Improving Product Usage Monitoring and Analysis with Semantic Concepts

Nowadays, complex electronic products, such as DVD players or mobile phones, offer a huge number of functions. As a consequence of the complexity of the devices, customers often have problems to use such products effectively. For example, it has been observed that an increasing number of technically sound products is returned due to, e.g., interaction problems. One possible root cause of this problem is that most product development processes are still too technology-driven, i.e., potential users are brought into contact with the product only at a very late stage. If early consumer tests are carried out, then these typically aim at abstract market evaluations rather than formulating concrete requirements towards the functionality of the product. As a result, products often have little meaning or relevance to the customers. Therefore, we need better ways to involve users in the development of such products. This can be achieved by observing product usage in the field and incorporating the gained knowledge in the product creation process. This paper proposes an approach to build automatic observation modules into products, collect usage data, and analyze these data by means of process mining techniques exploiting a novel semantic link between observation and analysis. This link yields two main benefits: (i) it adds focus to the potential mass of captured data items; and (ii) it reduces the need for extensive post-processing of the collected data. Together with the framework’s flexibility to change observation modules remotely on-the-fly, these benefits speed up the information feedback cycle towards development.

[1]  Eyal Shifroni,et al.  Interactive user modeling: An integrative explicit-implicit approach , 1992, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[2]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Semantic Process Mining Tools: Core Building Blocks , 2008, ECIS.

[3]  Henk Corporaal,et al.  Semantic concepts in product usage monitoring and analysis , 2008 .

[4]  Henk Corporaal,et al.  UML Profile for modeling product observation , 2008, 2008 Forum on Specification, Verification and Design Languages.

[5]  Boudewijn F. van Dongen,et al.  ProM 4.0: Comprehensive Support for Real Process Analysis , 2007, ICATPN.

[6]  Matthias Jarke,et al.  Advances in Database Technology — EDBT 2002 , 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[7]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Fuzzy Mining - Adaptive Process Simplification Based on Multi-perspective Metrics , 2007, BPM.

[8]  John Domingue,et al.  An Outlook on Semantic Business Process Mining and Monitoring , 2007, OTM Workshops.

[9]  Lora Aroyo,et al.  The Semantic Web: Research and Applications , 2009, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[10]  Henk Corporaal,et al.  Specification for User Modeling with Self-Observing Systems , 2008, First International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interaction.

[11]  Jos de Bruijn,et al.  The Web Service Modeling Language WSML: An Overview , 2006, ESWC.

[12]  David F. Redmiles,et al.  An approach to large-scale collection of application usage data over the internet , 1998, Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Software Engineering.

[13]  Peter J. M. Sonnemans,et al.  Managing product reliability in business processes 'under pressure' , 2005, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[14]  Dieter Fensel,et al.  Semantic business process management: a vision towards using semantic Web services for business process management , 2005, IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering (ICEBE'05).

[15]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A translation approach to portable ontology specifications , 1993, Knowl. Acquis..

[16]  Fabio Casati,et al.  Semantic Analysis of Business Process Executions , 2002, EDBT.

[17]  Peter Spyns,et al.  Enhancing the Business Analysis Function with Semantics , 2006, OTM Conferences.

[18]  Guido Governatori,et al.  Compliance aware business process design , 2008 .

[19]  Jetty Kleijn,et al.  Petri Nets and Other Models of Concurrency - ICATPN 2007, 28th International Conference on Applications and Theory of Petri Nets and Other Models of Concurrency, ICATPN 2007, Siedlce, Poland, June 25-29, 2007, Proceedings , 2007, ICATPN.

[20]  Karin den Bouwmeester,et al.  Phases of use: a means to identify factors that influence product utilization , 2006, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[21]  H. Rex Hartson,et al.  Remote evaluation for post-deployment usability improvement , 1998, AVI '98.

[22]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  A Generic Import Framework for Process Event Logs , 2006, Business Process Management Workshops.

[23]  Zahir Tari,et al.  On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2006: CoopIS, DOA, GADA, and ODBASE, OTM Confederated International Conferences, CoopIS, DOA, GADA, and ODBASE 2006, Montpellier, France, October 29 - November 3, 2006. Proceedings, Part I , 2006, OTM Conferences.

[24]  Volodymyr Vasyutynskyy,et al.  Architecture and Data Model for Monitoring of Distributed Automation Systems , 2004 .

[25]  Boudewijn F. van Dongen,et al.  Business process mining: An industrial application , 2007, Inf. Syst..