A Method for Setting the Size of Plant Conservation Target Areas

Abstract: Realistic time frames in which management decisions are made often preclude the completion of the detailed analyses necessary for conservation planning. Under these circumstances, efficient alternatives may assist in approximating the results of more thorough studies that require extensive resources and time. We outline a set of concepts and formulas that may be used in lieu of detailed population viability analyses and habitat modeling exercises to estimate the protected areas required to provide desirable conservation outcomes for a suite of threatened plant species. We used expert judgment of parameters and assessment of a population size that results in a specified quasiextinction risk based on simple dynamic models. The area required to support a population of this size is adjusted to take into account deterministic and stochastic human influences, including small‐scale disturbance, deterministic trends such as habitat loss, and changes in population density through processes such as predation and competition. We set targets for different disturbance regimes and geographic regions. We applied our methods to Banksia cuneata, Boronia keysii, and Parsonsia dorrigoensis, resulting in target areas for conservation of 1102, 733, and 1084 ha, respectively. These results provide guidance on target areas and priorities for conservation strategies.

[1]  J. Elith.  Quantitative Methods for Modeling Species Habitat: Comparative Performance and an Application to Australian Plants , 2000 .

[2]  M. Burgman,et al.  Modelling the persistence of an apparently immortal Banksia species after fire and land clearing , 1999 .

[3]  D. Ludwig.  Is it meaningful to estimate a probability of extinction , 1999 .

[4]  P. White,et al.  PREDICTION OF RARE-PLANT OCCURRENCE: A SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN EXAMPLE , 1998 .

[5]  Amy W. Ando,et al.  On the Use of Demographic Models of Population Viability in Endangered Species Management , 1998 .

[6]  E. Menges.  Evaluating Extinction Risks in Plant Populations , 1998 .

[7]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Effectiveness of alternative heuristic algorithms for identifying indicative minimum requirements for conservation reserves , 1997 .

[8]  N. Klomp,et al.  Frontiers in ecology : building the links , 1997 .

[9]  J. Oostermeijer,et al.  Temporal and spatial variation in the demography of Gentiana pneumonanthe, a rare perennial herb , 1996 .

[10]  S. Pacala,et al.  Forest models defined by field measurements : Estimation, error analysis and dynamics , 1996 .

[11]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Optimality in reserve selection algorithms: When does it matter and how much? , 1996 .

[12]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  A Review of the Generic Computer Programs ALEX, RAMAS/space and VORTEX for Modelling the Viability of Wildlife Metapopulations , 1995 .

[13]  B. Taylor,et al.  The Reliability of Using Population Viability Analysis for Risk Classification of Species , 1995 .

[14]  Mark A. Burgman,et al.  Coping with uncertainty in forest wildlife planning , 1995 .

[15]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Conservation reserves in NSW: crown jewels or leftovers , 1995 .

[16]  F. A. Seiler,et al.  On the Selection of Distributions for Stochastic Variables , 1995 .

[17]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Ad Hoc Reservations: Forward or Backward Steps in Developing Representative Reserve Systems? , 1994 .

[18]  Ingrid M. Parker,et al.  Evaluating approaches to the conservation of rare and endangered plants , 1994 .

[19]  Graeme Caughley,et al.  Directions in conservation biology , 1994 .

[20]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  A framework for the improved management of threatened species based on Population Viability Analysis (PVA) , 1994 .

[21]  E. Johnson,et al.  Fire Frequency Models, Methods and Interpretations* , 1994 .

[22]  A. Lynch.  Conservation biology and management of 16 rare or threatened Fabaceae species in Tasmania , 1994 .

[23]  Scott Ferson,et al.  Risk assessment in conservation biology , 1993 .

[24]  J. Sauer.  [Software review] RAMAS/Stage: Generalized stage-based modeling for population dynamics , 1992 .

[25]  Mark A. Burgman,et al.  A stochastic model for the viability of Banksia cuneata populations : environmental, demographic and genetic effects , 1992 .

[26]  B. Lamont,et al.  Seed Bank and Population Dynamics of Banksia cuneata: The Role of Time, Fire, and Moisture , 1991, Botanical Gazette.

[27]  Eric S. Menges,et al.  Population Viability Analysis for an Endangered Plant , 1990 .

[28]  A. O. Nicholls,et al.  Measurement of the realized qualitative niche: environmental niches of five Eucalyptus species , 1990 .

[29]  M. Burgman,et al.  A stage-structured, stochastic population model for the giant kelpMacrocystis pyrifera , 1990 .

[30]  D. Keith.  Rare and biogeographically significant vascular plant species of the Eden region, south-eastern New South Wales: a listing for the 'fine-filter' approach , 1990 .

[31]  P. Slim,et al.  The contrasting dynamics of two populations of Plantago lanceolata L. classified by age and size. , 1988 .

[32]  A. O. Nicholls,et al.  Selecting networks of reserves to maximise biological diversity , 1988 .

[33]  J. D. Briggs,et al.  Rare or threatened Australian plants , 1988 .

[34]  L. Huenneke,et al.  Stem Dynamics of the Shrub Alnus Incana SSP. Rugosa: Transition Matrix Models , 1987 .

[35]  D. Raynal,et al.  POPULATION BIOLOGY OF AN ANNUAL PLANT IN A TEMPORALLY VARIABLE HABITAT , 1983 .

[36]  Paulette Bierzychudek,et al.  The Demography of Jack‐in‐the‐Pulpit, a Forest Perennial that Changes Sex , 1982 .

[37]  M. Shaffer.  Minimum Population Sizes for Species Conservation , 1981 .

[38]  G. Hartshorn.  A Matrix Model of Tree Population Dynamics , 1975 .