The Information Assessment Method: Over 15 years of research evaluating the value of health information

[1]  Roland M. Grad,et al.  The value of user feedback: Healthcare professionals' comments to the health information provider , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[2]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care , 2003, The Lancet.

[3]  C. Urquhart,et al.  Reflections on the value and impact of library and information services: Part 2: impact assessment , 2016 .

[4]  S. Haynes,et al.  Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. , 1995 .

[5]  P. Pluye,et al.  Ecological content validation of the Information Assessment Method for parents (IAM-parent): A mixed methods study. , 2018, Evaluation and program planning.

[6]  Madian Khabsa,et al.  Digital commons , 2020, Internet Policy Rev..

[7]  José Veríssimo Romão Netto,et al.  Skill formation, cultural policies, and institutional hybridity: Bridging the gap between politics and policies at federal and state levels in Brazil , 2017 .

[8]  Lynda A. King,et al.  Focus groups in psychological assessment: enhancing content validity by consulting members of the target population. , 2004, Psychological assessment.

[9]  J. Creswell.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 3rd ed. , 2018 .

[10]  W. Chou,et al.  Is Online Health Activity Alive and Well or Flatlining? Findings From 10 Years of the Health Information National Trends Survey , 2015, Journal of health communication.

[11]  Donald Owen Case,et al.  What's the use? Measuring the frequency of studies of information outcomes , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  P. Pluye,et al.  A World of Possibilities in Mixed Methods: Review of the Combinations of Strategies Used to Integrate Qualitative and Quantitative Phases, Results and Data , 2018, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIPLE RESEARCH APPROACHES.

[13]  Christopher M. Shea,et al.  Criteria for selecting implementation science theories and frameworks: results from an international survey , 2017, Implementation Science.

[14]  Roland M. Grad,et al.  Health outcomes of online consumer health information: A systematic mixed studies review with framework synthesis , 2019, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[15]  M. Cabana,et al.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. , 1999, JAMA.

[16]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis? , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  Wura Jacobs,et al.  Health information seeking in the digital age: An analysis of health information seeking behavior among US adults , 2017 .

[18]  P. Pluye,et al.  A systematic mixed studies review on Organizational Participatory Research: towards operational guidance , 2018, BMC Health Services Research.

[19]  G. Gore,et al.  Decisional needs assessment of patients with complex care needs in primary care: a participatory systematic mixed studies review protocol , 2017, BMJ Open.

[20]  Antonio Gasparrini,et al.  Reducing and meta-analysing estimates from distributed lag non-linear models , 2013, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[21]  D. Sackett,et al.  Finding and applying evidence during clinical rounds: the "evidence cart". , 1998, JAMA.

[22]  M. Ebell,et al.  Top POEMs of 2016 Consistent with the Principles of the Choosing Wisely Campaign. , 2017, American family physician.

[23]  Paul B. Kantor,et al.  Studying the Value of Library and Information Services. Part I: Establishing a Theoretical Framework. , 1997 .

[24]  A. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research , 2007 .

[25]  Roland M. Grad,et al.  Overcoming the digital divide? Low education low income parents are equally likely to report benefits associated with online parenting information , 2017, ASIST.

[26]  Pierre Pluye,et al.  Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews. , 2014, Annual review of public health.

[27]  P. Pluye,et al.  Patient-Oriented Evidence that Matters (POEMs)™ Suggest Potential Clinical Topics for the Choosing Wisely™ Campaign , 2015, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[28]  Roland M. Grad,et al.  Four levels of outcomes of information-seeking: A mixed methods study in primary health care , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[29]  Roland M. Grad,et al.  Impact of clinical information-retrieval technology on physicians: A literature review of quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies , 2005, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[30]  Mark Ware,et al.  The STM report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing fourth edition , 2015 .

[31]  A. Booth,et al.  “Best fit” framework synthesis: refining the method , 2013, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[32]  L M Irwig,et al.  Evidence‐based medicine: useful tools for decision making , 2001, The Medical journal of Australia.

[33]  David Bawden,et al.  The dark side of information: overload, anxiety and other paradoxes and pathologies , 2009, J. Inf. Sci..