Velocity measurement-based friction estimation for railway vehicles running on adhesion limit: swarm intelligence-based multiple models approach

Abstract Model-based condition monitoring is an increasingly important area for rail transportation. The key elements of such condition monitoring methodologies are low-cost vehicle sensors and intelligent algorithms. In this study, a swarm intelligence-based multiple models approach is proposed to detect different friction conditions by using velocity measurements of a railway vehicle. In this case of application, estimated parameter is the maximum friction coefficient. Additionally, proposed methodology is tested experimentally by using the measurements taken from a tram wheel test stand. Multiple mathematical models of the test stand are created with different maximum friction coefficients, whereas all initial conditions and other system parameters are same for each model. Therefore, comparison of the output of each model with measurements is considered to interpret the parameter value of the model, which best represents the system, is selected as parameter estimate. Unlike the traditional multiple models approach, a swarm intelligence-based evolution of the models is proposed. Experiments carried out on the test stand reveal that the proposed methodology is promising to be used as an on-board friction condition monitoring tool for railway vehicles with traction. Furthermore, it can be considered to detect weather conditions since friction conditions change due to the weather events such as rain, ice, snowfall, condensation of water droplets, and leaves on the line and it can be used as an auxiliary system for intelligent traction and high adhesion control systems.

[1]  Roger M. Goodall,et al.  Low Adhesion Estimation , 2006 .

[2]  Masafumi Hagiwara,et al.  Balancing Exploitation and Exploration in Particle Swarm Optimization: Velocity-based Reinitialization , 2008 .

[3]  Bhawani Shankar Chowdhry,et al.  Identification of Wheel-Rail Contact Condition Using Multi- Kalman Filtering Approach , 2012 .

[4]  Petr Voltr,et al.  Transient wheel–rail adhesion characteristics under the cleaning effect of sliding , 2015 .

[5]  J. Bokor,et al.  Observer based estimation of the wheel-rail friction coefficient , 2006, 2006 IEEE Conference on Computer Aided Control System Design, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control.

[6]  Petr Voltr,et al.  An unscented Kalman filter-based rolling radius estimation methodology for railway vehicles with traction , 2018 .

[7]  Jaroslav Novak,et al.  An adaptive sliding mode control to stabilize wheel slip and improve traction performance , 2018 .

[8]  W. J. Wang,et al.  Study on the adhesion behavior of wheel/rail under oil, water and sanding conditions , 2011 .

[9]  Steven E. Shladover,et al.  Connected and automated vehicle systems: Introduction and overview , 2018, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[10]  Maksym Spiryagin,et al.  Influence of AC system design on the realisation of tractive efforts by high adhesion locomotives , 2017 .

[11]  Roger M. Goodall,et al.  Use of real time creep force estimation data for assessment of low adhesion in the wheel/rail contact , 2011 .

[12]  Bo Liang,et al.  Re-adhesion control for a railway single wheelset test rig based on the behaviour of the traction motor , 2013 .

[13]  Hyoshin Park,et al.  Interpretation of Bayesian neural networks for predicting the duration of detected incidents , 2016, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[14]  O. Polách Creep forces in simulations of traction vehicles running on adhesion limit , 2005 .

[15]  Nicola Bosso,et al.  Strategies to simulate wheel–rail adhesion in degraded conditions using a roller-rig , 2015 .

[16]  A simple 3‐dimensional model to analyse wheel‐rail adhesion under wet condition , 2018 .

[17]  Qing He,et al.  A multi-objective optimization approach to the location of road weather information system in New York State , 2018, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[18]  Radovan Dolecek,et al.  Traction Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Torque Control with Flux Weakening , 2009 .

[19]  Qing Wu,et al.  Applications of particle swarm optimization in the railway domain , 2016 .

[20]  Daves What is Condition Monitoring , 1990 .

[21]  H. Hertz Ueber die Berührung fester elastischer Körper. , 1882 .

[22]  Lijun Diao,et al.  Taking Traction Control to Task: High-Adhesion-Point Tracking Based on a Disturbance Observer in Railway Vehicles , 2017, IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine.

[23]  Francesco Corman,et al.  Evaluating Disturbance Robustness of Railway Schedules , 2014, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[24]  Roger Lewis,et al.  Wheel-rail creep force model for predicting water induced low adhesion phenomena , 2017 .

[25]  Gunter Schupp,et al.  Modelling the Contact Between Wheel and Rail Within Multibody System Simulation , 2004 .

[26]  Ajith Abraham,et al.  Inertia Weight strategies in Particle Swarm Optimization , 2011, 2011 Third World Congress on Nature and Biologically Inspired Computing.

[27]  Farrukh Shahzad,et al.  Probabilistic opposition-based particle swarm optimization with velocity clamping , 2013, Knowledge and Information Systems.

[28]  Stefano Bruni,et al.  Analysis of Wheel-Roller Contact and Comparison with the Wheel-Rail Case , 2015 .

[29]  Imtiaz Hussain,et al.  Estimation of wheel–rail contact conditions and adhesion using the multiple model approach , 2013 .

[30]  Roger M. Goodall,et al.  Condition Monitoring Opportunities Using Vehicle-Based Sensors , 2011 .

[31]  Jing He,et al.  Online Estimation of the Adhesion Coefficient and Its Derivative Based on the Cascading SMC Observer , 2017, J. Sensors.

[32]  Roger M. Goodall,et al.  Real time detection of low adhesion in the wheel/rail contact , 2013 .

[33]  Bo Liang,et al.  Friction coefficient estimation using an unscented Kalman filter , 2014 .

[34]  Eleni I. Vlahogianni,et al.  Modeling the Effects of Weather and Traffic on the Risk of Secondary Incidents , 2012, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[35]  Petr Voltr Simulation of wheel-rail contact conditions on experimental equipment , 2015 .

[36]  Lina Kattan,et al.  A Probe-Based Variable Speed Limit System , 2015, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[37]  Christopher P. Ward,et al.  Leaves on the Line: Low Adhesion Detection in Railways , 2016 .

[38]  Zhi Chen,et al.  Modeling lane-change-related crashes with lane-specific real-time traffic and weather data , 2018, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[39]  Yongji Zhou,et al.  Real-Time Modeling of Wheel-Rail Contact Laws with System-On-Chip , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[40]  R. M. Goodall,et al.  Adhesion estimation at the wheel–rail interface using advanced model-based filtering , 2012 .

[41]  Maksym Spiryagin,et al.  An overview: modern techniques for railway vehicle on-board health monitoring systems , 2017 .

[42]  Petr Voltr,et al.  A new friction condition identification approach for wheel–rail interface , 2017 .

[43]  Maksym Spiryagin,et al.  Design and Simulation of Rail Vehicles , 2014 .

[44]  Paul A. Meehan,et al.  Dynamic response of a locomotive with AC electric drives to changes in friction conditions , 2017 .

[45]  Roger M. Goodall,et al.  Models for estimation of creep forces in the wheel/rail contact under varying adhesion levels , 2014 .