Rough contacts between actual engineering surfaces: Part I. Simple models for roughness description

Abstract The study of contact mechanics aspects is fundamental in many engineering problems. The first step in mechanical contact analysis is the surface description. Historically two different approaches have been developed: a statistical approach, based on a stochastic analysis, and a deterministic one involving the actual surfaces topography. In this paper a brief review of the most common models of roughness description is first proposed. The statistical approach gives poor results when for instance after running-in surfaces are considered; in these cases a deterministic approach is better. New simple models of roughness description in contact mechanics for actual engineering surfaces are proposed in this work. The real profile is described by parabolas that simulate it by maintaining the constancy of some specific characteristics. Once the parabolas are determined, important parameters for contact mechanics studies can be evaluated as the radii of curvature of the asperities. The methods developed are applied to five profiles extracted from engineering surfaces with different roughness conditions. Comparisons are made based on roughness parameters evaluated for the measured profiles and for the simulated ones. The approach with the parabolas obtained with the least square approximation based on two reference lines gives usually the best results, but the method that provides the best approximation of each specific roughness parameter depends on the kind of profile. The models developed will be then compared by testing the real roughness profiles with some contact mechanics models in a related paper.

[1]  J. Greenwood,et al.  The Contact of Two Nominally Flat Rough Surfaces , 1970 .

[2]  Yip-Wah Chung,et al.  The Contact Between Rough Surfaces With Longitudinal Texture—Part I: Average Contact Pressure and Real Contact Area , 1992 .

[3]  J. C. Chung,et al.  Fractal Model Developed for Elliptic Elastic-Plastic Asperity Microcontacts of Rough Surfaces , 2004 .

[4]  H. P. Lee,et al.  Contact mechanics of surfaces with various models of roughness descriptions , 2001 .

[5]  John I. McCool,et al.  Comparison of models for the contact of rough surfaces , 1986 .

[6]  Leon M Keer,et al.  Fast Methods for Solving Rough Contact Problems: A Comparative Study , 2000 .

[7]  I. Green,et al.  A Finite Element Study of Elasto-Plastic Hemispherical Contact Against a Rigid Flat , 2005 .

[8]  M. Ciavarella,et al.  A new 2D asperity model with interaction for studying the contact of multiscale rough random profiles , 2006 .

[9]  Stefan Björklund,et al.  A finite element-based model of normal contact between rough surfaces , 2003 .

[10]  P. Nayak,et al.  Random Process Model of Rough Surfaces , 1971 .

[11]  A. Polijaniuk,et al.  On the experimental verification of the Greenwood-Williamson model for the contact of rough surfaces , 1992 .

[12]  J. I. McCool,et al.  Predicting Microfracture in Ceramics Via a Microcontact Model , 1986 .

[13]  Herbert S. Cheng,et al.  The Contact Between Rough Surfaces With Longitudinal Texture—Part II: Flash Temperature , 1992 .

[14]  Yongwu Zhao,et al.  An Asperity Microcontact Model Incorporating the Transition From Elastic Deformation to Fully Plastic Flow , 2000 .

[15]  J. Greenwood,et al.  Contact of nominally flat surfaces , 1966, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[16]  Chih Lin,et al.  A Survey of Current Models for Simulating the Contact between Rough Surfaces , 1999 .

[17]  J. Greenwood A simplified elliptic model of rough surface contact , 2006 .

[18]  Itzhak Green,et al.  A statistical model of elasto-plastic asperity contact between rough surfaces , 2006 .

[19]  Jiunn-Jong Wu Simulation of rough surfaces with FFT , 2000 .

[20]  D. Bogy,et al.  An Elastic-Plastic Model for the Contact of Rough Surfaces , 1987 .

[21]  Andreas A. Polycarpou,et al.  Contact of rough surfaces with asymmetric distribution of asperity heights , 2002 .

[22]  Henry Peredur Evans,et al.  Conditions for Scuffing Failure of Ground and Superfinished Steel Disks at High Sliding Speeds Using a Gas Turbine Engine Oil , 1995 .

[23]  G. M. Bragallini,et al.  Investigation on Thermal Distress and Scuffing Failure Under Micro EHL Conditions , 2006 .

[24]  George G. Adams,et al.  Contact modeling — forces , 2000 .

[25]  E. Ciulli,et al.  Experiments on the Behaviour of Thrust Bearing Pivoted Pads , 2001 .

[26]  Jiunn-Jong Wu The Properties of Asperities of Real Surfaces , 2001 .

[27]  Liming Chang,et al.  A model of asperity interactions in elastic-plastic contact of rough surfaces , 2001 .

[28]  B. Bhushan,et al.  Fractal Model of Elastic-Plastic Contact Between Rough Surfaces , 1991 .

[29]  J. A. Greenwood,et al.  A simple theory of asperity contact in elastohydro-dynamic lubrication , 1972 .

[30]  Y. Jeng,et al.  An Elliptical Microcontact Model Considering Elastic, Elastoplastic, and Plastic Deformation , 2003 .

[31]  Klaus Knothe,et al.  Normal and tangential contact problem of surfaces with measured roughness , 2002 .

[32]  K. Komvopoulos,et al.  A Fractal Theory of the Interfacial Temperature Distribution in the Slow Sliding Regime: Part I—Elastic Contact and Heat Transfer Analysis , 1994 .

[33]  L. Kogut,et al.  Elastic-Plastic Contact Analysis of a Sphere and a Rigid Flat , 2002 .

[34]  Giovanni Teixeira,et al.  A simple numerical procedure to calculate the input data of Greenwood-Williamson model of asperity contact for actual engineering surfaces , 2003 .