Monitoring kinetic and frequency-domain properties of eyelid responses in mice with magnetic distance measurement technique.

Classical eye-blink conditioning in mutant mice can be used to study the molecular mechanisms underlying associative learning. To measure the kinetic and frequency domain properties of conditioned (tone - periorbital shock procedure) and unconditioned eyelid responses in freely moving mice, we developed a method that allows adequate, absolute, and continuous determination of their eyelid movements in time and space while using an electrical shock as the unconditioned stimulus. The basic principle is to generate a local magnetic field that moves with the animal and that is picked up by either a field-sensitive chip or coil. With the use of this magnetic distance measurement technique (MDMT), but not with the use of electromyographic recordings, we were able to measure mean latency, peak amplitude, velocity, and acceleration of unconditioned eyelid responses, which equaled 7.9 +/- 0.2 ms, 1.2 +/- 0.02 mm, 28.5 +/- 1 mm/s, and 637 +/- 22 mm/s(2), respectively (means +/- SD). During conditioning, the mice reached an average of 78% of conditioned responses over four training sessions, while animals that were subjected to randomly paired conditioned and unconditioned stimuli showed no significant increases. The mean latency of the conditioned responses decreased from 222 +/- 40 ms in session 2 to 127 +/- 6 ms in session 4, while their mean peak latency increased from 321 +/- 45 to 416 +/- 67 ms. The mean peak amplitudes, peak velocities, and peak acceleration of these responses increased from 0.62 +/- 0.02 to 0.77 +/- 0.02 mm, from 3.9 +/- 0.3 to 7.7 +/- 0.5 mm/s, and from 81 +/- 7 to 139 +/- 10 mm/s(2), respectively. Power spectra of acceleration records illustrated that both the unconditioned and conditioned responses of mice had oscillatory properties with a dominant peak frequency close to 25 Hz that was not dependent on training session, interstimulus interval, or response size. These data show that MDMT can be used to measure the kinetics and frequency domain properties of conditioned eyelid responses in mice and that these properties follow the dynamic characteristics of other mammals.

[1]  C. Evinger,et al.  Lid Restraint Evokes Two Types of Motor Adaptation , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  S. Kawahara,et al.  Impairment of eyeblink conditioning in GluRδ2‐mutant mice depends on the temporal overlap between conditioned and unconditioned stimuli , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.

[3]  C. Yeo,et al.  Acquisition of Eyeblink Conditioning Is Critically Dependent on Normal Function in Cerebellar Cortical Lobule HVI , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  B. Torres,et al.  Eye-movement recording in freely moving animals , 2001, Physiology & Behavior.

[5]  M. Mintz,et al.  Involvement of the amygdala in classical conditioning of eyeblink response in the rat , 2001, Brain Research.

[6]  A. Gruart,et al.  Cerebellar posterior interpositus nucleus as an enhancer of classically conditioned eyelid responses in alert cats. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  M. Mauk,et al.  Cerebellar function: Coordination, learning or timing? , 2000, Current Biology.

[8]  Javier F. Medina,et al.  Timing Mechanisms in the Cerebellum: Testing Predictions of a Large-Scale Computer Simulation , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  Catalin V. Buhusi,et al.  Timing for the absence of a stimulus: the gap paradigm reversed. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[10]  E. Gould,et al.  The modulation of Pavlovian memory , 2000, Behavioural Brain Research.

[11]  B G Schreurs,et al.  Kinetic and frequency-domain properties of reflex and conditioned eyelid responses in the rabbit. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  J. Disterhoft,et al.  Cholinergic facilitation of trace eyeblink conditioning in aging rabbits. , 1999, Life sciences.

[13]  G. Hesslow,et al.  Cerebellum and Learning: A Complex Problem , 1998, Science.

[14]  J. A. Domingo,et al.  Quantal organization of reflex and conditioned eyelid responses. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  Younglim Lee,et al.  Role of the Hippocampus, the Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis, and the Amygdala in the Excitatory Effect of Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone on the Acoustic Startle Reflex , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Richard E Thompson,et al.  Cerebellar circuits and synaptic mechanisms involved in classical eyeblink conditioning , 1997, Trends in Neurosciences.

