Geographic scale and disturbance influence intraspecific trait variability in leaves and roots of North American understorey plants

Considering intraspecific trait variability (ITV) in ecological studies has improved our understanding of species persistence and coexistence. These advances are based on the growing number of leaf ITV studies over local gradients, but logistical constraints have prevented a solid examination of ITV in root traits or at scales reflecting species’ geographic ranges. We compared the magnitude of ITV in above‐ and below‐ground plant organs across three spatial scales (biophysical region, locality and plot). We focused on six understorey species (four herbs and two shrubs) that occur both in disturbed and undisturbed habitats across boreal and temperate Canadian forests. We aimed to document ITV structure over broad ecological and geographical scales by asking: (a) What is the breadth of ITV across species range‐scale? (b) What proportion of ITV is captured at different spatial scales, particularly when local scale disturbances are considered? and (c) Is the variance structure consistent between analogous leaf and root traits, and between morphological and chemical traits? Following standardized methods, we sampled 818 populations across 79 forest plots simultaneously, including disturbed and undisturbed stands, spanning four biophysical regions (~5,200 km). Traits measured included specific leaf area (SLA), specific root length (SRL) and leaf and root nutrient concentrations (N, P, K, Mg, Ca). We used variance decomposition techniques to characterize ITV structure across scales. Our results show that an important proportion of ITV occurred at the local scale when sampling included contrasting environmental conditions resulting from local disturbance. A certain proportion of the variability in both leaf and root traits remained unaccounted for by the three sampling scales included in the design (36% on average), with the largest amount for SRL (54%). Substantial differences in magnitude of ITV were found among the six species, and between analogous traits, suggesting that trait distribution was influenced by species strategy and reflects the extent of understorey environment heterogeneity. Even for species with broad geographical distributions, a large proportion of within‐species trait variability can be captured by sampling locally across ecological gradients. This has practical implications for sampling design and trait selection for both local studies and continental‐scale modelling. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.

[1]  R. Irizarry ggplot2 , 2019, Introduction to Data Science.

[2]  B. Enquist,et al.  Adaptive diversification of growth allometry in the plant Arabidopsis thaliana , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  E. Hogg,et al.  Tree vulnerability to climate change: improving exposure‐based assessments using traits as indicators of sensitivity , 2018 .

[4]  B. Graae,et al.  Biotic and abiotic drivers of intraspecific trait variation within plant populations of three herbaceous plant species along a latitudinal gradient , 2017, BMC Ecology.

[5]  Nadejda A. Soudzilovskaia,et al.  Mapping local and global variability in plant trait distributions , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Julia I. Burton,et al.  Intraspecific variability and reaction norms of forest understorey plant species traits , 2017 .

[7]  Jens Kattge,et al.  A global Fine-Root Ecology Database to address below-ground challenges in plant ecology. , 2017, The New phytologist.

[8]  B. Enquist,et al.  Trait variation and integration across scales: is the leaf economic spectrum present at local scales? , 2017 .

[9]  G. Mohren,et al.  Towards a multidimensional root trait framework: a tree root review. , 2016, The New phytologist.

[10]  P. Bellingham,et al.  Root traits are multidimensional: specific root length is independent from root tissue density and the plant economic spectrum , 2016 .

[11]  D. Wardle,et al.  Shifts in Aboveground Biomass Allocation Patterns of Dominant Shrub Species across a Strong Environmental Gradient , 2016, PloS one.

[12]  A. Stokes,et al.  Root structure-function relationships in 74 species: evidence of a root economics spectrum related to carbon economy. , 2016, The New phytologist.

[13]  Anthony R. Taylor,et al.  Traits to stay, traits to move: a review of functional traits to assess sensitivity and adaptive capacity of temperate and boreal trees to climate change , 2016 .

[14]  Eric Garnier,et al.  Plant Functional Diversity: Organism traits, community structure, and ecosystem properties , 2016 .

[15]  Bill Shipley,et al.  Reinforcing loose foundation stones in trait-based plant ecology , 2016, Oecologia.

[16]  Christopher Baraloto,et al.  A global meta-analysis of the relative extent of intraspecific trait variation in plant communities. , 2015, Ecology letters.

[17]  Nicolas Gross,et al.  Traits of neighbouring plants and space limitation determine intraspecific trait variability in semi‐arid shrublands , 2015 .

[18]  M. Vellend,et al.  Understanding context dependence in the contribution of intraspecific variation to community trait-environment matching. , 2015, Ecology.

[19]  J. Cornelissen,et al.  Integrated plant phenotypic responses to contrasting above- and below-ground resources: key roles of specific leaf area and root mass fraction. , 2015, The New phytologist.

[20]  I. Aubin,et al.  Ecological controls on post‐fire vegetation assembly at multiple spatial scales in eastern North American boreal forests , 2015 .

[21]  W. Anderegg Spatial and temporal variation in plant hydraulic traits and their relevance for climate change impacts on vegetation. , 2015, The New phytologist.

[22]  L. Mommer,et al.  Going underground: root traits as drivers of ecosystem processes. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[23]  R. Sturrock,et al.  Effects of natural resource development on the terrestrial biodiversity of Canadian boreal forests 1 , 2014 .

[24]  Jens Kattge,et al.  The emergence and promise of functional biogeography , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Xihua Wang,et al.  Trait variability differs between leaf and wood tissues across ecological scales in subtropical forests , 2014 .

[26]  D. Young,et al.  Ecophysiology of the Herbaceous Layer in Temperate Deciduous Forests , 2014 .

[27]  D. Wardle,et al.  Changes in local‐scale intraspecific trait variability of dominant species across contrasting island ecosystems , 2014 .

