Explorer Estimation of the Spontaneous Mutation Rate in Heliconius melpomene

We estimated the spontaneous mutation rate in Heliconius melpomene by genome sequencing of a pair of parents and 30 of their offspring, based on the ratio of number of de novo heterozygotes to the number of callable site-individuals. We detected nine new mutations, each one affecting a single site in a single offspring. This yields an estimated mutation rate of 2.9 10 9 (95% confidence interval, 1.3 10 –5.5 10 ), which is similar to recent estimates in Drosophila melanogaster, the only other insect species in which the mutation rate has been directly estimated. We infer that recent effective population size of H. melpomene is about 2 million, a substantially lower value than its census size, suggesting a role for natural selection reducing diversity. We estimate that H. melpomene diverged from its M€ ullerian comimic H. erato about 6 Ma, a somewhat later date than estimates based on a local molecular clock.

[1]  James Mallet,et al.  Multilocus Species Trees Show the Recent Adaptive Radiation of the Mimetic Heliconius Butterflies , 2014, bioRxiv.

[2]  D. Halligan,et al.  Estimation of the Spontaneous Mutation Rate per Nucleotide Site in a Drosophila melanogaster Full-Sib Family , 2013, Genetics.

[3]  Simon H. Martin,et al.  Genome-wide evidence for speciation with gene flow in Heliconius butterflies , 2013, Genome research.

[4]  Daniel R. Schrider,et al.  Rates and Genomic Consequences of Spontaneous Mutational Events in Drosophila melanogaster , 2013, Genetics.

[5]  Lilia M. Iakoucheva,et al.  Whole-Genome Sequencing in Autism Identifies Hot Spots for De Novo Germline Mutation , 2012, Cell.

[6]  N. Colegrave,et al.  Estimate of the Spontaneous Mutation Rate in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii , 2012, Genetics.

[7]  P. Andolfatto,et al.  Revisiting an Old Riddle: What Determines Genetic Diversity Levels within Species? , 2012, PLoS biology.

[8]  S. Steinberg,et al.  Rate of de novo mutations and the importance of father’s age to disease risk , 2012, Nature.

[9]  Helga Thorvaldsdóttir,et al.  Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration , 2012, Briefings Bioinform..

[10]  Simon H. Martin,et al.  Butterfly genome reveals promiscuous exchange of mimicry adaptations among species , 2012, Nature.

[11]  Heng Li,et al.  A statistical framework for SNP calling, mutation discovery, association mapping and population genetical parameter estimation from sequencing data , 2011, Bioinform..

[12]  M. DePristo,et al.  Variation in genome-wide mutation rates within and between human families , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[13]  M. DePristo,et al.  A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[14]  P. Shannon,et al.  Analysis of Genetic Inheritance in a Family Quartet by Whole-Genome Sequencing , 2010, Science.

[15]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Elements of Evolutionary Genetics , 2010 .

[16]  Marian Thomson,et al.  Analysis of the genome sequences of three Drosophila melanogaster spontaneous mutation accumulation lines. , 2009, Genome research.

[17]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Direct estimation of per nucleotide and genomic deleterious mutation rates in Drosophila , 2007, Nature.

[18]  L. Hurst,et al.  Hearing silence: non-neutral evolution at synonymous sites in mammals , 2006, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[19]  J. Gillespie IS THE POPULATION SIZE OF A SPECIES RELEVANT TO ITS EVOLUTION? , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[20]  J. Drake,et al.  Rates of spontaneous mutation. , 1998, Genetics.

[21]  J. Haigh,et al.  The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. , 1974, Genetical research.