Defining interferon β response status in multiple sclerosis patients

IFN‐β is effective in reducing relapses and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions in multiple sclerosis (MS). It is assumed that individual therapeutic responses vary, but methods to identify IFN‐β responsiveness have not been validated. Our objective was to evaluate methods to classify IFN‐β responder status using relapses and MRI lesions. Data was analyzed from 172 patients who were followed up in a placebo‐controlled clinical trial of IFN‐β1a for 2 years. Patients were classified as responders or nonresponders using (1) the number of relapses during the 2‐year trial; (2) the number of new T2 lesions after 2 years; and (3) the number of gadolinium‐enhancing lesions at year 1 and year 2 on study. Outcomes included 2‐year change in the Expanded Disability Status Scale, Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite, and brain parenchymal fraction. We found that subgroups with high on‐study relapse numbers had more disease progression, differences between responder subgroups were similar in the IFN‐β1a and placebo arms. In contrast, subgroups with high numbers of new MRI lesions had significantly more disease progression only in the IFN‐β1a arm. Baseline characteristics failed to account for differential outcome. New MRI lesion activity during IFN‐β1a treatment correlates with poor response to IFN‐β1a. MRI classification may facilitate rational therapeutic decisions, better clinical trial designs, and studies correlating biomarkers with therapeutic response. Ann Neurol 2004

[1]  S. Vukusic,et al.  Clinical characteristics of responders to interferon therapy for relapsing MS , 2003, Neurology.

[2]  J. Lünemann,et al.  TNF-related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL) as a potential response marker for interferon-beta treatment in multiple sclerosis , 2003, The Lancet.

[3]  W. Heiss,et al.  Low interferon gamma producers are better treatment responders: a two-year follow-up of interferon beta-treated multiple sclerosis patients , 2002, Multiple sclerosis.

[4]  C. Polman,et al.  Baseline T cell reactivity in multiple sclerosis is correlated to efficacy of interferon-β , 2002, Journal of Neuroimmunology.

[5]  Marco Rovaris,et al.  Effect of early interferon treatment on conversion to definite multiple sclerosis: a randomised study , 2001, The Lancet.

[6]  J H Simon,et al.  Intramuscular interferon beta-1a therapy initiated during a first demyelinating event in multiple sclerosis. CHAMPS Study Group. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  R. Rudick,et al.  Use of the brain parenchymal fraction to measure whole brain atrophy in relapsing-remitting MS , 1999, Neurology.

[8]  G. Ebers,et al.  Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study of interferon β-1a in relapsing/remitting multiple sclerosis , 1998, The Lancet.

[9]  Christian Confavreux,et al.  Recommendations from the national multiple sclerosis society clinical outcomes assessment task force , 1997, Annals of neurology.

[10]  C. Granger,et al.  Intramuscular interferon beta‐1a for disease progression in relapsing multiple sclerosis , 1996, Annals of neurology.

[11]  M. Horsfield,et al.  Quantitative assessment of MRI lesion load in monitoring the evolution of multiple sclerosis. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  J. Frank,et al.  The effect of interferon‐β on blood—brain barrier disruptions demonstrated by constrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in relapsing—remitting multiple sclerosis , 1995, Annals of neurology.

[13]  J. Kurtzke Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis , 1983, Neurology.

[14]  Hompson,et al.  A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF ABNORMALITIES ON MRI AND DISABILITY FROM MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS , 2002 .

[15]  G Cutter,et al.  Relationship between brain atrophy and disability: an 8-year follow-up study of multiple sclerosis patients. , 2000, Multiple sclerosis.

[16]  Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study of interferon beta-1a in relapsing/remitting multiple sclerosis. PRISMS (Prevention of Relapses and Disability by Interferon beta-1a Subcutaneously in Multiple Sclerosis) Study Group. , 1998, Lancet.