Splenic Heterogeneity in Focused Assessment With Sonography for Trauma (FAST) Scan Led to the Diagnosis of Grade 2 Splenic Injury in a Pediatric Blunt Abdominal Trauma

Splenic injuries are one of the most common injuries following blunt abdominal trauma. It occurs in 32% of blunt abdominal trauma, with motor vehicle accidents being the most common cause. The patient may present with generalized abdominal pain or left upper quadrant pain associated with left shoulder pain. Hemodynamic instability is one of the most reliable signs of splenic injuries. A focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) scan is the initial imaging used to assess for solid organ injury in the abdomen, followed by computed tomography (CT) scans. Evidence of free fluid in the abdomen in the FAST scan indicates a solid organ injury. However, the absence of the before-mentioned finding does not rule out the presence of solid organ injury. Hereby a case of a 13-year-old Saudi male with left-sided abdominal pain after falling from a motorbike. A set of the investigation was done with insignificant results. However, FAST revealed a heterogenous appearance in the spleen. Thus, the patient subsequently underwent abdominal CT scans. The patient was managed conservatively and then discharged against medical advice (DAMA). Previously documented cases have mentioned the presence of free fluid in the abdomen in FAST scan in a stable patient leading to undergoing a CT scan and further managing trauma victim patients, which was absent in the present case.

[1]  Jennie Han,et al.  Splenic artery embolization improves outcomes and decreases the length of stay in hemodynamically stable blunt splenic injuries - A level 1 Australian Trauma centre experience. , 2021, Injury.

[2]  D. Zivanovic,et al.  Importance of a Follow-Up Ultrasound Protocol in Monitoring Posttraumatic Spleen Complications in Children Treated with a Non-Operative Management , 2021, Medicina.

[3]  R. Sinert,et al.  The Utility of the Focused Assessment With Sonography in Trauma Examination in Pediatric Blunt Abdominal Trauma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2019, Pediatric emergency care.

[4]  R. Mukherjee,et al.  Splenic trauma in the twenty‐first century: changing trends in management , 2018, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[5]  D. Candinas,et al.  Follow-Up Imaging in Patients with Blunt Splenic or Hepatic Injury Managed Nonoperatively , 2018, The American surgeon.

[6]  F. Atoof,et al.  Routine versus selective chest and abdominopelvic CT-scan in conscious blunt trauma patients: a randomized controlled study , 2018, European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery.

[7]  H. Al-Qadhi,et al.  The Incidence of Splenic Injury Following Blunt Abdominal Trauma (BAT), Sultan Qaboos University Hospital Experience , 2017 .

[8]  R. Peralta,et al.  Blunt splenic trauma: Assessment, management and outcomes. , 2016, The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland.

[9]  J. Haukoos,et al.  Emergency Department Ultrasound Is not a Sensitive Detector of Solid Organ Injury , 2009, The western journal of emergency medicine.

[10]  Mohammed S. Al-Qahtani The pattern and management outcomes of splenic injuries in the Assir region of Saudi Arabia. , 2004, West African journal of medicine.

[11]  F. Terrier,et al.  Blunt abdominal trauma: should US be used to detect both free fluid and organ injuries? , 2003, Radiology.

[12]  Jeffrey S. Young,et al.  Practice management guidelines for the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma: the East practice management guidelines work group. , 2002, The Journal of trauma.

[13]  N. Aikawa,et al.  Usefulness and limitations of ultrasonography in the initial evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma. , 1997, The Journal of trauma.

[14]  H. Rode Splenic Injury , 1990, Pediatrics In Review.