Simultaneous tracking of catheters and guidewires: comparison to standard fluoroscopic guidance for arterial cannulation.

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this in vitro study was to clinically assess the feasibility of a three-dimensional (3D) electromagnetic (EM) navigator, including sensorized catheters and guidewires, to determine any reduction in radiation dose and contrast medium injection. METHODS The study was performed using a navigator prototype developed at the EndoCAS center. The system includes catheters and guidewires simultaneously tracked with an EM localizer (Aurora, Northern Digital, Waterloo, Canada). Tests were performed on a commercial abdominal aortic aneurysm model. Fifteen operators were asked to cannulate renal arteries using the conventional fluoroscopic guidance and the EM navigator without fluoroscopic support. Each trial was video-recorded and analyzed for timing and success of completing the cannulation task by two blinded and independent observers. Performances were also qualitatively evaluated using the Imperial College Endovascular Cannulation Scoring Tool (IC3ST). Moreover, a questionnaire was administered to participants to evaluate the navigator potentialities. RESULTS Quantitative analysis results show no significant difference between the fluoroscopic and EM guidance regarding the total procedure time (median 2.36 minutes [interquartile range {IQR} = 1.26-4.7) vs. 2.95 min [IQR = 1.35-5.38], respectively; p = .93); number of total hits with catheter/guidewire tip to vessels wall (median 5.50 [IQR = 2.00-10.00] vs. 3.50 [IQR = 2.50-7.00], respectively; p = .65); and number of attempts at cannulation (median 4.0 [IQR = 2.00-5.00] vs. 4.0 [IQR = 2.00-5.00], respectively; p = .72]. Moreover, there was no significant difference between the IC3ST score obtained using the EM navigator and the traditional method (average 22.37 [STD = 7.95] vs. 21.58 [STD = 6.86]; p = .92). Finally, questionnaire results indicate a general agreement concerning the navigator usefulness, which clearly shows the positions of instruments inside the 3D model of the patient's anatomy. Participants also agreed that the navigator can reduce the amount of contrast media delivered to the patient, as well as fluoroscopy time. CONCLUSIONS This work provides proof of concept that simultaneous EM navigation of guidewires and catheters is feasible without the use of live fluoroscopic images.

[1]  Marie-Odile Berger,et al.  3D Augmented Fluoroscopy in Interventional Neuroradiology: Precision Assessment and First Evaluation on Clinical Cases , 2006 .

[2]  C. Bicknell,et al.  Evaluation of an electromagnetic 3D navigation system to facilitate endovascular tasks: a feasibility study. , 2012, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[3]  Thomas M Krummel,et al.  Simulation-based endovascular skills assessment: the future of credentialing? , 2008, Journal of vascular surgery.

[4]  Mauro Ferrari,et al.  Value of multidetector computed tomography image segmentation for preoperative planning in general surgery , 2011, Surgical Endoscopy.

[5]  N. Cheshire,et al.  The role of robotic endovascular catheters in fenestrated stent grafting. , 2009, Journal of vascular surgery.

[6]  J. McClelland,et al.  A continuous 4D motion model from multiple respiratory cycles for use in lung radiotherapy. , 2006, Medical physics.

[7]  Sara Condino,et al.  Electromagnetic navigation platform for endovascular surgery: how to develop sensorized catheters and guidewires , 2012, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[8]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Respiratory motion analysis: Towards gated augmentation of the liver , 2005 .

[9]  M. Bock,et al.  MR‐guided intravascular interventions: Techniques and applications , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  N. Cheshire,et al.  Evaluation of robotic endovascular catheters for arch vessel cannulation. , 2011, Journal of vascular surgery.

[11]  Kawal S. Rhode,et al.  An Adaptive and Predictive Respiratory Motion Model for Image-Guided Interventions: Theory and First Clinical Application , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  Daniel Ruijters,et al.  Validation of 3D multimodality roadmapping in interventional neuroradiology , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  Celia Riga,et al.  Improved Catheter Navigation With 3D Electromagnetic Guidance , 2013, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[14]  Philippe Cinquin,et al.  A virtual reality based navigation system for endovascular surgery. , 2004, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[15]  Sara Condino,et al.  Electromagnetic navigation system for endovascular surgery , 2010 .

[16]  P. Schneider Endovascular Skills: Guidewire and Catheter Skills for Endovascular Surgery , 2008 .

[17]  D. Caramella,et al.  3D ultrasound centerline tracking of abdominal vessels for endovascular navigation , 2013, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[18]  YingLiang Ma,et al.  A subject-specific technique for respiratory motion correction in image-guided cardiac catheterisation procedures , 2009, Medical Image Anal..