A new carbon capture proxy model for optimizing the design and time-varying operation of a coal-natural gas power station

Abstract We optimize the design and time-varying operation of a CO 2 -capture-enabled power station burning coal and natural gas, subject to a CO 2 emission intensity constraint. The facility consists of a coal-fired power plant and an amine CO 2 capture system, which is powered by a combined-heat-and-power auxiliary gas-fired subsystem. The detailed design of the CO 2 capture system, the detailed heat integration of the facility, and time-varying operations schedule across all hours of the year are determined in a single optimization problem. This problem is formulated as a bi-objective mixed integer nonlinear program: objectives include minimizing total capital requirement (TCR) and maximizing net present value (NPV). Because the Aspen Plus model used for the CO 2 capture system is too computationally intensive to use directly in optimization runs, we develop a statistical proxy model of the capture system that reproduces Aspen Plus results but is several hundred times faster. The integrated proxy model includes statistical submodels for the CO 2 absorption and solvent regeneration blocks, as well as simple physical models of other system components. Incorporating the detailed CO 2 capture system in the optimization provides important design information such as the optimal number of CO 2 capture trains required. Two scenarios are considered, based on historical data for Texas and India. Results show that the choice of objective function can have a strong effect on planned operating profile (constant or variable operations). Similarly, hourly electricity price variability strongly affects design and plant scheduling. In the West Texas scenario, which has high price variability, the maximum NPV objective favors variable operations, with a CO 2 capture system utilization factor of 65.9% (out of a maximum of 85%), while the minimum TCR objective favors constant operations. In contrast, because of low electricity price variability in the India scenario, there is little value in time-shifting the demand for capture heat, so constant operations are favored in this case for both objectives.

[1]  Jean-Pierre Corriou,et al.  A Rigorous Optimization Method of Operating Parameters for Amine-Based CO2 Capture Processes , 2013 .

[2]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Surrogate-based Analysis and Optimization , 2005 .

[3]  M. Webber,et al.  Optimizing post-combustion CO2 capture in response to volatile electricity prices , 2012 .

[4]  Olav Bolland,et al.  Comparison of solvents for post-combustion capture of CO2 by chemical absorption , 2009 .

[5]  Anusha Kothandaraman,et al.  Carbon dioxide capture by chemical absorption : a solvent comparison study , 2010 .

[6]  Matthew Leach,et al.  Flexible Operation of Coal Fired Power Plants with Postcombustion Capture of Carbon Dioxide , 2009 .

[7]  Matthew Leach,et al.  Built-in flexibility at retrofitted power plants: What is it worth and can we afford to ignore it? , 2011 .

[8]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2001 .

[9]  Rajab Khalilpour,et al.  Multi-level investment planning and scheduling under electricity and carbon market dynamics: Retrofit of a power plant with PCC (post-combustion carbon capture) processes , 2014 .

[10]  Gary T. Rochelle,et al.  Dynamic Modeling to Minimize Energy Use for CO2 Capture in Power Plants by Aqueous Monoethanolamine , 2009 .

[11]  Constantinos C. Pantelides,et al.  An Integrated Framework for the Dynamic Modelling of Solvent-based CO2 Capture Processes☆ , 2014 .

[12]  Wilfried Maas,et al.  Flexibility of Low-CO2 Gas Power Plants: Integration of the CO2 Capture Unit with CCGT Operation , 2014 .

[13]  Richard C. Baliban,et al.  Modeling, Simulation, and Optimization of Postcombustion CO2 Capture for Variable Feed Concentration and Flow Rate. 1. Chemical Absorption and Membrane Processes , 2012 .

[14]  Priya Ravi Ganesh,et al.  Building Statistical Proxy Models for CO2 Geologic Sequestration , 2014 .

[15]  L. Durlofsky,et al.  A derivative-free methodology with local and global search for the constrained joint optimization of well locations and controls , 2014, Computational Geosciences.

[16]  Alexander W. Dowling,et al.  A framework for efficient large scale equation-oriented flowsheet optimization , 2015, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[17]  Chongqing Kang,et al.  Modeling Flexible Operation Mechanism of $\hbox{CO}_{2}$ Capture Power Plant and Its Effects on Power-System Operation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[18]  Iain MacGill,et al.  Simulations of scenarios with 100% renewable electricity in the Australian National Electricity Market , 2012 .

