Automatic prediction of flexible regions improves the accuracy of protein-protein docking models
暂无分享,去创建一个
Lingyun Yang | Xu Huang | Hongjie Wu | Qiang Lü | Xiaohu Luo | Peide Qian | Gang Fu | Lingyun Yang | Hongjie Wu | Peide Qian | Qiang Lü | Xiaohu Luo | Xu Huang | Gang Fu
[1] W. Kabsch,et al. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical features , 1983, Biopolymers.
[2] David Baker,et al. Protein-protein docking with backbone flexibility. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.
[3] C. Anfinsen. Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. , 1973, Science.
[4] P. Bork,et al. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes , 2002, Nature.
[5] Jeffrey J. Gray,et al. Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.
[6] O. Schueler‐Furman,et al. Improved side‐chain modeling for protein–protein docking , 2005, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[7] Victoria A. Higman,et al. Uncovering network systems within protein structures. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.
[8] Anders Liljas,et al. Recognition of structural domains in globular proteins , 1974 .
[9] Colin A. Smith,et al. Backrub-like backbone simulation recapitulates natural protein conformational variability and improves mutant side-chain prediction. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.
[10] James R. Knight,et al. A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2000, Nature.
[11] Ruth Nussinov,et al. Automatic prediction of protein interactions with large scale motion , 2007, Proteins.
[12] M. Zacharias,et al. Accounting for loop flexibility during protein–protein docking , 2005, Proteins.
[13] Ian W. Davis,et al. The backrub motion: how protein backbone shrugs when a sidechain dances. , 2006, Structure.
[14] Colin A. Smith,et al. A simple model of backbone flexibility improves modeling of side-chain conformational variability. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.
[15] Zhiping Weng,et al. Protein–protein docking benchmark version 4.0 , 2010, Proteins.
[16] Ruth Nussinov,et al. HingeProt: Automated prediction of hinges in protein structures , 2008, Proteins.
[17] R Abagyan,et al. A new method for modeling large‐scale rearrangements of protein domains , 1997, Proteins.
[18] S. Wodak,et al. Assessment of blind predictions of protein–protein interactions: Current status of docking methods , 2003, Proteins.
[19] E. Katchalski‐Katzir,et al. Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[20] T. Bhat,et al. The Protein Data Bank and the challenge of structural genomics , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.
[21] Gil Amitai,et al. Network analysis of protein structures identifies functional residues. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.
[22] G J Barton,et al. Continuous and discontinuous domains: An algorithm for the automatic generation of reliable protein domain definitions , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[23] Zhiping Weng,et al. Docking unbound proteins using shape complementarity, desolvation, and electrostatics , 2002, Proteins.
[24] Zhiping Weng,et al. A protein–protein docking benchmark , 2003, Proteins.
[25] Haiyan Jiang,et al. Ab initio construction of all-atom loop conformations , 2006, Journal of molecular modeling.
[26] Sandor Vajda,et al. CAPRI: A Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions , 2003, Proteins.
[27] S. Wodak,et al. Assessment of CAPRI predictions in rounds 3–5 shows progress in docking procedures , 2005, Proteins.