Task constraints and minimization of muscle effort result in a small number of muscle synergies during gait

Finding muscle activity generating a given motion is a redundant problem, since there are many more muscles than degrees of freedom. The control strategies determining muscle recruitment from a redundant set are still poorly understood. One theory of motor control suggests that motion is produced through activating a small number of muscle synergies, i.e., muscle groups that are activated in a fixed ratio by a single input signal. Because of the reduced number of input signals, synergy-based control is low dimensional. But a major criticism on the theory of synergy-based control of muscles is that muscle synergies might reflect task constraints rather than a neural control strategy. Another theory of motor control suggests that muscles are recruited by optimizing performance. Optimization of performance has been widely used to calculate muscle recruitment underlying a given motion while assuming independent recruitment of muscles. If synergies indeed determine muscle recruitment underlying a given motion, optimization approaches that do not model synergy-based control could result in muscle activations that do not show the synergistic muscle action observed through electromyography (EMG). If, however, synergistic muscle action results from performance optimization and task constraints (joint kinematics and external forces), such optimization approaches are expected to result in low-dimensional synergistic muscle activations that are similar to EMG-based synergies. We calculated muscle recruitment underlying experimentally measured gait patterns by optimizing performance assuming independent recruitment of muscles. We found that the muscle activations calculated without any reference to synergies can be accurately explained by on average four synergies. These synergies are similar to EMG-based synergies. We therefore conclude that task constraints and performance optimization explain synergistic muscle recruitment from a redundant set of muscles.

[1]  D. Sutherland The evolution of clinical gait analysis. Part II kinematics. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[2]  Matthew C. Tresch,et al.  The number and choice of muscles impact the results of muscle synergy analyses , 2013, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[3]  Stacie A. Chvatal,et al.  Decomposing Muscle Activity in Motor TasksMethods and Interpretation , 2010 .

[4]  M G Pandy,et al.  Static and dynamic optimization solutions for gait are practically equivalent. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Daniele Borzelli,et al.  Effort minimization and synergistic muscle recruitment for three-dimensional force generation , 2013, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[6]  Emanuel Todorov,et al.  Structured variability of muscle activations supports the minimal intervention principle of motor control. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Lena H. Ting,et al.  Optimization of Muscle Activity for Task-Level Goals Predicts Complex Changes in Limb Forces across Biomechanical Contexts , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[8]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Temporal components of the motor patterns expressed by the human spinal cord reflect foot kinematics. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Ilse Jonkers,et al.  The flexion synergy, mother of all synergies and father of new models of gait , 2013, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[10]  Francesco Lacquaniti,et al.  Plasticity and modular control of locomotor patterns in neurological disorders with motor deficits , 2013, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[11]  Andrea d'Avella,et al.  Differences in Adaptation Rates after Virtual Surgeries Provide Direct Evidence for Modularity , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  H. Sebastian Seung,et al.  Algorithms for Non-negative Matrix Factorization , 2000, NIPS.

[13]  I Jonkers,et al.  Kalman smoothing improves the estimation of joint kinematics and kinetics in marker-based human gait analysis. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  F.E. Zajac,et al.  An interactive graphics-based model of the lower extremity to study orthopaedic surgical procedures , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Francisco J. Valero Cuevas,et al.  Challenges and New Approaches to Proving the Existence of Muscle Synergies of Neural Origin , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[16]  Francesco Lacquaniti,et al.  Can modular strategies simplify neural control of multidirectional human locomotion? , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  Richard R Neptune,et al.  Merging of healthy motor modules predicts reduced locomotor performance and muscle coordination complexity post-stroke. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Wynne A. Lee,et al.  Neuromotor synergies as a basis for coordinated intentional action. , 1984, Journal of motor behavior.

[19]  J. Duysens Reflex control of locomotion as revealed by stimulation of cutaneous afferents in spontaneously walking premammillary cats. , 1977, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Richard R Neptune,et al.  The influence of merged muscle excitation modules on post-stroke hemiparetic walking performance. , 2013, Clinical biomechanics.

[21]  Ayman Habib,et al.  OpenSim: Open-Source Software to Create and Analyze Dynamic Simulations of Movement , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  W. Rymer,et al.  Endpoint force fluctuations reveal flexible rather than synergistic patterns of muscle cooperation. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  C. Vaughan,et al.  Phasic behavior of EMG signals during gait: Use of multivariate statistics. , 1993, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[24]  Sergey N Markin,et al.  Motoneuronal and muscle synergies involved in cat hindlimb control during fictive and real locomotion: a comparison study. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  Francis L. Merat,et al.  Introduction to robotics: Mechanics and control , 1987, IEEE J. Robotics Autom..

[26]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Five basic muscle activation patterns account for muscle activity during human locomotion , 2004, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  Arun Ramakrishnan,et al.  A simple experimentally based model using proprioceptive regulation of motor primitives captures adjusted trajectory formation in spinal frogs. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  F. Zajac,et al.  A planar model of the knee joint to characterize the knee extensor mechanism. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  Lena H Ting,et al.  A limited set of muscle synergies for force control during a postural task. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  Andrea d'Avella,et al.  Matrix factorization algorithms for the identification of muscle synergies: evaluation on simulated and experimental data sets. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  M. Tresch,et al.  The case for and against muscle synergies , 2022 .

[32]  A. Patla Some characteristics of EMG patterns during locomotion: implications for the locomotor control process. , 1985, Journal of motor behavior.

[33]  H. Sebastian Seung,et al.  Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization , 1999, Nature.

[34]  A. d’Avella,et al.  Locomotor Primitives in Newborn Babies and Their Development , 2011, Science.

[35]  Richard R Neptune,et al.  Three-dimensional modular control of human walking. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[36]  Christopher L. Vaughan,et al.  Fundamental patterns of bilateral muscle activity in human locomotion , 1995, Biological Cybernetics.

[37]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Coordination of Locomotion with Voluntary Movements in Humans , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  Andrea d'Avella,et al.  Modularity for Sensorimotor Control: Evidence and a New Prediction , 2010, Journal of motor behavior.

[39]  Jonathan P. Walter,et al.  Muscle synergies may improve optimization prediction of knee contact forces during walking. , 2014, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[40]  I Jonkers,et al.  A physiology-based inverse dynamic analysis of human gait using sequential convex programming: a comparative study , 2012, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[41]  Richard R Neptune,et al.  Modular control of human walking: a simulation study. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[42]  I Jonkers,et al.  A physiology based inverse dynamic analysis of human gait: potential and perspectives , 2009, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[43]  R. Crowninshield,et al.  A physiologically based criterion of muscle force prediction in locomotion. , 1981, Journal of biomechanics.

[44]  F. Zajac Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. , 1989, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.