Modélisation de la phase d'exploration du processus de conception de produits, pour une créativité augmentée

La recherche en conception de produits aboutit a des methodologies et des outils dans le but d'ameliorer innovation et creativite. Dans ce contexte, notre recherche propose un modele de la phase d'exploration du processus de conception de produits; bien que cruciales pour la suite du processus de conception, les phases amont etaient jusqu'a present peu decrites, en partie car elles impliquent des operations cognitives difficilement observables. Notre recherche s'est appuyee sur la mise en œuvre d'un protocole experimental compose de questionnaires, d'entretiens et de simulations d'activites de conception, realise avec la participation de designers professionnels. Cette demarche a permis de decrire les strategies de recherche d'informations et d'images par les designers dans la phase d'exploration du processus de conception et de montrer que le raisonnement creatif amont s'appuie principalement sur les informations visuelles. L'impact des images sur la creativite en design a ensuite ete etudie, en particulier en fonction du secteur d'influence de l'image (architecture, mode

[1]  Peter Armstrong,et al.  Talking design: negotiating the verbal–visual translation , 1998 .

[2]  Remko van der Lugt,et al.  RELATING THE QUALITY OF THE IDEA GENERATION PROCESS TO THE QUALITY OF THE RESULTING DESIGN IDEAS , 2003 .

[3]  V. Ross,et al.  A Model of Inventive Ideation. , 2006 .

[4]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  Development of a Method for Assessing Design Creativity , 2007 .

[5]  K. Dunbar,et al.  How analogies are generated: The roles of structural and superficial similarity , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[6]  Todd Lubart,et al.  How can computers be partners in the creative process: Classification and commentary on the Special Issue , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[7]  Ann Heylighen,et al.  A case base of Case-Based Design tools for architecture , 2001, Comput. Aided Des..

[8]  F. Jackson Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change , 1993 .

[9]  Ernest A. Edmonds,et al.  The studio as laboratory: Combining creative practice and digital technology research , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[10]  Eleven lessons : managing design in eleven global companies , 2007 .

[11]  Gerd Fricke,et al.  Successful approaches in dealing with differently precise design problems , 1999 .

[12]  Ann Heylighen,et al.  Chasing concepts during design: A photo shoot from the field of architecture , 2005, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[13]  B. Lawson Schemata, gambits and precedent: some factors in design expertise , 2004 .

[14]  Willemien Visser,et al.  Two functions of analogical reasoning in design: a cognitive-psychology approach , 1996 .

[15]  Yasuhiro Yamamoto,et al.  Interaction design of tools for fostering creativity in the early stages of information design , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[16]  Ben Jonson,et al.  Design ideation: the conceptual sketch in the digital age , 2005 .

[17]  Pierre Denis Levy,et al.  Interdisciplinary design for the cyberspace by an approach in kansei information : methodology and workgroup communication tool design , 2006 .

[18]  Anath Fischer,et al.  New Trends in Rapid Product Development , 2002 .

[19]  Remko van der Lugt,et al.  How sketching can affect the idea generation process in design group meetings , 2005 .

[20]  Pd Pierre Lévy,et al.  Towards a definition of Kansei , 2006 .

[21]  Teng-Wen Chang,et al.  A distributed linking system for supporting idea association during the conceptual design stage , 2006 .

[22]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Structure of Ill Structured Problems , 1973, Artif. Intell..

[23]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution , 2001 .

[24]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  Oracles, draughtsmen, and agents: the nature of knowledge and creativity in design and the role of IT , 2005 .

[25]  Remko van der Lugt,et al.  Developing a graphic tool for creative problem solving in design groups , 2000 .

[26]  Christian Brassac,et al.  Those "psychological tools" inside the design process , 2000, Knowl. Based Syst..

[27]  Linda Candy,et al.  Representations of strategic knowledge in design , 1998, Knowl. Based Syst..

[28]  Michael Tovey,et al.  Styling and design: intuition and analysis in industrial design☆ , 1997 .

