Mobility Change in Two Types of Metamorphic Parallel Mechanisms

This paper presents a new joint coined as the rT joint and proposes two types of metamorphic parallel mechanisms assembled with this rT joint. In the first type, the mechanism changes its topology by turning the rT joints in all limbs into different configurations. This change in mobility is completed by two cases illustrated by a 3(rT)PS metamorphic parallel mechanism having variable mobility from 3 to 6 and a 3(rT)P(rT) parallel mechanism having various configurations including pure translations, pure rotations, and mobility 4. In the second type, a central strut with the rT joint is added in a parallel mechanism. The variable mobility of the mechanism results from the topological change of the central (rT)P(rT) strut. This is illustrated in a 3SPS-1 (rT)P(rT) metamorphic parallel mechanism, which changes its mobility from 4 to 5. It is demonstrated in mobility analysis that the change in local mobility of each limb results in the change in the platform mobility that a metamorphic process can be achieved. This particular analysis leads to advancement of improved Grubler-Kutzbach criterion by introducing the local mobility factor in the mobility analysis.

[1]  Clément Gosselin,et al.  Motion Simulation Capabilities of Three-Degree-of-Freedom Flight Simulators , 1998 .

[2]  Liping Wang,et al.  Mobility analysis of the 3-UPU parallel mechanism based on screw theory , 2004, 2004 International Conference on Intelligent Mechatronics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings..

[3]  J. Dai,et al.  Mobility in Metamorphic Mechanisms of Foldable/Erectable Kinds , 1998 .

[4]  L. Tsai,et al.  Kinematics and Optimization of a Spatial 3-UPU Parallel Manipulator , 2000 .

[5]  H. Lipkin,et al.  Mobility of Overconstrained Parallel Mechanisms , 2006 .

[6]  J. Dai,et al.  Geometric synthesis of spatial parallel manipulators with fewer than six degrees of freedom , 2002 .

[7]  Zhen Huang,et al.  Study on the kinematic characteristics of 3 DOF in-parallel actuated platform mechanisms , 1996 .

[8]  J. R. Jones,et al.  Matrix Representation of Topological Changes in Metamorphic Mechanisms , 2005 .

[9]  Bhaskar Dasgupta,et al.  The Stewart platform manipulator: a review , 2000 .

[10]  D. Stewart.  A Platform with Six Degrees of Freedom , 1965 .

[11]  Yacine Amirat,et al.  Analysis and design of a six-DOF parallel manipulator, modeling, singular configurations, and workspace , 1998, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[12]  Gim Song Soh,et al.  Parametric Design of a Spherical Eight-Bar Linkage Based on a Spherical Parallel Manipulator , 2009 .

[13]  M. Karouia,et al.  A Three-dof Tripod for Generating Spherical Rotation , 2000 .

[14]  K. H. Hunt,et al.  Structural Kinematics of In-Parallel-Actuated Robot-Arms , 1983 .

[15]  Clément Gosselin,et al.  Discretely Deformable Surface Based on Mechanical Interpolation: Application to the Design of a Dynamically Reconfigurable Theater Stage , 2009 .

[16]  Lung-Wen Tsai,et al.  Kinematic Analysis of 3-DOF Position Mechanisms for Use in Hybrid Kinematic Machines , 2002 .

[17]  Yuefa Fang,et al.  Structure synthesis of a class of 3-DOF rotational parallel manipulators , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation.

[18]  D. R. Kerr,et al.  Finite Twist Mapping and its Application to Planar Serial Manipulators with Revolute Joints , 1995 .

[19]  Xiao-Shan Gao,et al.  Generalized Stewart-Gough platforms and their direct kinematics , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[20]  Joseph Duffy,et al.  A Direct Determination of the Instantaneous Kinematics of Fully Parallel Robot Manipulators , 1985 .

[21]  Bruce Hannon,et al.  Dynamic Modeling , 1994, Springer US.

[22]  Giacomo Bianchi,et al.  A general approach for Self-locking Analysis in Closed Kinematic Chains , 2007 .

[23]  Zhen Huang,et al.  Kinematic characteristics analysis of 3 DOF in-parallel actuated pyramid mechanism☆ , 1996 .

[24]  J. Faugère,et al.  Combinatorial classes of parallel manipulators , 1995 .

[25]  Jian S. Dai,et al.  Interrelationship between screw systems and corresponding reciprocal systems and applications , 2001 .

[26]  Fuan Wen,et al.  Displacement analysis of the 6-6 stewart platform mechanisms , 1994 .

[27]  Kenneth J. Waldron,et al.  Kinematics, dynamics, and design of machinery , 1998 .

[28]  Larry L. Howell,et al.  Kinematic Representations of Pop-Up Paper Mechanisms , 2007 .

[29]  J. Merlet.  Jacobian, Manipulability, Condition Number and Accuracy of Parallel Robots , 2005, ISRR.

[30]  M. Husty.  An algorithm for solving the direct kinematics of general Stewart-Gough platforms , 1996 .

[31]  Vincenzo Parenti-Castelli,et al.  A Translational 3-dof Parallel Manipulator , 1998 .

[32]  Jian S. Dai,et al.  Reconfiguration of Spatial Metamorphic Mechanisms , 2009 .

[33]  S W E Earles,et al.  Forward Positional Analysis for the General 4–6 In-Parallel Platform , 1995 .

[34]  Jian S. Dai,et al.  A six-component contact force measurement device based on the Stewart platform , 2000 .

[35]  Jian Wang,et al.  Workspace evaluation of Stewart platforms , 1994, Adv. Robotics.

[36]  E F Fichter,et al.  A Stewart Platform- Based Manipulator: General Theory and Practical Construction , 1986 .

[37]  Jian S. Dai,et al.  Biological Modeling and Evolution Based Synthesis of Metamorphic Mechanisms , 2008 .