[19]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  IECM Technical Documentation Updates Final Report , 2009 .

[20]  Piet Demeester,et al.  ooDACE toolbox: a flexible object-oriented Kriging implementation , 2014, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[21]  Mark Z. Jacobson,et al.  A Monte Carlo approach to generator portfolio planning and carbon emissions assessments of systems with large penetrations of variable renewables. , 2011 .

[22]  Michael E. Webber,et al.  Turning CO2 Capture On and Off in Response to Electric Grid Demand: A Baseline Analysis of Emissions and Economics , 2010 .

[23]  N. Shah,et al.  The multi-period optimisation of an amine-based CO2 capture process integrated with a super-critical coal-fired power station for flexible operation , 2015, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[24]  Louis J. Durlofsky,et al.  Optimal operation of an integrated energy system including fossil fuel power generation, CO2 capture and wind , 2011 .

[25]  Luis M. Romeo,et al.  Optimization of intercooling compression in CO2 capture systems , 2009 .

[26]  Kathryn H. Smith,et al.  A kinetic and process modeling study of CO2 capture with MEA-promoted potassium carbonate solutions , 2012 .

[27]  Mai Bui,et al.  Dynamic modelling and optimisation of flexible operation in post-combustion CO2 capture plants - A review , 2014, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[28]  Louis J. Durlofsky,et al.  Biobjective optimization for general oil field development , 2014 .

[29]  Andrew Forbes Alexander Hoadley,et al.  Optimisation of power stations with carbon capture plants – the trade-off between costs and net power , 2012 .

[30]  Howard J. Herzog,et al.  Dynamic Response of Monoethanolamine (MEA) CO2 Capture Units , 2012 .

[31]  A. J. Booker,et al.  A rigorous framework for optimization of expensive functions by surrogates , 1998 .

[32]  Mark Z. Jacobson,et al.  Supplementary Information for The Carbon Abatement Potential of High Penetration Intermittent Renewables , 2011 .

[33]  Howard J. Herzog,et al.  Using auxiliary gas power for CCS energy needs in retrofitted coal power plants , 2011 .

[34]  Gary T. Rochelle,et al.  Rate-Based Process Modeling Study of CO2 Capture with Aqueous Monoethanolamine Solution , 2009 .

[35]  A. F. Seibert,et al.  A dimensionless model for predicting the mass‐transfer area of structured packing , 2011 .

[36]  Andrew Forbes Alexander Hoadley,et al.  Using multi-objective optimisation in the design of CO2 capture systems for retrofit to coal power stations , 2012 .

[37]  Alexander W. Dowling,et al.  Coal Oxycombustion Power Plant Optimization Using First Principles and Surrogate Boiler Models , 2014 .

[38]  Gary T. Rochelle,et al.  Dynamic operation of amine scrubbing in response to electricity demand and pricing , 2009 .

[39]  Charles Audet,et al.  Multiobjective Optimization Through a Series of Single-Objective Formulations , 2008, SIAM J. Optim..

[40]  D. Maguire.  The raster GIS design model: a profile of ERDAS , 1992 .

[41]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  User Manual: Integrated Environmental Control Model , 2007 .

[42]  Jay H. Lee,et al.  Optimization of the various modes of flexible operation for post-combustion CO2 capture plant , 2015, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[43]  Nilay Shah,et al.  Identification of the cost-optimal degree of CO2 capture: An optimisation study using dynamic process models , 2013 .

[44]  Jon Gibbins,et al.  Initial evaluation of the impact of post-combustion capture of carbon dioxide on supercritical pulverised coal power plant part load performance , 2007 .

[45]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .

[46]  Gavin Towler,et al.  Chemical engineering design : principles, practice, and economics of plant and process design , 2008 .

[47]  Ali Abbas,et al.  HEN optimization for efficient retrofitting of coal-fired power plants with post-combustion carbon capture , 2011 .

[48]  Louis J. Durlofsky,et al.  Optimizing heat integration in a flexible coal–natural gas power station with CO2 capture , 2014 .

[49]  Nilay Shah,et al.  Flexible operation of solvent regeneration systems for CO2 capture processes using advanced control techniques: Towards operational cost minimisation , 2012 .

[50]  Filip De Turck,et al.  Blind Kriging: Implementation and performance analysis , 2012, Adv. Eng. Softw..