Staphylococcus aureus with reduced glycopeptide susceptibility in Liverpool, UK.

OBJECTIVES To investigate if colonization with heterogeneous glycopeptide-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (hGISA) is associated with hGISA bacteraemia. METHODS Isolates of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) from blood cultures and from swabs to detect MRSA colonization were screened for reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides by an agar incorporation method. Isolates detected by this screen were tested for glycopeptide resistance by MacroEtest, standard MIC Etest methods and population analysis profile-AUC (PAP-AUC) analysis. S. aureus isolates with and without reduced glycopeptide susceptibility were characterized by PFGE and spa typing. RESULTS MRSA isolates with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides, as identified by the MacroEtest method, were detected in the colonization screens of 86 of 2550 MRSA-positive patients. The isolates were confirmed by Etest MIC and PAP-AUC analysis as hGISA. A total of 82/86 of the hGISA colonizing isolates were EMRSA-16 by PFGE; the remainder were EMRSA-15. Bacteraemia with hGISA was identified in five patients during the study period; two isolates were EMRSA-16 and three were EMRSA-15. hGISA colonization could not be linked to hGISA bacteraemia and hGISA bacteraemia could not be linked to hGISA colonization. Four of the five hGISA bacteraemias developed following teicoplanin therapy for a central venous catheter-associated MRSA bacteraemia. CONCLUSIONS Laboratory strategies to reduce morbidity associated with hGISA should focus on testing for hGISA in bacteraemic (rather than colonizing) MRSA isolates in patients with recurrent S. aureus bacteraemia following glycopeptide exposure.

[1]  G. Smith,et al.  In vivo development of heterogeneous glycopeptide-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (hGISA), GISA and daptomycin resistance in a patient with meticillin-resistant S. aureus endocarditis. , 2009, Journal of medical microbiology.

[2]  P. Appelbaum Reduced glycopeptide susceptibility in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). , 2007, International journal of antimicrobial agents.

[3]  A. MacGowan,et al.  A Multicenter Study Evaluating the Current Strategies for Isolating Staphylococcus aureus Strains with Reduced Susceptibility to Glycopeptides , 2006, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[4]  G. Woods,et al.  Clinical Evaluation of the DiversiLab Microbial Typing System Using Repetitive-Sequence-Based PCR for Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus Strains , 2005, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[5]  B. Cookson,et al.  Emergence, Spread, and Characterization of Phage Variants of Epidemic Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus 16 in England and Wales , 2004, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[6]  J. Andrews BSAC standardized disc susceptibility testing method (version 8). , 2004, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[7]  M. Kaufmann,et al.  Harmonization of Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis Protocols for Epidemiological Typing of Strains of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a Single Approach Developed by Consensus in 10 European Laboratories and Its Application for Tracing the Spread of Related Strains , 2003, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[8]  C. Vandenbroucke-Grauls,et al.  Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Control in Hospitals: The Dutch Experience , 1996, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[9]  C. Watanakunakorn In-vitro selection of resistance of Staphylococcus aureus to teicoplanin and vancomycin. , 1990, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[10]  Identification and Characterization of Phage Variants of a Strain of Epidemic Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (EMRSA-15) , 2022 .