[28]  M. Sykes,et al.  Species richness of limestone grasslands increases with trait overlap: evidence from within‐ and between‐species functional diversity partitioning , 2014 .

[29]  Eric Garnier,et al.  Are trait‐based species rankings consistent across data sets and spatial scales? , 2014 .

[30]  B. Enquist,et al.  Revisiting Darwin's hypothesis: Does greater intraspecific variability increase species' ecological breadth? , 2014, American journal of botany.

[31]  D. Wardle,et al.  The within‐species leaf economic spectrum does not predict leaf litter decomposability at either the within‐species or whole community levels , 2013 .

[32]  Raphaël Martin,et al.  Disentangling Coordination among Functional Traits Using an Individual-Centred Model: Impact on Plant Performance at Intra- and Inter-Specific Levels , 2013, PloS one.

[33]  David A. Wardle,et al.  Contrasting effects of plant inter‐ and intraspecific variation on community‐level trait measures along an environmental gradient , 2013 .

[34]  P. Reich,et al.  New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide , 2013 .

[35]  Bill Shipley,et al.  Inter‐specific and intra‐specific trait variation along short environmental gradients in an old‐growth temperate forest , 2013 .

[36]  D. Wardle,et al.  Plasticity in above- and belowground resource acquisition traits in response to single and multiple environmental factors in three tree species , 2013, Ecology and Evolution.

[37]  Peter M van Bodegom,et al.  A predictive model of community assembly that incorporates intraspecific trait variation. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[38]  A. Siefert Incorporating intraspecific variation in tests of trait-based community assembly , 2012, Oecologia.

[39]  Cyrille Violle,et al.  The return of the variance: intraspecific variability in community ecology. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[40]  J. Pausas,et al.  Local versus regional intraspecific variability in regeneration traits , 2012, Oecologia.

[41]  M. Hutchinson,et al.  Customized spatial climate models for North America , 2011 .

[42]  Ghislain Vieilledent,et al.  When and how should intraspecific variability be considered in trait-based plant ecology? , 2011 .

[43]  F. Piper,et al.  Intraspecific trait variation and covariation in a widespread tree species (Nothofagus pumilio) in southern Chile. , 2011, The New phytologist.

[44]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  A multi‐trait approach reveals the structure and the relative importance of intra‐ vs. interspecific variability in plant traits , 2010 .

[45]  J. Cornelissen,et al.  Coordinated variation in leaf and root traits across multiple spatial scales in Chinese semi-arid and arid ecosystems. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[46]  Lucien Hoffmann,et al.  Intraspecific variability and trait‐based community assembly , 2010 .

[47]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  Intraspecific functional variability: extent, structure and sources of variation , 2010 .

[48]  Christopher Baraloto,et al.  Functional trait variation and sampling strategies in species-rich plant communities , 2010 .

[49]  Hadley Wickham,et al.  ggplot2 - Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (2nd Edition) , 2017 .

[50]  L. Poorter,et al.  Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): a meta-analysis. , 2009, The New phytologist.

[51]  Joseph Hilbe,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2009 .

[52]  D. Wardle,et al.  Among- and within-species variation in plant litter decomposition in contrasting long-term chronosequences , 2009 .

[53]  Sandra Díaz,et al.  Scaling environmental change through the community‐level: a trait‐based response‐and‐effect framework for plants , 2008 .

[54]  Fernando Valladares,et al.  Ecological limits to plant phenotypic plasticity. , 2007, The New phytologist.

[55]  E. Thiffault,et al.  How do forest harvesting methods compare with wildfire? A case study of soil chemistry and tree nutrition in the boreal forest , 2007 .

[56]  C. Violle,et al.  Let the concept of trait be functional , 2007 .

[57]  Christian Messier,et al.  Overstory influences on light attenuation patterns and understory plant community diversity and composition in southern boreal forests of Quebec , 2006 .

[58]  Greg Spyreas The Herbaceous Layer in Forests of Eastern North America , 2006 .

[59]  David J. Mladenoff,et al.  SEVERE WIND AND FIRE REGIMES IN NORTHERN FORESTS: HISTORICAL VARIABILITY AT THE REGIONAL SCALE , 2005 .

[60]  C. Messier,et al.  Population structure and growth acclimation of mountain maple along a successional gradient in the southern boreal forest , 2005 .

[61]  N. Thiffault,et al.  Black spruce seedlings in a Kalmia-Vaccinium association: microsite manipulation to explore interactions in the field , 2004 .

[62]  Sean C. Thomas,et al.  The worldwide leaf economics spectrum , 2004, Nature.

[63]  Deborah Charlesworth,et al.  Introduction to plant population ecology , 1983, Vegetatio.

[64]  P. Reich,et al.  A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide , 2003 .

[65]  P. Reich,et al.  The Evolution of Plant Functional Variation: Traits, Spectra, and Strategies , 2003, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[66]  M. Westoby,et al.  ECOLOGICAL STRATEGIES : Some Leading Dimensions of Variation Between Species , 2002 .

[67]  P. Reich,et al.  Generality of leaf trait relationships: a test across six biomes: Ecology , 1999 .

[68]  Paul A. Keddy,et al.  Assembly and response rules: two goals for predictive community ecology , 1992 .

[69]  Herman H. Shugart,et al.  Environmental Factors and Ecological Processes in Boreal Forests , 1989 .

[70]  L. Flanagan,et al.  Seasonal and successional changes in light quality and quantity in the understory of boreal forest ecosystems , 1986 .

[71]  J. Rowe,et al.  Concepts of fire effects on plant individuals and species. , 1983 .

[72]  James A. Larsen,et al.  The Boreal Ecosystem , 1981 .

[73]  J. Lowther Use of a single sulphuric acid-hydrogen peroxide digest for the analysis of Pinus radiata needles. , 1980 .