Introduction to the research topic meaning in mind: semantic richness effects in language processing

The ultimate goal of reading is to extract meaning from printed words. However, the mechanisms that mediate orthography and semantics are not well-understood, and have rarely been implemented in computational models. To address this puzzle, one of the strategies cognitive scientists have begun to use is to examine semantic richness effects. Semantic richness effects refer to the finding that words associated with relatively more semantic information are recognized faster and more accurately, due to their possessing richer, better-specified semantic representations. Importantly, semantic richness is not a unitary concept. Instead, it draws on various theoretical perspectives and can vary along multiple dimensions. Thus, by examining which dimensions of semantic richness influence visual word recognition behavior, we gain insight about which theoretical perspectives seem to be promising descriptions of the process by which meaning is extracted from print. Our goal for this Frontiers Research Topic was to highlight the latest findings regarding semantic richness and theoretical developments on the issue of semantic processing. Our hope was to provide a forum for state-of-the-art research in this field, and to foster new theoretical advances. The 17 contributions that comprise the Research Topic certainly represent the state of the art; methodologies include ERP, fMRI, TMS, and behavioral approaches, and involve both intact and patient populations. Together, these contributions give rise to a number of inferences about semantic richness effects and implications of those effects for our understanding of semantic processing effects in visual word recognition.

[1]  M. Kiefer,et al.  Conceptual representations in mind and brain: Theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions , 2012, Cortex.

[2]  G. Vigliocco,et al.  The representation of abstract words: why emotion matters. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[3]  Michael N. Jones,et al.  The semantic richness of abstract concepts , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[4]  Daniel Mirman,et al.  Human Neuroscience Original Research Article a Combination of Thematic and Similarity-based Semantic Processes Confers Resistance to Deficit following Left Hemisphere Stroke , 2022 .

[5]  David A. Balota,et al.  Attentional Control and Flexible Lexical Processing : Explorations of the Magic Moment of Word Recognition , 2007 .

[6]  L. L. Jones,et al.  Different influences on lexical priming for integrative, thematic, and taxonomic relations , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[7]  Ron Borowsky,et al.  The cognitive chronometric architecture of reading aloud: semantic and lexical effects on naming onset and duration , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[8]  Mark J. Huff,et al.  An Abundance of Riches: Cross-Task Comparisons of Semantic Richness Effects in Visual Word Recognition , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[9]  Milena Rabovsky,et al.  The time course of semantic richness effects in visual word recognition , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[10]  M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Conceptual Structure within and between Modalities , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[11]  Paul D. Siakaluk,et al.  Effects of Emotional and Sensorimotor Knowledge in Semantic Processing of Concrete and Abstract Nouns , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[12]  C. Esopenko,et al.  A neuroanatomical examination of embodied cognition: semantic generation to action-related stimuli , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[13]  Ian S. Hargreaves,et al.  Does richness lose its luster? Effects of extensive practice on semantic richness in visual word recognition , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[14]  Penny M. Pexman,et al.  Flexible recruitment of semantic richness: context modulates body-object interaction effects in lexical-semantic processing , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[15]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Frontiers in Human Neuroscience , 2009 .

[16]  A. Woollams Apples are not the only fruit: the effects of concept typicality on semantic representation in the anterior temporal lobe , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[17]  Chris McNorgan,et al.  A meta-analytic review of multisensory imagery identifies the neural correlates of modality-specific and modality-general imagery , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[18]  Vanessa Taler,et al.  ERP measures of semantic richness: the case of multiple senses , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[19]  Ian S. Hargreaves,et al.  The neural correlates of the body-object interaction effect in semantic processing , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[20]  Penny M. Pexman,et al.  Human Neuroscience Original Research Article Oxytocin Receptor Genetic Variation Promotes Human Trust Behavior Materials and Methods , 2012 .

[21]  Penny M. Pexman,et al.  Richer concepts are better remembered: number of features effects in free recall , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..