A visualization and data-sharing tool for ecosystem service maps: Lessons learnt, challenges and the way forward

A plurality in methods, models, terminologies is used to assess, quantify, map and communicate ecosystem services (ES). The Thematic Working Groups on Mapping (TWG4) and Modeling ES (TWG5) of the Ecosystem Service Partnership (ESP), recent literature and expert workshops, have highlighted the need for developing a platform that systematically organizes, visualizes and shares ES maps and related information. This led to the development of the Ecosystem Services Partnership Visualization Tool (ESP-VT), an open-access interactive platform that hosts a catalogue of ES maps with information on indicators, models and used data. Users can upload or download ES maps and associated information. ESP-VT aims at increasing transparency in ES mapping approaches to facilitate the flow of information within the ES community from academics to policy-makers and practitioners. Populating the ESP-VT with ES maps from different geographic locations, across different spatial scales, using different models and with various purposes, leads to a diverse and heterogeneous ES map library. The scientific community has not yet agreed on standards for ES terminology, methodologies and maps. However we do believe that populating and using the ESP-VT can set a basis for developing such standards and serve towards achieving interoperability among the varying ES related tools.

[1]  James W. Fickett,et al.  The GenBank genetic sequence databank , 1986, Nucleic Acids Res..

[2]  Daniel C. Dunn,et al.  Marine Geospatial Ecology Tools: An integrated framework for ecological geoprocessing with ArcGIS, Python, R, MATLAB, and C++ , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[3]  Roy Haines-Young,et al.  Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES): Consultation on Version 4, August-December 2012 , 2013 .

[4]  R. D. Groot,et al.  Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making , 2010 .

[5]  J. M. Hancock,et al.  Post-publication sharing of data and tools , 2009, Nature.

[6]  Mary E. Kentula,et al.  Where is the consensus? A proposed foundation for moving ecosystem service concepts into practice , 2012 .

[7]  David Flanagan,et al.  JavaScript: The Definitive Guide , 1996 .

[8]  Christina C. Hicks How Do We Value Our Reefs? Risks and Tradeoffs Across Scales in “Biomass-Based” Economies , 2011 .

[9]  Fergus L. Sinclair,et al.  Development and use of a typology of mapping tools to assess their fitness for supporting management of ecosystem service provision , 2014, Landscape Ecology.

[10]  Louise Willemen,et al.  Indicators for mapping ecosystem services: a review , 2012 .

[11]  B. Grizzetti,et al.  Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union , 2012 .

[12]  Gary W. Johnson,et al.  A Methodology for Adaptable and Robust Ecosystem Services Assessment , 2014, PloS one.

[13]  Jennifer L. Molnar,et al.  Marine Ecoregions of the World: A Bioregionalization of Coastal and Shelf Areas , 2007 .

[14]  J. Boyd,et al.  What are Ecosystem Services? The Need for Standardized Environmental Accounting Units , 2006 .

[15]  Roy Haines-Young,et al.  National Parks, buffer zones and surrounding lands: Mapping ecosystem service flows , 2013 .

[16]  Darius J. Semmens,et al.  A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation , 2013 .

[17]  P. Verburg,et al.  Quantifying and mapping ecosystem services: Demand and supply of pollination in the European Union , 2014 .

[18]  G. Powell,et al.  Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earth , 2001 .

[19]  C Burks,et al.  The GenBank genetic sequence data bank. , 1988, Nucleic acids research.

[20]  Louise Willemen,et al.  A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services , 2013 .

[21]  R. Costanza,et al.  Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Nengwang Chen,et al.  A GIS-based approach for mapping direct use value of ecosystem services at a county scale: Management implications , 2009 .

[23]  Miriah D. Meyer,et al.  Information visualisation for science and policy: engaging users and avoiding bias. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[24]  C. Tenopir,et al.  Data Sharing by Scientists: Practices and Perceptions , 2011, PloS one.

[25]  H. Wittmer,et al.  “Maps have an air of authority”: Potential benefits and challenges of ecosystem service maps at different levels of decision making , 2013 .

[26]  Leigh Gurney,et al.  Current Status and Future Prospects for the Assessment of Marine and Coastal Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Review , 2013, PloS one.

[27]  Yuqing Shi,et al.  A GIS-based approach for quantifying and mapping carbon sink and stock values of forest ecosystem: A case study , 2011 .

[28]  Regina O. Obe,et al.  PostgreSQL: Up and Running , 2012 .

[29]  Laura M. Norman,et al.  Developing an ecosystem services online decision support tool to assess the impacts of climate change and urban growth in the santa cruz watershed; where we live, work, and play , 2010 .

[30]  F. Müller,et al.  Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets , 2012 .

[31]  Dirk Vrebos,et al.  Chapter 14 – Ecosystem Service Assessments: Science or Pragmatism? , 2013 .

[32]  Aurélie Toillier,et al.  Livelihood Strategies and Land Use Changes in Response to Conservation: Pitfalls of Community-Based Forest Management in Madagascar , 2011 .

[33]  E. Gómez‐Baggethun,et al.  Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning , 2013 .

[34]  Barry W. Brook,et al.  Ecology Needs a Convention of Nomenclature , 2014 .

[35]  Ralf Seppelt,et al.  Form follows function? Proposing a blueprint for ecosystem service assessments based on reviews and case studies , 2012 .

[36]  Petina L. Pert,et al.  Participatory development of a new interactive tool for capturing social and ecological dynamism in conservation prioritization , 2013 .

[37]  Neville D. Crossman,et al.  Mapping and modelling ecosystem services for science, policy and practice , 2013 .

[38]  Pushpam Kumar,et al.  The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity : mainstreaming the economics of nature : a synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB , 2010 .