Life Experiences with Using Community Care among People with Severe Physical Disabilities: A Comparative Analysis between South Korea and Japan

This study identified the pathways chosen by people with severe physical disabilities (PWSPD) in South Korea and Japan in using community care throughout their life and compared their experiences while navigating these pathways from their perspective. A concurrent nested mixed-method design was adopted. Quantitative data analysis included pathway mapping of facilities and services used throughout their lives. For qualitative data, interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) was applied. Eleven South Korean (congenital 7, acquired 4) and nine Japanese (congenital 6, acquired 3) participants were surveyed and interviewed. Pathway mapping was conducted by classifying the participants into focus groups. South Korean participants took nine years more than the Japanese participants to reach independence and showed different pathway characteristics. Superordinate themes from the IPA provided insight into the differences in experiences between PWSPD of the two countries: (1) accessibility and continuity of medical services; (2) experience of vocational training; (3) way and degree of social support for independent living; (4) care planning for receiving comprehensive services. In developing a community care model for the PWSPD to accelerate their time to independence, the government should strive for accessibility and connectivity of medical services, strengthen vocational training, social support for independent living, and information provision for the PWSPD.

[1]  S. Jaglal,et al.  Facilitators and barriers to supporting individuals with spinal cord injury in the community: experiences of family caregivers and care recipients , 2020, Disability and rehabilitation.

[2]  G. Kempen,et al.  Definitions, key themes and aspects of ‘ageing in place’: a scoping review , 2020, Ageing and Society.

[3]  Yoshimi Fukuoka,et al.  A new conceptual model of experiences of aging in place in the United States: Results of a systematic review and meta-ethnography of qualitative studies. , 2019, International journal of nursing studies.

[4]  L. Villa-Torres,et al.  Experiences with rehabilitation and impact on community participation among adults with physical disability in Colombia: perspectives from stakeholders using a community based research approach , 2019, International Journal for Equity in Health.

[5]  K. Musselman,et al.  The experiences of physical rehabilitation in individuals with spinal cord injuries: a qualitative thematic synthesis , 2019, Disability and rehabilitation.

[6]  C. Unsworth,et al.  The experience of attempting to return to work following spinal cord injury: a systematic review of the qualitative literature , 2018, Disability and rehabilitation.

[7]  B. Gabbe,et al.  Experiences With Navigating and Managing Information in the Community Following Spinal Cord Injury. , 2018, Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

[8]  H. Bourke-Taylor,et al.  Facilitators and barriers to social and community participation following spinal cord injury. , 2016, Australian occupational therapy journal.

[9]  B. Christian.  Translational Research--Addressing the Challenge of Healthcare Transitions for Adolescents With Special Health Care Needs. , 2015, Journal of pediatric nursing.

[10]  Jonathan A. Smith.  Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods , 2015 .

[11]  E. Hay-Smith,et al.  “The final piece of the puzzle to fit in”: an interpretative phenomenological analysis of the return to employment in New Zealand after spinal cord injury , 2013, Disability and rehabilitation.

[12]  Vicki L. Plano Clark,et al.  Best practices in mixed methods for quality of life research , 2012, Quality of Life Research.

[13]  N. Westgren,et al.  Returning to work after spinal cord injury: exploring young adults' early expectations and experience , 2011, Disability and rehabilitation.

[14]  Jonathan A. Smith,et al.  Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research , 2009, QMiP Bulletin.

[15]  T. Terao.  Services and Supports for Persons with Disabilities Act , 2008 .

[16]  Kathleen M. T. Collins,et al.  A Typology of Mixed Methods Sampling Designs in Social Science Research , 2007 .

[17]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[18]  D. Kewman,et al.  Factors affecting employment following spinal cord injury: A qualitative study. , 2001 .

[19]  W. Velicer,et al.  The Transtheoretical Model of Health Behavior Change , 1997, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[20]  Richard H. Hycner.  Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data , 1985 .

[21]  C. Unsworth,et al.  The experience of seeking, gaining and maintaining employment after traumatic spinal cord injury and the vocational pathways involved. , 2018, Work.

[22]  J. Vessey,et al.  Opportunities lost and found: experiences of patients with cerebral palsy and their parents transitioning from pediatric to adult healthcare. , 2014, Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine.

[23]  Seanne Wilkins,et al.  Guidelines for critical review form - Qualitative studies (version 2.0), McMaster University Occupational Therapy Evidence-Based Practice Research Group , 2007 .