Comparison of the Success Rate of Treatment with Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention PCI versus Thrombolytic Treatment in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Local Hospitals in Iran

[1]  R. Manka,et al.  Comparison of Instant Thrombolysis Plus Early PCI And Primary PCI in STEMI Patients, View of CMR Early After Reperfusion Therapy , 2013 .

[2]  H. Bueno,et al.  Are Elderly Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes Undertreated? Data from Euro Heart Survey on ACS III Registry , 2013 .

[3]  D. Dvir,et al.  The impact of intracoronary thrombus aspiration on STEMI outcomes. , 2012, Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions.

[4]  T. Henry,et al.  Safety and efficacy of a pharmaco-invasive reperfusion strategy in rural ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients with expected delays due to long-distance transfers. , 2012, European heart journal.

[5]  C. Vrints,et al.  Contemporary mortality differences between primary percutaneous coronary intervention and thrombolysis in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. , 2011, Archives of internal medicine.

[6]  M. Maeng,et al.  The Danish multicentre randomized study of fibrinolytic therapy vs. primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction (the DANAMI-2 trial): outcome after 3 years follow-up. , 2007, European heart journal.

[7]  J. Ottervanger,et al.  Primary percutaneous coronary intervention versus thrombolytic treatment: long term follow up according to infarct location , 2005, Heart.

[8]  R. Califf,et al.  Risk of intracranial haemorrhage with combined fibrinolytic and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy in acute myocardial infarction. Dichotomous response as a function of age in the GUSTO V trial. , 2003, European heart journal.

[9]  Baris Gencer,et al.  ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation , 2011 .