Prophylactic Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) - The Importance of Nutritonal Support in Patients with Head and Neck Cancers (HNCs) or Neurogenic Dysphagia (ND).

BACKGROUND We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of prophylactic PEG performed for the enteral nutrition support during the oncological treatment of patients with HNCs and as a part of the management of neurological patients experiencing neurogenic dysphagia. METHODS In 2013 we followed up on a group of 23 HNC patients subjected to prophylactic PEG. We assessed the duration of the procedure, intraprocedural incidents and their causes, time to tube-refeeding and discharge after intervention, post interventional analgesia, early and late complications,toleration, costs and postoperative course of these patients after radical surgery maintaining PEG in place. In parallel we followed up on a group of 10 neurological patients who have undergone a PEG placement to improve the nutrional status and to prevent recurrent chest infections due to ND related silent aspiration. RESULTS The procedures were performed under sedation with Midazolam and the mean duration was about 7 minutes.Postoperative analgesia was minimal. Refeeding through the tube was initiated 2-4h hours later and the patients were discharged 12-24h after the procedure. Early complications were not observed and later we noted 2 cases of peristomal infections, succesfully managed conservatively. After oncologic surgery we noted 2 (8.69%) pharyngocutaneous fistulas.Conservative care obliterated the fistulas at 6 weeks, maintaining the feeding tube in place. We also compared the results with a group of 27 patients fed through the naso-gastric tube and a group of 20 cases with open gastrotomy-tube prophylactically inserted. The 10 neurological patients had varied conditions but degenerative diseases like motor neuron disease (3 cases" 30%) and multiple sclerosis (2 cases -20%) took the lead we encountered one case of peristomal infection and one case of tube blockage resolved by replacement. We evaluated the nutritional status by controling the weight of these patients before and after PEG placement. A mean weight gain of 3.1 kg(range 1.2 â€" 7) was documented. CONCLUSIONS PEG is a simple minimmaly invasive procedure performed safely under sedation. It takes a very short time and is virtually free of major complications. The requirements of analgesics are minimal. The refeeding is started early and the tube is well tolerated by the patient. PEG has an important role in the conservative healing of pharyngocutaneous fistula.PEG is the procedure of choice for the neurological patients.It prevents weight loss and aspiration pneumonia in patients with neurogenic dysphagia with a low rate of complications.

[1]  Ashley C. Mays,et al.  A model for predicting gastrostomy tube placement in patients undergoing surgery for upper aerodigestive tract lesions. , 2014, JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery.

[2]  E. Babin,et al.  Assessment of nutritional status and quality of life in patients treated for head and neck cancer. , 2014, European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases.

[3]  Lisa Martin,et al.  Malnutrition assessment in patients with cancers of the head and neck: a call to action and consensus. , 2013, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[4]  P. Burke,et al.  Nutritional considerations for head and neck cancer patients: a review of the literature. , 2013, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[5]  D. Cristian,et al.  The use of gastrostomy procedures in HNC patients. , 2013, Chirurgia.

[6]  Ruiwen Liu,et al.  Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic, laparoscopic and open gastrostomy insertion in children , 2013, Pediatric Surgery International.

[7]  T. Shoaib,et al.  Guideline for prophylactic feeding tube insertion in patients undergoing resection of head and neck cancers. , 2012, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[8]  D. Roth,et al.  Prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in treatment of head and neck cancer: a comprehensive review and call for evidence-based medicine. , 2011, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition.

[9]  V. Paleri,et al.  Use of gastrostomy in head and neck cancer: a systematic review to identify areas for future research , 2010, Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery.

[10]  V. Paleri,et al.  Prophylactic gastrostomy before chemoradiation in advanced head and neck cancer: a multiprofessional web-based survey to identify current practice and to analyse decision making. , 2010, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[11]  B. Murphy Advances in quality of life and symptom management for head and neck cancer patients , 2009, Current opinion in oncology.

[12]  D. Rischin,et al.  Randomized study of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus nasogastric tubes for enteral feeding in head and neck cancer patients treated with (chemo)radiation , 2008, Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology.

[13]  I. Cook Diagnostic evaluation of dysphagia , 2008, Nature Clinical Practice Gastroenterology &Hepatology.

[14]  H. P. Verschuur,et al.  Prophylactic gastrostomy placement and early tube feeding may limit loss of weight during chemoradiotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer, a preliminary study , 2007, Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery.

[15]  C. Fisher,et al.  Gastrostomy tube placement outcomes: comparison of surgical, endoscopic, and laparoscopic methods. , 2005, Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition.

[16]  P. Singer,et al.  ESPEN guidelines on artificial enteral nutrition--percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). , 2005, Clinical nutrition.

[17]  R. Martindale,et al.  ‘Push’ versus ‘pull’ percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in patients with advanced head and neck cancer , 2003, The Laryngoscope.

[18]  T. Mekhail,et al.  Enteral nutrition during the treatment of head and neck carcinoma , 2001, Cancer.

[19]  G. Snow,et al.  Assessment of malnutrition parameters in head and neck cancer and their relation to postoperative complications , 1997, Head & neck.

[20]  W. Rees,et al.  The use of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding tubes in patients with neurological disease , 1997, Journal of Neurology.

[21]  C. Wiles Neurogenic dysphagia. , 1991, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[22]  J. Bosset,et al.  [Evaluation of a predictive score for malnutrition in patients treated by irradiation for head and neck cancer: a retrospective study in 127 patients]. , 2013, Cancer radiotherapie : journal de la Societe francaise de radiotherapie oncologique.