[29]  M. Göker The effects of experience during design problem solving , 1997 .

[30]  C. Bouchard,et al.  Modélisation du processus de style automobile : Méthode de veille stylistique adaptée au désign du composant d'aspect , 1997 .

[31]  Yu-Tung Liu Personal Versus Cultural Cognitive Models of Design Creativity , 1998 .

[32]  Michael A. and Gero John S. Rosenman,et al.  Creativity in Design Using a Prototype Approach , 1989 .

[33]  Shingo Takada,et al.  Finding the 'Right' Image: Visualizing Relationships among persons, Images and Impressions , 1998, Designing Effective and Usable Multimedia Systems.

[34]  Uday A. Athavankar,et al.  Mental Imagery as a Design Tool , 1997, Cybern. Syst..

[35]  Anne Bruseberg,et al.  New product development by eliciting user experience and aspirations , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[36]  Liane Gabora,et al.  Cognitive mechanisms underlying the creative process , 2002, Creativity & Cognition.

[37]  D. A. Schon Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation , 1992 .

[38]  Matthijs Dekker,et al.  Exploring the use of consumer collages in product design , 2003 .

[39]  Jonathan Evans,et al.  Problem-solving Strategies and Expertise in Engineering Design. , 1997 .

[40]  Renate Eisentraut Styles of problem solving and their influence on the design process , 1999 .

[41]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Analysing design activity , 1996 .

[42]  Gilles Halin,et al.  A Method for Constructing a Reference Image Database to Assist with Design Process. Application to the Wooden Architecture Domain , 2005 .

[43]  Design Creativity and Personal Characteristics , 2005 .

[44]  Fabrice Mantelet,et al.  Prise en compte de la perception émotionnelle du consommateur dans le processus de conception de produits , 2006 .

[45]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  On visual design thinking: the vis kids of architecture , 1994 .

[46]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified , 1990 .

[47]  Ellen Yi-Luen Do,et al.  Intentions in and relations among design drawings , 2000 .

[48]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  Expertise and the use of visual analogy: implications for design education , 1999 .

[49]  Yi-Cheng Chiang,et al.  The Role of Design Eureka in Design Thinking , 2006 .

[50]  R. Eisentraut,et al.  Individual styles of problem solving and their relation to representations in the design process , 1997 .

[51]  Saeema Ahmed,et al.  Encouraging reuse of design knowledge: a method to index knowledge , 2005 .

[52]  Sydney Pollack Sketches of Frank Gehry , 2007 .

[53]  Stella Vosniadou,et al.  Similarity and analogical reasoning: a synthesis , 1989 .

[54]  E. Edmonds,et al.  Representations of Design Thinking-A Review of Recent Studies , 2003 .

[55]  Anne Bruseberg,et al.  Focus groups to support the industrial/product designer: a review based on current literature and designers' feedback. , 2002, Applied ergonomics.

[56]  Andy Dong,et al.  Concept formation as knowledge accumulation: A computational linguistics study , 2006, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[57]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Creative cognition in design: processes of exceptional designers , 2002, Creativity & Cognition.

[58]  Shang H. Hsu,et al.  A semantic differential study of designers’ and users’ product form perception , 2000 .

[59]  Améziane Aoussat,et al.  Computer-Supported Creativity: Evaluation of a Tabletop Mind-Map Application , 2007, HCI.

[60]  Yu-Tung Liu,et al.  Creativity or novelty , 2000 .

[61]  Rivka Oxman,et al.  The thinking eye: visual re-cognition in design emergence , 2002 .

[62]  Philippe Vadcard,et al.  Aide a la programmation de l'utilisation des outils en conception de produit , 1996 .

[63]  Bernhard Wilpert,et al.  Psychology and design processes , 2005 .

[64]  J. Restrepo,et al.  Studying Design Engineers use of Information Systems: Which variables to control for? , 2006 .

[65]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design , 1994 .

