Network Structure Moderates Intergroup Differentiation of Stereotyped Rumors

The role of network structure in intergroup differentiation—the bipolarization of stereotypes that are defensive (ingroup-positive/outgroup-negative) and non-defensive (outgroup-positive/ingroup-negative)—was investigated using a Dynamic Social Impact Theory (DSIT) framework. Three computer-mediated laboratory social network experiments were pooled to test the interaction of network clustering (cliquish structure) and segregation (personal network homogeneity) on intergroup differentiation. Democrats and Republicans during the five months preceding the 2008 U.S. Presidential election, deaf and hearing persons, and women and men participated. Twenty-six 16-person groups (e.g., 8 Democrats, 8 Republicans) serially discussed nine controversial stereotyped rumors in lattice (unclustered) or “family” (clustered) network structures. Support was found for an Ingroup Echo Chamber Effect: segregation led to intergroup differentiation (stronger defensive belief, weaker non-defensive belief) in clustered, but not un...

[1]  Y. Kashima,et al.  Stereotypes help people connect with others in the community: a situated functional analysis of the stereotype consistency bias in communication. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  D. Maines Information Pools and Racialized Narrative Structures , 1999 .

[3]  M. Bourgeois,et al.  Self-organization of alcohol-related attitudes and beliefs in a campus housing complex: an initial investigation. , 2001, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[4]  Y. Kashima,et al.  Serial reproduction : an experimental simulation of cultural dynamics: 系列再生法 : 实验模拟文化动态 , 2010 .

[5]  Rupert Brown,et al.  Group Processes: Dynamics Within and Between Groups , 1988 .

[6]  Russ Wolfinger,et al.  Computing Gaussian Likelihoods and Their Derivatives for General Linear Mixed Models , 1994, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[7]  Bibb Latané,et al.  Strength and Number of Solicitors and the Urge toward Altruism , 1981 .

[8]  Andrew J. Younge,et al.  SOCIALSENSE: Graphical user interface design considerations for social network experiment software , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[9]  A. Hollingshead,et al.  From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm , 2004 .

[10]  S. Fiske Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. , 1998 .

[11]  Stuart Oskamp,et al.  Reducing prejudice and discrimination , 2000 .

[12]  K. Frank,et al.  Organizational Culture As a Complex System: Balance and Information in Models of Influence and Selection , 1999 .

[13]  R. Alba,et al.  Bonds of Pluralism: The Form and Substance of Urban Social Networks. , 1974 .

[14]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Agent-Based Modeling: A New Approach for Theory Building in Social Psychology , 2007, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[15]  John Scott What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[16]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  Social Influence Network Theory: A Sociological Examination of Small Group Dynamics , 2011 .

[17]  M. Hogg,et al.  Book Review: Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes , 1991 .

[18]  Bibb Latané,et al.  All alone in front of all those people: Stage fright as a function of number and type of co-performers and audience. , 1981 .

[19]  Traci Y. Craig,et al.  Beliefs in Conspiracies , 1999 .

[20]  Gün R. Semin,et al.  When Do We Communicate Stereotypes? Influence of the Social Context on the Linguistic Expectancy Bias , 2005 .

[21]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Situating Social Influence Processes: Dynamic, Multidirectional Flows of Influence Within Social Networks , 2007, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[22]  Andrew R. Binder,et al.  The Soul of a Polarized Democracy , 2009, Commun. Res..

[23]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[24]  Prashant Bordia,et al.  Rumors Influence: Toward a Dynamic Social Impact Theory of Rumor , 2007 .

[25]  R. Garrett Troubling Consequences of Online Political Rumoring , 2011 .

[26]  T. Postmes,et al.  Intergroup distinctiveness and differentiation: a meta-analytic integration. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  Linda R. Tropp,et al.  A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  H. Triandis Individualism-collectivism and personality. , 2001, Journal of personality.

[29]  B. Latané,et al.  The emergence of a social representation of human rights via interpersonal communication: empirical evidence for the convergence of two theories , 1998 .

