Motor Strokes: The Lesion Location Determines Motor Excitability Changes

Background and Purpose— The purpose of this research was to investigate the impact of lesion location on motor excitability and motor performance. Methods— We studied patients with pure motor strokes in 4 different brain areas: motor cortex lesions (n=7), striatocapsular lesions (n=13), lacunar lesions of the internal capsule (n=13), and paramedian pontine lesions (n=10). Motor performance tests included the 9-hole-peg test and grip strength recordings. Motor excitability was determined by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Motor thresholds, stimulus-response curves, silent periods, motor cortical inhibition, and facilitation were investigated. Results— The 4 groups were clinically similar but showed major differences in motor excitability. Only motor cortex lesions had a loss of intracortical inhibition in the affected hemisphere. In the internal capsule lesion group and the pontine lesion group, stimulus-response curves were depressed on the affected side. All of the subcortical lesions showed a prolongation of the silent period in the paretic side. Motor thresholds were predominantly elevated in the lesioned hemisphere of patients with internal capsule or pontine lesions. Motor performance was correlated with silent period duration in internal capsule lesions and with motor thresholds in internal capsule and pontine lesions. Conclusions— Motor cortex lesions exhibited deficient inhibitory properties. In contrast, subcortical lesions displayed an enhancement of inhibition. Internal capsule and pontine lesions affecting the corticospinal tract on different levels particularly impaired neuronal recruitment. Our results suggest that the lesion location determines a specific pattern of motor excitability changes.

[1]  J. Liepert,et al.  Motor cortex disinhibition of the unaffected hemisphere after acute stroke , 2000, Muscle & nerve.

[2]  R. Mutani,et al.  Magnetic brain stimulation: the silent period after the motor evoked potential. , 1992, Neurology.

[3]  Gary W. Thickbroom,et al.  Motor outcome after subcortical stroke: MEPs correlate with hand strength but not dexterity , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[4]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Magnetic transcranial stimulation at intensities below active motor threshold activates intracortical inhibitory circuits , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  R. Benecke,et al.  Inhibitory actions of motor cortex following unilateral brain lesions as studied by magnetic brain stimulation , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  M. Ridding,et al.  Motor cortex excitability after thalamic infarction , 2005, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[7]  Jin-Hui Wang Short-term cerebral ischemia causes the dysfunction of interneurons and more excitation of pyramidal neurons in rats , 2003, Brain Research Bulletin.

[8]  A Münchau,et al.  Motor excitability in a patient with a somatosensory cortex lesion , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[9]  O. Witte,et al.  Extended brain disinhibition following small photothrombotic lesions in rat frontal cortex , 1997, Neuroreport.

[10]  P Noël,et al.  Magnetic transcranial stimulation in acute stroke: early excitation threshold and functional prognosis. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  J. Liepert,et al.  Motor cortex disinhibition in acute stroke , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[12]  P. Manganotti,et al.  Motor disinhibition in affected and unaffected hemisphere in the early period of recovery after stroke , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  P. Pasqualetti,et al.  Interhemispheric Asymmetries of Motor Cortex Excitability in the Postacute Stroke Stage: A Paired-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study , 2003, Stroke.

[14]  P. Rossini,et al.  Motor cortical disinhibition in the unaffected hemisphere after unilateral cortical stroke. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  Volker Hömberg,et al.  Remote changes in cortical excitability after stroke. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  D. Wade,et al.  Measuring arm impairment and disability after stroke. , 1989, International disability studies.

[17]  A. Oliviero,et al.  Motor cortex excitability changes within 8 hours after ischaemic stroke may predict the functional outcome. , 1999, European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine.

[18]  P. Schönle,et al.  Silent period measurement revives as a valuable diagnostic tool with transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  T Bäumer,et al.  Motor Cortex Excitability After Cerebellar Infarction , 2004, Stroke.

[20]  K. Zilles,et al.  Changes in GABAA and GABAB receptor binding following cortical photothrombosis: a quantitative receptor autoradiographic study , 1999, Neuroscience.

[21]  Paul Silberstein,et al.  Stimulation through electrodes implanted near the subthalamic nucleus activates projections to motor areas of cerebral cortex in patients with Parkinson's disease , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[22]  E Costanzo,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation after pure motor stroke , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[23]  B. Steinhoff,et al.  Effects of antiepileptic drugs on motor cortex excitability in humans: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 1996, Annals of neurology.

[24]  Robert Chen,et al.  Single pulse stimulation of the human subthalamic nucleus facilitates the motor cortex at short intervals. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  H. Tsuji,et al.  Intracortical facilitation and inhibition after transcranial magnetic stimulation in conscious humans. , 1997, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  C. Marsden,et al.  Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex. , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  A Schnitzler,et al.  The motor syndrome associated with exaggerated inhibition within the primary motor cortex of patients with hemiparetic. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[28]  T. Miles,et al.  Age and sex differences in human motor cortex input–output characteristics , 2003, The Journal of physiology.

[29]  M. Hallett,et al.  Spinal motor neuron excitability during the silent period after cortical stimulation. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[30]  M. Ridding,et al.  Stimulus/response curves as a method of measuring motor cortical excitability in man. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.