Airports at risk: the impact of information sources on security decisions

Security decisions in high risk organizations such as airports involve obtaining ongoing and frequent information about potential threats. Utilizing questionnaire survey data from a sample of airport employees in European Airports across the continent, we analyzed how both formal and informal sources of security information affect employee’s decisions to comply with the security rules and directives. This led us to trace information network flows to assess its impact on the degree employees making security decisions comply or deviate with the prescribed security rules. The results of the multivariate analysis showed that security information obtained through formal and informal networks differentially determine if employees will comply or not with the rules. Information sources emanating from the informal network tends to encourage employees to be more flexible in their security decisions while formal sources lead them to be more rigid with complying with rules and protocols. These results suggest that alongside the formal administrative structure of airports, there exists a diverse and pervasiveness set of informal communications networks that are a potent factor in determining airport security levels.

[1]  R M Schulz,et al.  Patient compliance—an overview , 1992, Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics.

[2]  R B Haynes,et al.  Patient compliance and the conduct and interpretation of therapeutic trials. , 1987, Controlled clinical trials.

[3]  John Hodge,et al.  The Informal Communication Network: Factors Influencing Grapevine Activity , 1998 .

[4]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  Informal Networks and Organizational Crises: An Experimental Simulation , 1988 .

[5]  John Leach,et al.  Improving user security behaviour , 2003, Comput. Secur..

[6]  Michael Willemyns,et al.  Trust me, I'm your boss: Trust and power in supervisor–supervisee communication , 2003 .

[7]  C. Butts,et al.  Responder Communication Networks in the World Trade Center Disaster: Implications for Modeling of Communication Within Emergency Settings , 2007 .

[8]  Coen Van Gulijk,et al.  Security Profiling of Airport Employees: Complying with the Rules , 2012 .

[9]  Nijaz Bajgoric,et al.  Business Continuity , 2011, Facilities Manager's Desk Reference 3e.

[10]  W. Keegan.  Multinational Scanning: A Study of the Information Sources Utilized by Headquarters Executives in Multinational Companies. , 1974 .

[11]  H Aberg,et al.  PATIENT COMPLIANCE , 1973, MMW, Munchener medizinische Wochenschrift.

[12]  Allen D. Blay,et al.  The impact of risk and affect on information search efficiency , 2012 .

[13]  David L. Banks,et al.  Social Network Methodology in the Study of Disasters: Issues and Insights Prompted by Post-Katrina Research , 2009 .

[14]  A. Kirschenbaum,et al.  Business continuity as an adaptive social process , 2008 .

[15]  G. Miller,et al.  The Role of Learning. , 1951 .

[16]  A Angenendt,et al.  Safety and security from the air traffic control services' point of view , 2003 .

[17]  Coen Van Gulijk,et al.  Airport security: An ethnographic study , 2012 .

[18]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Factors affecting perception of information security and their impacts on IT adoption and security practices , 2011, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[19]  Tejaswini Herath,et al.  Encouraging information security behaviors in organizations: Role of penalties, pressures and perceived effectiveness , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..

[20]  M. Handel,et al.  The sociology of organizations : classic, contemporary, and critical readings , 2003 .

[21]  Jose J. Gonzalez,et al.  The Role of Learning and Risk Perception in Compliance , 2003 .

[22]  R. W. Root,et al.  Informal Communication in Organizations: Form, Function, and Technology , 1990 .