Macroscopic Skin Examination Can Determine the Number of Strips Necessary to Study the stratum corneum in Dogs

Simple Summary The skin barrier is the cornerstone of skin function. Evaluations of its morphological aspects, protein content and gene expression are necessary to study atopic dermatitis. Many human studies have assessed the presence of biomarkers in the skin of atopic patients. In dogs, previous biomarker studies have been performed using skin biopsies, which are invasive. This prospective blinded experimental pilot study aimed to evaluate the relevance of a noninvasive technique to extract information from the stratum corneum in dogs with the goal of facilitating future studies on atopic dermatitis. Abstract To evaluate the skin barrier, the stratum corneum (SC) must be isolated and extracted. Currently, skin biopsy is the gold standard method to investigate skin immunology and the presence of biomarkers in dogs. However, a standardized, non-invasive tool to exclusively remove the SC would be of great interest to study healthy and atopic dogs. In this study, we performed D-squames® tape stripping with standardized pressure on seven healthy beagle dogs. A control site was defined and then 25 strips, 50 strips and as many strips as needed to achieve a shiny appearance of the skin were performed on three different experimental sites. After stripping, blinded histopathological examination of a skin biopsy from each site was performed. The number of tape strips required for the skin to become shiny varied between individuals, with a mean of 40 (29–50) strips. There was no significant difference in SC depth between the control site and the site that underwent 25 tape strips. In contrast, the use of 50 strips removed almost all of the SC, with a mean remaining SC depth of 7.82 µm. These data suggest that this non-invasive method can effectively remove the SC, with individual variability, and that a shiny appearance of the skin after stripping can be used as an accurate marker of SC removal.

[1]  Alexander Roloff,et al.  Continuous Removal of Single Cell Layers by Tape Stripping the Stratum Corneum - a Histological Study. , 2023, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[2]  G. Yosipovitch,et al.  What can we learn from treating atopic itch in dogs? , 2022, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[3]  S. Kežić,et al.  Assessment of biomarkers in pediatric atopic dermatitis by tape strips and skin biopsies , 2021, Allergy.

[4]  T. Bieber,et al.  Biomarkers in atopic dermatitis—a review on behalf of the International Eczema Council , 2021, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[5]  E. O’Toole,et al.  Tape strips in dermatology research * , 2020, The British journal of dermatology.

[6]  T. Agner,et al.  Cytokine concentration across the stratum corneum in atopic dermatitis and healthy controls , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[7]  D. Leung,et al.  Skin Tape Sampling Technique Identifies Proinflammatory Cytokines in Atopic Dermatitis Skin. , 2020, Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology.

[8]  A. Paller,et al.  Use of Tape Strips to Detect Immune and Barrier Abnormalities in the Skin of Children With Early-Onset Atopic Dermatitis. , 2019, JAMA dermatology.

[9]  T. Agner,et al.  Advancement through epidermis using tape stripping technique and Reflectance Confocal Microscopy , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[10]  D. Rajpal,et al.  The Comparison of Skin Transcriptomes Confirms Canine Atopic Dermatitis Is a Natural Homologue to the Human Disease. , 2019, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[11]  E. Balslev,et al.  Skin tape stripping: Which layers of the epidermis are removed? , 2018, Contact dermatitis.

[12]  S. Kežić,et al.  A minimally invasive tool to study immune response and skin barrier in children with atopic dermatitis , 2018, The British journal of dermatology.

[13]  J. Sugama,et al.  A Comparison of Techniques for Collecting Skin Microbiome Samples: Swabbing Versus Tape-Stripping , 2018, Front. Microbiol..

[14]  S. Maeda,et al.  A review of the roles of keratinocyte‐derived cytokines and chemokines in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis in humans and dogs , 2017, Veterinary dermatology.

[15]  D. Rajpal,et al.  Early Activation of Th2/Th22 Inflammatory and Pruritogenic Pathways in Acute Canine Atopic Dermatitis Skin Lesions. , 2016, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[16]  D. Santoro,et al.  Canine and Human Atopic Dermatitis: Two Faces of the Same Host-Microbe Interaction. , 2016, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[17]  S. Kežić,et al.  Filaggrin breakdown products determine corneocyte conformation in patients with atopic dermatitis , 2015, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[18]  D. Pin,et al.  Characterization of the canine skin barrier restoration following acute disruption by tape stripping. , 2012, Veterinary dermatology.

[19]  T. Nuttall,et al.  A two-dimensional morphological study of corneocytes from healthy dogs and cats and from dogs with atopic dermatitis. , 2009, Veterinary dermatology.

[20]  José Juan Escobar-Chávez,et al.  The tape-stripping technique as a method for drug quantification in skin. , 2008, Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques.

[21]  P. Elsner,et al.  Acute barrier disruption by adhesive tapes is influenced by pressure, time and anatomical location: integrity and cohesion assessed by sequential tape stripping; a randomized, controlled study , 2007, The British journal of dermatology.

[22]  W. Sterry,et al.  Effect of the vehicle on the amount of stratum corneum removed by tape stripping , 2003, Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG.

[23]  C. Griffin,et al.  The ACVD task force on canine atopic dermatitis (I): incidence and prevalence. , 2001, Veterinary immunology and immunopathology.

[24]  H. Maibach,et al.  Physical and physiological effects of stratum corneum tape stripping , 2001, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[25]  V. Morhenn,et al.  A noninvasive method for quantifying and distinguishing inflammatory skin reactions. , 1999, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[26]  A. Kligman,et al.  A model to assess the efficacy of moisturizers – the quantification of soap‐induced xerosis by image analysis of adhesive‐coated discs (D‐Squames ®) , 1996, Clinical and experimental dermatology.

[27]  H. Pinkus,et al.  Examination of the Epidermis by the Strip Method: III. The Number of Keratin Cells in the Human Epidermis1 , 1956 .

[28]  H. Pinkus,et al.  Examination of the epidermis by the strip method of removing horny layers. I. Observations on thickness of the horny layer, and on mitotic activity after stripping. , 1951, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[29]  S. Kežić,et al.  Altered penetration of polyethylene glycols into uninvolved skin of atopic dermatitis patients. , 2007, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[30]  H. Boddé,et al.  A critical comparison of methods to quantify stratum corneum removed by tape stripping. , 1996, Skin pharmacology : the official journal of the Skin Pharmacology Society.