[17]  Christopher H. Yeo,et al.  Trigeminal Inputs to Eyeblink Motoneurons in the Rabbit , 1996, Experimental Neurology.

[18]  Lucien T. Thompson,et al.  Trace eyeblink conditioning in rabbits demonstrates heterogeneity of learning ability both between and within age groups , 1996, Neurobiology of Aging.

[19]  S. Bao,et al.  Impaired classical eyeblink conditioning in cerebellar-lesioned and Purkinje cell degeneration (pcd) mutant mice , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[20]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  Deficient Cerebellar Long-Term Depression, Impaired Eyeblink Conditioning, and Normal Motor Coordination in GFAP Mutant Mice , 1996, Neuron.

[21]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  Impaired motor coordination correlates with persistent multiple climbing fiber innervation in PKCγ mutant mice , 1995, Cell.

[22]  J. N. Bleicher,et al.  Evaluation of the Hall-Effect Sensor for Determination of Eyelid Closure in Vivo , 1995, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[23]  G. Collingridge,et al.  Motor deficit and impairment of synaptic plasticity in mice lacking mGluR1 , 1994, Nature.

[24]  S. Tonegawa,et al.  Deficient cerebellar long-term depression and impaired motor learning in mGluR1 mutant mice , 1994, Cell.

[25]  J. Delgado-García,et al.  Kinematic analyses of classically-conditioned eyelid movements in the cat suggest a brain stem site for motor learning , 1994, Neuroscience Letters.

[26]  M. Mauk,et al.  Cerebellar cortex lesions disrupt learning-dependent timing of conditioned eyelid responses , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[27]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Disruption of classical eyelid conditioning after cerebellar lesions: damage to a memory trace system or a simple performance deficit? , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[28]  M. Mauk,et al.  Learning-dependent timing of Pavlovian eyelid responses: differential conditioning using multiple interstimulus intervals. , 1992, Behavioral neuroscience.

[29]  C Weiss,et al.  Stress-induced facilitation of classical conditioning. , 1992, Science.

[30]  Joseph E LeDoux,et al.  Differential contribution of amygdala and hippocampus to cued and contextual fear conditioning. , 1992, Behavioral neuroscience.

[31]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  The effects of age on eyeblink conditioning in the freely moving Fischer-344 rat , 1991, Neurobiology of Aging.

[32]  T. Korhonen.  Three-dimensional Hall effect accelerometer for recording head movements of freely moving laboratory animals , 1991, Physiology & Behavior.

[33]  C. Evinger,et al.  Eyelid movements. Mechanisms and normal data. , 1991, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[34]  R. Baker,et al.  Behavior of accessory abducens and abducens motoneurons during eye retraction and rotation in the alert cat. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  J. Welsh,et al.  Cerebellar lesions and the nictitating membrane reflex: performance deficits of the conditioned and unconditioned response , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[36]  A. Fuchs,et al.  Lid-eye coordination during vertical gaze changes in man and monkey. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  V. V. Fanardjian,et al.  Mechanisms regulating the activity of facial nucleus motoneurons—III. Synaptic influences from the cerebral cortex and subcortical structures , 1987, Neuroscience.

[38]  John F. Disterhoft,et al.  Eyeball retraction latency in the conscious rabbit measured with a new photodiode technique , 1984, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[39]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Cerebellum: essential involvement in the classically conditioned eyelid response. , 1984, Science.

[40]  T. Arts,et al.  Measurement of deformation of canine epicardium in vivo during cardiac cycle. , 1980, The American journal of physiology.

[41]  Javier F. Medina,et al.  Computer simulation of cerebellar information processing , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[42]  A. Pastor,et al.  Involvement of cerebellar cortex and nuclei in the genesis and control of unconditioned and conditioned eyelid motor responses. , 1997, Progress in brain research.

[43]  Karen A. Manning,et al.  Mechanisms and Normal Data , 1991 .

[44]  R. Renterghem.  Aortic valve geometry during the cardiac cycle , 1983 .