[66]  A. Dong The enactment of design through language , 2007 .

[67]  Ted Selker Fostering motivation and creativity for computer users , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[68]  Linden J. Ball,et al.  Representing design rationale to support innovative design reuse: a minimalist approach , 2001 .

[69]  Gert Pasman,et al.  Designing with precedents , 2003 .

[70]  Pamela I. Ansburg,et al.  Creative and analytic thinkers differ in their use of attentional resources , 2003 .

[71]  Willemien Visser,et al.  Both Generic Design and Different Forms of Designing , 2006, ArXiv.

[72]  Nathalie Bonnardel,et al.  Towards supporting evocation processes in creative design: A cognitive approach , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[73]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Solution driven versus problem driven design: strategies and outcomes , 2006 .

[74]  Carole Bouchard,et al.  A KANSEI BASED IMAGE RETRIEVAL SYSTEM BASED ON THE CONJOINT TRENDS ANALYSIS METHOD , 2007 .

[75]  Masaki Suwa,et al.  Unexpected discoveries and S-invention of design requirements , 2000 .

[76]  Rüdiger von der Weth Design instinct?—the development of individual strategies , 1999 .

[77]  Rivka Oxman,et al.  Design media for the cognitive designer , 2000 .

[78]  Nuno Seco,et al.  The importance of retrieval in creative design analogies , 2006, Knowl. Based Syst..

[79]  Matti Perttula,et al.  Time Cycle Effects in Design Ideation , 2005 .

[80]  John S. Gero,et al.  To sketch or not to sketch? That is the question , 2006 .

[81]  Matti Perttula,et al.  Idea generation in engineering design : application of a memory search perspective and some experimental studies , 2006 .

[82]  Y Wang,et al.  Bringing Clay and Sand into Digital Design — Continuous Tangible user Interfaces , 2004 .

[83]  Carole Bouchard,et al.  TRENDS: a content-based information retrieval system for designers , 2010, SIGGRAPH '10.

[84]  Daniel Brissaud,et al.  Co-Ordination Between Product and Process Definitions in a Concurrent Engineering Environment , 2000 .

[85]  Ann Heylighen,et al.  Close encounters of the architectural kind , 2003 .

[86]  Henri Christiaans,et al.  Give me an Example: Supporting the Creative Designer , 2004 .

[87]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  Computers, words and pictures , 1997 .

[88]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Descriptive models of creative design: application to an example , 1997 .

[89]  Donald A. Sch The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action , 1983 .

[90]  Wim Muller,et al.  Typology and the organization of design knowledge , 1996 .

[91]  Carole Bouchard,et al.  Analysis of the correlation between words and design elements for the generation of a Kansei engineering system , 2005, WSTST.

[92]  J. Floch Sémiotique, marketing et communication : sous les signes, les stratégies , 1990 .

[93]  E. P. Torrance Un résumé historique du développement des tests de pensée créative de Torrance , 2004 .

[94]  Yasuhiro Yamamoto,et al.  Computational support for collective creativity , 2000, Knowl. Based Syst..

[95]  Francisco Câmara Pereira Creativity and Artificial Intelligence , 2007 .

[96]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Winning by design: the methods of Gordon Murray, racing car designer , 1996 .

[98]  Hilary Johnson,et al.  Supporting creative and reflective processes , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[99]  Linden J. Ball,et al.  Spontaneous analogising in engineering design: a comparative analysis of experts and novices , 2004 .

[100]  P. Lloyd,et al.  Can concurrent verbalization reveal design cognition , 1995 .

[101]  Kazuhisa Miwa,et al.  Interactive processes between mental and external operations in creative activity: a comparison of experts' and novices' performance , 2002, Creativity & Cognition.

[102]  Shih-Wen Hsiao,et al.  A creativity-based design process for innovative product design , 2004 .

