A Benchmarking Exercise on Latin American Water Util

The aim of this study is to estimate both stochastic and mathematical programming cost functions and frontier studies with the ADERASA’s database. ADERASA is a Latin American association of water regulators, which has done a systematic effort on data collection. Econometric and DEA techniques were employed here. This study fills a gap on the understanding of relative efficiency in the Latin American water sector., through a consistent database. Firstly we present a survey of the empirical literature related with cost and production frontiers in the water and sanitation sector. The survey shed light in order to determine the variables to choose in the models to be estimated. Secondly, some models were estimated, differing each other on the specification, and the environmental variables included. The results are satisfactory, with the expected signs and plausible values for the coefficients. Some consistency between methodologies was found.

[1]  Consistency Conditions: Efficiency Measures for the Electricity Distribution Sector in South America , 1999 .

[2]  Lućıa Quesada.  Network Competition and Network Regulation , 2001 .

[3]  Omar O. Chisari,et al.  On the Marginal Cost of Public Funds for Argentina: CGE Evaluation and Sensitivity to Regulatory Regimes , 2008 .

[4]  Antonio Estache,et al.  Sector Organization, Governance, and the Inefficiency of African Water Utilities , 2002 .

[5]  Omar O. Chisari,et al.  Trade Balance Effects of Infrastructure Services Liberalization and of Their Regulation , 2005 .

[6]  Scott Reid,et al.  Estimating OPEX productivity growth in English and Welsh water and sewerage companies:1992-2003 , 2004 .

[7]  Determinación de la eficiencia operativa en la regulación de monopolios naturales: el uso de información de consultores versus competencia por comparaciones , 2003 .

[8]  Gustavo Ferro,et al.  Are There Cost Differences in the Argentinean Pension Fund Industry? An Efficiency Frontier Analysis , 2008 .

[9]  Omar O. Chisari,et al.  High-tension electricity network expansions in Argentina: decision mechanisms and willingness-to-pay revelation , 2001 .

[10]  Gustavo Ferro,et al.  A Cost Frontier For Pension Funds in Argentina , 2006 .

[11]  Gustavo Ferro.  Options for Radical Reforms to Pension Systems: Chilean and Swedish Models Compared , 2005 .

[12]  Chen Lin,et al.  Consistency in performance rankings: the Peru water sector , 2008 .

[13]  Gustavo Ferro,et al.  Efficiency in Water and Sanitation Sector. A Survey on Empirical Literature , 2007 .

[14]  Chen Lin,et al.  Service quality and prospects for benchmarking: Evidence from the Peru water sector , 2005 .

[15]  Martín A. Rossi,et al.  Technical Change and Catching-up: The Electricity Distribution Sector in South America , 2000 .

[16]  Omar O. Chisari.  A Note on Access Pricing, Role Exchangeability and Incentives to Invest , 2007 .

[17]  David S. Saal,et al.  Determining the contribution of technical change, efficiency change and scale change to productivity growth in the privatized English and Welsh water and sewerage industry: 1985–2000 , 2007 .

[18]  Omar O. Chisari,et al.  Winners and Losers from Utility Privatization in Argentina: Lessons from a General Equilibrium Model , 1999 .

[19]  Gary D. Ferrier,et al.  Consistency Conditions for Regulatory Analysis of Financial Institutions : A Comparison of Frontier Efficiency Methods , 1997 .

[20]  A. Estache,et al.  Comparing the performance of public and private water companies in the Asia and Pacific region : what a stochastic costs frontier shows , 1999 .

[21]  David S. Saal,et al.  Productivity and Price Performance in the Privatized Water and Sewerage Companies of England and Wales , 2001 .

[22]  A. Bottasso,et al.  Cost Inefficiency in the English and Welsh Water Industry: An Heteroskedastic Stochastic Cost Frontier Approach , 2003 .

[23]  Efficiency Measures and Regulation: An Illustration of the Gas Distribution Sector in Argentina , 1999 .

[24]  Giovanni Fraquelli,et al.  Cost Efficiency and Scale Economies in the Italian Water Industry , 2005 .

[25]  Omar O. Chisari,et al.  Trade balance constraints and optimal regulation , 2005 .

[26]  Guillermo Sabbioni.  Econometric Measures of the Relative Efficiency of Water and Sewerage Utilities in Brazil , 2006 .

[27]  Marcelo Resende,et al.  Efficiency and regulatory issues in the Brazilian water and sewage sector: an empirical study , 2004 .

[28]  Estimación de una frontera de costos estocástica para empresas del sector agua en Asia y Región del Pacífico , 1999 .

[29]  Omar O. Chisari,et al.  The Cost of Capital in Regulated Firms: The Argentine Experience , 2000 .

[30]  Reducing the Asymmetry of Information Through the comparison of the Relative Efficiency of Several Regional Monopolies , 2001 .

[31]  Political Risk and Regulatory Risk: Issues in Emerging Markets Infrastructure Concessions , 2001 .

[32]  Paula Margaretic,et al.  The effectiveness of Antitrust Enforcement in Argentina, Chile and Perú during the 90´ , 2005 .

[33]  Antonio Estache,et al.  The potential role of economic cost models in the regulation of telecommunications in developing countries , 2002, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[34]  Measuring Inefficiency in Public Utilities: Does the Distribution Matter? , 2001 .

[35]  Scott Wallsten,et al.  Has Private Participation in Water and Sewerage Improved Coverage? Empirical Evidence from Latin America , 2004 .

[36]  Martín A. Rossi,et al.  Technical change and efficiency measures: the post-privatisation in the gas distribution sector in Argentina , 2001 .

[37]  Gustavo Ferro,et al.  On the regulatory choice of returns to scale in DEA MODELS: An Application to the argentine electricity distribution sector , 2007 .