[30]  Yoshihisa Kashima,et al.  How are stereotypes maintained through communication? The influence of stereotype sharedness. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  Janet B. Ruscher,et al.  Prejudice and Stereotyping in Everyday Communication , 1998 .

[32]  Michael D. Miller,et al.  Social impact in technologically-mediated communication: An examination of online influence , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[33]  Penny S. Visser,et al.  Social network composition and attitude strength: Exploring the dynamics within newly formed social networks , 2009 .

[34]  M. Macy,et al.  Complex Contagions and the Weakness of Long Ties1 , 2007, American Journal of Sociology.

[35]  L. Festinger Social pressures in informal groups : a study of human factors in housing / by Leon Festinger, Stanley Schachter and Kurt Back , 1950 .

[36]  Martin J. Bourgeois,et al.  Experimental Evidence for Dynamic Social Impact: The Emergence of Subcultures in Electronic Groups , 1996 .

[37]  Douglas S. Massey,et al.  Reflections on the Dimensions of Segregation , 2012, Social forces; a scientific medium of social study and interpretation.

[38]  Michael J. Weiss,et al.  The Clustered World : How We Live, What We Buy, and What It All Means About Who We Are , 2000 .

[39]  Michael T. Heaney,et al.  Polarized Networks , 2012 .

[40]  Jodie Woolcock,et al.  Group impressions as dynamic configurations: the tensor product model of group impression formation and change. , 2000, Psychological review.

[41]  Marvin D. Krohn,et al.  The Web of Conformity: A Network Approach to the Explanation of Delinquent Behavior , 1986 .

[42]  C. Butts Social network analysis: A methodological introduction , 2008 .

[43]  Charles M. Judd,et al.  The Consequences of Communicating Social Stereotypes , 2000 .

[44]  D. Myers,et al.  The group polarization phenomenon. , 1976 .

[45]  Leon Festinger,et al.  A Study of a Rumor: Its Origin and Spread , 1948 .

[46]  Yoshihisa Kashima,et al.  Maintaining stereotypes in communication: Investigating memory biases and coherence‐seeking in storytelling , 2006 .

[47]  D. Horowitz The Deadly Ethnic Riot , 2001 .

[48]  John C. Turner,et al.  Referent informational influence and group polarization. , 1989 .

[49]  Linda R. Tropp,et al.  Does intergroup contact reduce prejudice: Recent meta-analytic findings. , 2000 .

[50]  O. Klein,et al.  When the social becomes personal: Exploring the role of common ground in stereotype communication , 2010 .

[51]  R. A. Fisher,et al.  Statistical Tables for Biological, Agricultural and Medical Research , 1956 .

[52]  S. Moscovici,et al.  The group as a polarizer of attitudes. , 1969 .

[53]  B. Latané,et al.  Spatial clustering in the conformity game: Dynamic social impact in electronic groups. , 1996 .

[54]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  Uncertainty–Identity Theory , 2007 .

[55]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[56]  M. Brewer The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time , 1991 .

[57]  S. Levin,et al.  The dynamics of political polarization , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[58]  Bernard P. Brooks,et al.  Rumor clustering, consensus, and polarization: Dynamic social impact and self-organization of hearsay , 2013 .

[59]  P. S. Visser,et al.  Attitudes in the social context: the impact of social network composition on individual-level attitude strength. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[60]  H. Harton,et al.  Cultural Evolution: Interpersonal Influence, Issue Importance, and the Development of Shared Attitudes in College Residence Halls , 2007, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[61]  Jerry Suls,et al.  Handbook of social comparison : theory and research , 2000 .

[62]  E. Bott,et al.  Family and Social Network; Roles Norms, and External Relationships in Ordinary, Urban Families. , 1969 .

[63]  B. Latané The psychology of social impact. , 1981 .

[64]  Tom Wicker,et al.  Report of the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders , 1968 .

[65]  D. Mackie Social identification effects in group polarization. , 1986 .

[66]  Alain Degenne,et al.  Introducing Social Networks , 1999 .

[67]  Solomon E. Asch,et al.  Opinions and Social Pressure , 1955 .

[68]  B. Latané,et al.  From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. , 1990 .

