A model-based analysis of the “combined-stimulation advantage”

[1]  H. Jeffreys.  A Treatise on Probability , 1922, Nature.

[2]  M. Pirenne,et al.  Binocular and Uniocular Threshold of Vision , 1943, Nature.

[3]  Harvey b. Fletcher,et al.  Speech and hearing in communication , 1953 .

[4]  D. M. Green,et al.  The effect of vocabulary size on articulation score , 1958 .

[5]  K. D. Kryter.  Methods for the Calculation and Use of the Articulation Index , 1962 .

[6]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[7]  S. G. Nooteboom,et al.  Intonation and the perceptual separation of simultaneous voices , 1982 .

[8]  B C Moore,et al.  Frequency selectivity and temporal resolution in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1985, British journal of audiology.

[9]  D G Pelli,et al.  Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[10]  A. Boothroyd,et al.  Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  A Boothroyd,et al.  Context effects in phoneme and word recognition by young children and older adults. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  A Faulkner,et al.  Residual frequency selectivity in the profoundly hearing-impaired listener. , 1990, British journal of audiology.

[13]  L. Braida.  Crossmodal Integration in the Identification of Consonant Segments , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[14]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[15]  D M Green,et al.  Probability of being correct with 1 ofM orthogonal signals , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  C. Darwin,et al.  Perceptual separation of simultaneous vowels: within and across-formant grouping by F0. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Chuan Yi Tang,et al.  A 2.|E|-Bit Distributed Algorithm for the Directed Euler Trail Problem , 1993, Inf. Process. Lett..

[18]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[19]  R. Carlyon.  Encoding the fundamental frequency of a complex tone in the presence of a spectrally overlapping masker. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  B C Moore,et al.  Comparison of real and simulated hearing impairment in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear hearing loss. , 1997, British journal of audiology.

[21]  L D Braida,et al.  Effects of token variability on our ability to distinguish between vowels , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  Michael I. Jordan.  Learning in Graphical Models , 1999, NATO ASI Series.

[23]  Michel Treisman,et al.  Combining Information: Probability Summation and Probability Averaging in Detection and Discrimination , 1998 .

[24]  R. Hartmann,et al.  Electric-Acoustic Stimulation of the Auditory System , 1999, ORL.

[25]  H Müsch,et al.  Using statistical decision theory to predict speech intelligibility. I. Model structure. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  T. Wickens.  Elementary Signal Detection Theory , 2001 .

[27]  C. Turner,et al.  Combining acoustic and electrical hearing , 2003 .

[28]  E. Jaynes.  Probability theory : the logic of science , 2003 .

[29]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: benefits of residual acoustic hearing. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  Teresa Y. C. Ching,et al.  Binaural Benefits for Adults Who Use Hearing Aids and Cochlear Implants in Opposite Ears , 2004, Ear and hearing.

[31]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Combining acoustic and electrical speech processing: Iowa/Nucleus hybrid implant , 2004, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[32]  Louis D Braida,et al.  Integration across frequency bands for consonant identification. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Expanding cochlear implant technology: combined electrical and acoustical speech processing , 2004, Cochlear implants international.

[34]  David J. C. MacKay,et al.  Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[35]  Jun Lu,et al.  An introduction to Bayesian hierarchical models with an application in the theory of signal detection , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[36]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  Philipos C. Loizou,et al.  Acoustic Simulations of Combined Electric and Acoustic Hearing (EAS) , 2005, Ear and hearing.

[38]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Unintelligible Low-Frequency Sound Enhances Simulated Cochlear-Implant Speech Recognition in Noise , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[39]  David Grayden,et al.  Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears. , 2006, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[40]  Jacob Oleson,et al.  Music Perception with Cochlear Implants and Residual Hearing , 2006, Audiology and Neurotology.

[41]  Bruce J. Gantz,et al.  Acoustic plus Electric Speech Processing: Preliminary Results of a Multicenter Clinical Trial of the Iowa/Nucleus Hybrid Implant , 2006, Audiology and Neurotology.

[42]  Michael K. Qin,et al.  Effects of introducing unprocessed low-frequency information on the reception of envelope-vocoder processed speech. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Fundamental frequency discrimination and speech perception in noise in cochlear implant simulations , 2007, Hearing Research.

[44]  Nasser M. Nasrabadi,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2006, Technometrics.

[45]  Ying-Yee Kong,et al.  Improved speech recognition in noise in simulated binaurally combined acoustic and electric stimulation. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  Philipos C Loizou,et al.  A glimpsing account for the benefit of simulated combined acoustic and electric hearing. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[47]  M. Liberman,et al.  Adding Insult to Injury: Cochlear Nerve Degeneration after “Temporary” Noise-Induced Hearing Loss , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[48]  Sid P. Bacon,et al.  Achieving Electric-Acoustic Benefit with a Modulated Tone , 2009, Ear and hearing.

[49]  T. Lenarz,et al.  Impact of Low-Frequency Hearing , 2009, Audiology and Neurotology.

[50]  Christopher A Brown,et al.  Low-frequency speech cues and simulated electric-acoustic hearing. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[51]  Sid P. Bacon,et al.  Fundamental frequency and speech intelligibility in background noise , 2010, Hearing Research.

[52]  Fei Chen,et al.  Contribution of Consonant Landmarks to Speech Recognition in Simulated Acoustic-Electric Hearing , 2010, Ear and hearing.

[53]  Deniz Başkent,et al.  Recognition of temporally interrupted and spectrally degraded sentences with additional unprocessed low-frequency speech , 2010, Hearing Research.

[54]  F. Zeng,et al.  Comparison of Bimodal and Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users on Speech Recognition With Competing Talker, Music Perception, Affective Prosody Discrimination, and Talker Identification , 2010, Ear and hearing.

[55]  L. Braida,et al.  Cross-frequency integration for consonant and vowel identification in bimodal hearing. , 2011, Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research.