Objective video quality metrics for HDTV services: A survey

The exponential growth of video traffic is expected to reach 62% of the global Internet traffic by the end of 2015 [1]. This presents as a significant challenge for the television service providers who need to employ networking technologies to monitor specific Quality of Service (QoS) parameters such as packet loss rate, jitter and delay, to ensure an acceptable level of quality. However, recent research has demonstrated that the quality experienced by the end-user does not correlate to the QoS parameters employed by most service providers [2]. This paper investigates the correlation between the QoS parameters and the quality perceived by the end. user. These results indicate that although the QoS parameters may sometimes achieve high correlation with respect to the quality perceived by the viewer, they still have large variances. This suggests that the QoS parameters are not enough to quantify the subjective quality with a high level of confidence. This work further compares a number of existing objective video quality metrics. The results presented in this paper show that the Full-Reference Motion based Video Integrity Evaluation (MOVIE) metric and the Spatio-Temporal Reduced Reference Entropic Differences (STRRED) metric achieve excellent correlation with the subjective scores. This research also demonstrates that the STRRED metric and its derivatives have several advantages over the MOVIE metric since less information needs to be transmitted and it is less computationally intensive.

[1]  Touradj Ebrahimi Quality of multimedia experience: past, present and future , 2009, MM '09.

[2]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Image information and visual quality , 2006, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[3]  Margaret H. Pinson,et al.  A new standardized method for objectively measuring video quality , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[4]  Christophe Charrier,et al.  A DCT Statistics-Based Blind Image Quality Index , 2010, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[5]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  A Two-Step Framework for Constructing Blind Image Quality Indices , 2010, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[6]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  A subjective study to evaluate video quality assessment algorithms , 2010, Electronic Imaging.

[7]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Information Content Weighting for Perceptual Image Quality Assessment , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[8]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment , 2003, The Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, 2003.

[9]  Sheila S. Hemami,et al.  VSNR: A Wavelet-Based Visual Signal-to-Noise Ratio for Natural Images , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[10]  Reuben A. Farrugia,et al.  A Support Vector Machine Approach for Detection and Localization of Transmission Errors Within Standard H.263++ Decoders , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[11]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[12]  David Zhang,et al.  FSIM: A Feature Similarity Index for Image Quality Assessment , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[13]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Blind Image Quality Assessment: From Natural Scene Statistics to Perceptual Quality , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[14]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  RRED Indices: Reduced Reference Entropic Differencing for Image Quality Assessment , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[15]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Reduced-reference image quality assessment using a wavelet-domain natural image statistic model , 2005, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[16]  Rajiv Soundararajan,et al.  Study of Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Video , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[17]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  No-Reference Image Quality Assessment in the Spatial Domain , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.