Catherine A Calder,et al.  Accounting for uncertainty in ecological analysis: the strengths and limitations of hierarchical statistical modeling. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[9]  Darryl I. MacKenzie,et al.  Designing occupancy studies: general advice and allocating survey effort , 2005 .

[10]  SCOTT A. FIELD,et al.  OPTIMIZING ALLOCATION OF MONITORING EFFORT UNDER ECONOMIC AND OBSERVATIONAL CONSTRAINTS , 2005 .

[11]  KEVIN S. MCKELVEY,et al.  Seasonal Habitat Associations of the Wolverine in Central Idaho , 2007 .

[12]  Warren B. Ballard,et al.  Home range and habitat use by wolverines in southcentral Alaska , 1986 .

[13]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data, Revised Edition. , 1994 .

[14]  R. May,et al.  Habitat differentiation within the large-carnivore community of Norway's multiple-use landscapes , 2008, The Journal of applied ecology.

[15]  GLEN A. SARGEANT,et al.  MARKOV CHAIN MONTE CARLO ESTIMATION OF SPECIES DISTRIBUTIONS: A CASE STUDY OF THE SWIFT FOX IN WESTERN KANSAS , 2005 .

[16]  J. Jenness Calculating landscape surface area from digital elevation models , 2004 .

[17]  D. MacKenzie WHAT ARE THE ISSUES WITH PRESENCE–ABSENCE DATA FOR WILDLIFE MANAGERS? , 2005 .

[18]  K. Kunkel,et al.  Estimating Sustainable Harvest in Wolverine Populations Using Logistic Regression , 2008 .

[19]  J. Nichols,et al.  OF BUGS AND BIRDS: MARKOV CHAIN MONTE CARLO FOR HIERARCHICAL MODELING IN WILDLIFE RESEARCH , 2002 .

[20]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data. , 1992 .

[21]  Michael J. Wisdom,et al.  EVALUATION OF LANDSCAPE MODELS FOR WOLVERINES IN THE INTERIOR NORTHWEST, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , 2003 .

[22]  Mark Bertram,et al.  Moose mortality in eastern interior Alaska , 2002 .

[23]  R. Noss,et al.  CARNIVORES AS FOCAL SPECIES FOR CONSERVATION PLANNING IN THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN REGION , 2001 .

[24]  R. May,et al.  Impact of infrastructure on habitat selection of wolverines Gulo gulo , 2006 .

[25]  J. Ray,et al.  Modeling Wolverine Occurrence Using Aerial Surveys of Tracks in Snow , 2007 .

[26]  Aaron J. Poe,et al.  Estimating wolverine Gulo gulo population size using quadrat sampling of tracks in snow , 2007 .

[27]  C. Gardner The ecology of wolverines in southcentral Alaska , 1985 .

[28]  R. D. Boertje,et al.  The role of predation in limiting moose at low densities in Alaska and Yukon and implications for conservation , 1992 .