[103]  Patrick Y. K. Chau,et al.  Does knowledge reuse make a creative person more creative? , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[104]  H.H.C.M. Christiaans,et al.  Creativity in design: the role of domain knowledge in designing , 1992 .

[105]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  Fortune Favours Only the Prepared Mind: Why Sources of Inspiration are Essential for Continuing Creativity , 1998 .

[106]  Sonya S. Kwak,et al.  Problem-Solving Model of Design With a Controllable Problem-Solving Model of Design With a Controllable Determinization Level Determinization Level , 2007 .

[107]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  Towards an ‘ideal’ approach for concept generation , 2003 .

[108]  Ernest Edmonds,et al.  Representing strategic design knowledge , 1996 .

[109]  Caroline Hummels,et al.  Move to get moved: a search for methods, tools and knowledge to design for expressive and rich movement-based interaction , 2007, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[110]  B. Weil,et al.  La thorie C-K : Fondements et usages d'une thorie unifie de la conception , 2002 .

[111]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  What designers know , 2018, The Design Student’s Journey.

[112]  Jin Sun-Tai,et al.  Diverse Characteristics in Design Problem Solving : A Case Study of Disciplinary Comparisons , 2009 .

[113]  John S. Gero,et al.  The structure of concurrent cognitive actions: a case study on novice and expert designers , 2002 .

[114]  Yan Li,et al.  Design creativity in product innovation , 2007 .

[115]  J. Gero Computational Models of Innovative and Creative Design Processes , 2000 .

[116]  John S. Gero,et al.  A computational framework for concept formation for a situated design agent , 2000, Knowl. Based Syst..

[117]  John S. Gero,et al.  Creativity, emergence and evolution in design , 1996, Knowl. Based Syst..

[118]  Howard Denton,et al.  Exploring the degree to which individual students share a common perception of specific mood boards: observations relating to teaching, learning and team-based design , 2005 .

[119]  Nathalie Bonnardel,et al.  Towards understanding and supporting creativity in design: analogies in a constrained cognitive environment , 2000, Knowl. Based Syst..

[120]  Linda Candy,et al.  Creative design of the Lotus bicycle: implications for knowledge support systems research , 1996 .

[121]  A. Guénand,et al.  ADEX: A TOOL FOR A COMMON REPRESENTATION OF DESIGN CONCEPTS AND DESIGN ARGUMENTATION IN A CROSS-DISCIPLINE COLLABORATION , 2004 .

[122]  Michael Tovey,et al.  Sketching and direct CAD modelling in automotive design , 2000 .

[123]  Mougenot Céline,et al.  A Study of Designers' Cognitive Activity in Design Informational Phase , 2007 .

[124]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Creating creativity: user interfaces for supporting innovation , 2000, TCHI.

[125]  Henri Christiaans,et al.  INFORMATION PROCESSING IN DESIGN: A THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL PERSPECTIVE , 2001 .

[126]  David G. Ullman,et al.  The Mechanical Design Process , 1992 .

[127]  Emcj Emile Quanjel,et al.  Design decision support for the conceptual phase of the design process , 2007 .

[128]  Franca Giannini,et al.  Aesthetic-driven tools for industrial design , 2006 .

[129]  Hisataka Noguchi An idea generation support system for industrial designers (idea sketch processor) , 1997, Knowl. Based Syst..

[130]  Shingo Takada,et al.  Hands-on representations in a two-dimensional space for early stages of design , 2000, Knowl. Based Syst..

[131]  Winslow Burleson,et al.  Developing creativity, motivation, and self-actualization with learning systems , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[132]  R Hanna,et al.  An inquiry into computers in design: attitudes before–attitudes after , 2001 .

[133]  Dokshin Lim,et al.  Development of a KANSEI ENGINEERING SYSTEM for Industrial design : Identification of input data for KES , 2003 .

[134]  S. G. Wallas The Art of Thought. Harcourt Brace & World Inc. 1926 , 1970 .

[135]  T. Fisher The Designer's Self‐Identity — Myths of Creativity and the Management of Teams , 1997 .