[69]  M. Bourgeois,et al.  Attitudes Toward Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual College Students: The Contribution of Pluralistic Ignorance, Dynamic Social Impact, and Contact Theories , 2001, Journal of American college health : J of ACH.

[70]  Bill Bishop,et al.  The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America Is Tearing Us Apart , 2008 .

[71]  R. H. Knapp,et al.  A PSYCHOLOGY OF RUMOR , 1944 .

[72]  A. Lyons,et al.  iNTErgrOup iNfluENCES ON ThE STErEOTypE CONSiSTENCy BiaS iN COmmuNiCaTiON: DOES iT maTTEr whO wE arE COmmuNiCaTiNg aBOuT aND TO whOm wE arE COmmuNiCaTiNg? , 2009 .

[73]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Intergroup Misunderstandings : Impact of Divergent Social Realities , 2013 .

[74]  Prashant Bordia,et al.  How top PR professionals handle hearsay: corporate rumors, their effects, and strategies to manage them , 2000 .

[75]  Prashant Bordia,et al.  Psychological motivations in rumor spread , 2005 .

[76]  H. Tajfel Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. , 1978 .

[77]  J. Bargh,et al.  Nonconscious Behavioral Confirmation Processes: The Self-Fulfilling Consequences of Automatic Stereotype Activation , 1997 .

[78]  L. Postman,et al.  The psychology of rumor , 1947 .

[79]  Katharina Schmid,et al.  Social Identity and Intergroup Conflict , 2011 .

[80]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model , 2000 .

[81]  M. Bourgeois Heritability of Attitudes Constrains Dynamic Social Impact , 2002 .

[82]  Thomas F. Pettigrew,et al.  How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta‐analytic tests of three mediators , 2008 .

[83]  C. Tredoux,et al.  Patterns of Racial Segregation in University Residence Dining-Halls , 2005 .

[84]  P. Thagard,et al.  FORMING IMPRESSIONS FROM STEREOTYPES, TRAITS, AND BEHAVIORS : A PARALLEL-CONSTRAINT-SATISFACTION THEORY , 1996 .

[85]  Contrast and accentuation effects in category learning. , 1990 .

[86]  Gary Alan Fine,et al.  Whispers on the Color Line: Rumor and Race in America , 2001 .

[87]  Baron,et al.  Social Corroboration and Opinion Extremity , 1996, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[88]  P. Bonacich,et al.  The effect of network density and homogeneity on attitude polarization , 1990 .

[89]  Bibb Latané,et al.  Demonstrating Dynamic Social Impact: Consolidation, Clustering, Correlation, and (Sometimes) the Correct Answer , 1998 .

[90]  G. Stasser,et al.  Information salience and the discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: A “thought experiment”☆ , 1992 .

[91]  B. Latané Dynamic Social Impact: The Creation of Culture by Communication. , 1996 .

[92]  Hans Noel,et al.  Partisan Webs: Information Exchange and Party Networks , 2009, British Journal of Political Science.

[93]  P. Bordia,et al.  Rumor Psychology: Social and Organizational Approaches , 2006 .

[94]  L. Festinger A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[95]  Curtis D. Hardin,et al.  Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective. , 1996 .

[96]  H. Tajfel Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations , 1982 .

[97]  D. Haynie Delinquent Peers Revisited: Does Network Structure Matter?1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[98]  Cynthia M. Lakon,et al.  Social integration in friendship networks: the synergy of network structure and peer influence in relation to cigarette smoking among high risk adolescents. , 2012, Social science & medicine.

[99]  U. Bronfenbrenner The Mirror Image in Soviet‐American Relations: A Social Psychologist's Report , 2010 .

[100]  Jie Wu,et al.  Small Worlds: The Dynamics of Networks between Order and Randomness , 2003 .

[101]  E. Pronin,et al.  When Disagreement Gets Ugly: Perceptions of Bias and the Escalation of Conflict , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[102]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[103]  Tatsuya Kameda,et al.  Procedural influence in two-step group decision making : power of local majorities in consensus formation , 1995 .

[104]  Constantine Sedikides,et al.  Handbook of self-enhancement and self-protection , 2011 .