Attentional capture by working memory contents.

There has been controversy on whether working memory (WM) contents automatically guide attention. The present study tried to replicate the effect of WM-based attentional capture using an adaption of Downing's (2000) paradigm, in which WM and attentional capture were combined. Subjects were presented with an attention display containing two objects, one of which could be precued by a matching item being held in WM. As measured by a probe discrimination task, the memory-matching object had a privileged status to capture attention regardless of the stimulus onset asynchronies between the memory cue and the attention display, even when there was absolutely no benefit for subjects to bias attention in favour of the memory match. These results suggest that WM contents guide attention in an involuntary manner. The implications of current findings for understanding of WM effects on visual selection are discussed.

[1]  David Soto,et al.  Automatic guidance of visual attention from verbal working memory. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Dissociating the neural mechanisms of memory-based guidance of visual selection , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  J Duncan,et al.  Responses of neurons in macaque area V4 during memory-guided visual search. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  G. Woodman,et al.  Do the contents of visual working memory automatically influence attentional selection during visual search? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Mika Koivisto,et al.  How Meaning Shapes Seeing , 2007, Psychological science.

[6]  David Soto,et al.  The modulation of perceptual selection by working memory is dependent on the focus of spatial attention , 2010, Vision Research.

[7]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[9]  Min-Shik Kim,et al.  Do the contents of working memory capture attention? Yes, but cognitive control matters. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Associative knowledge controls deployment of visual selective attention , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  P. Downing,et al.  Interactions Between Visual Working Memory and Selective Attention , 2000, Psychological science.

[12]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[14]  John Duncan,et al.  A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex , 1993, Nature.

[15]  Harold Pashler,et al.  Working memory and the guidance of visual attention: Consonance-driven orienting , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[16]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms for visual memory and their role in attention. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Stressing the mind: The effect of cognitive load and articulatory suppression on attentional guidance from working memory , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  Dietmar Heinke,et al.  Working memory can guide pop-out search , 2006, Vision Research.

[19]  C. Bundesen.  A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[20]  David Soto,et al.  Short article: Dimension-based working memory-driven capture of visual selection , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: visual working memory content affects visual attention. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.