[136]  G. Goldschmidt,et al.  How good are good ideas? Correlates of design creativity , 2005 .

[137]  T. Purcell,et al.  Mental synthesis and creativity in design: an experimental examination , 2000 .

[138]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Powers of observation in creative design , 1996 .

[139]  Ross A. Malaga The effect of stimulus modes and associative distance in individual creativity support systems , 2000, Decis. Support Syst..

[140]  Victor V. Kryssanov,et al.  Understanding design fundamentals: how synthesis and analysis drive creativity, resulting in emergence , 2001, Artif. Intell. Eng..

[141]  Thomas T. Hewett,et al.  Informing the design of computer-based environments to support creativity , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[142]  Kumiyo Nakakoji,et al.  Meanings of Tools, Support, and Uses for Creative Design Processes , 2006 .

[143]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  Sources of inspiration: a language of design , 2000 .

[144]  E. Edmonds,et al.  The cognitive basis of emergence: implications for design support , 1996 .

[145]  Crispin Hales,et al.  Engineering design: a systematic approach , 1989 .

[146]  John Restrepo,et al.  From function to context to form: precedents and focus shifts in the form creation process , 2005, C&C '05.

[147]  Anthony Williams,et al.  A New look at Design Thinking: Research in Progress , 2006 .

[148]  Glen Mullineux,et al.  A framework for the requirements of capturing, storing and reusing information and knowledge in engineering design , 2002, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[149]  John S. Gero,et al.  Using analogy to extend the behaviour state space in creative design , 1999 .

[150]  Fredrik Hacklin,et al.  Design, product development, innovation: all the same in the end? A short discussion on terminology , 2005 .

[151]  Pieter Jan Stappers,et al.  Creative connections: user, designer, context, and tools , 2006, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[152]  T. M. Amabile The social psychology of creativity , 1984 .

[153]  J. Gero,et al.  The impact of working memory limitations on the design process during conceptualization , 2007 .

[154]  Robert Newman,et al.  Sketching, concept development and automotive design , 2003 .

[155]  Yan Jin,et al.  Study of mental iteration in different design situations , 2006 .

[156]  Sabrina Kacher,et al.  Proposition d'une méthode de référencement d'images pour assister la conception architecturale: application à la recherche d'ouvrages , 2005 .

[157]  Deana McDonagh,et al.  Signs, symbols, and subjectivity: An alternative view of the visual , 2005 .

[158]  Henri Christiaans,et al.  DESIGN REQUIREMENTS: CONDITIONERS OR CONDITIONED? , 2003 .

[159]  Belinda López-Mesa,et al.  On the significance of cognitive style and the selection of appropriate design methods , 2006 .

[160]  Pieter Jan Stappers,et al.  Direct talkback in computer supported tools for the conceptual stage of design , 2005, Knowl. Based Syst..

[161]  H Casakin,et al.  Evaluating Creativity in Design Problem Solving , 2006 .

[162]  Thomas J. Howard,et al.  Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature , 2008 .

[163]  Carole Bouchard,et al.  CREATIVITY IN DESIGN - HOW DESIGNERS GATHER INFORMATION IN THE "PREPARATION" PHASE , 2007 .

[164]  Henri Christiaans,et al.  Creativity in Design Engineering and the Role of Knowledge: Modelling the Expert , 2005 .

[165]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  Variances in the impact of visual stimuli on design problem solving performance , 2006 .

[166]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  Text analysis for constructing design representations , 1997, Artif. Intell. Eng..

[167]  Matti Perttula,et al.  The idea exposure paradigm in design idea generation , 2007 .

[168]  Yukari Nagai,et al.  How designers transform keywords into visual images , 2002, Creativity & Cognition.

[169]  L. Anolli,et al.  Accessing Source Information in Analogical Problem-Solving , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[170]  Future Systems,et al.  For Inspiration ONLY , 1996 .

[171]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness , 2003 .