Due to environmental concerns regarding the use of mineral oil, biodegradable oil is increasingly being used as an alternative dielectric fluid. This paper presents results of experiments performed in the laboratory on the use of biodegradable oils for transformer application. The investigations cover two important diagnostic techniques for insulation assessment: (i) an investigation of partial discharge (PD) activity and characteristics in such oils and (ii) an investigation of the standard hydrocarbon dissolved gas products produced due to transformer faults. The fundamental aim of the investigation was to provide information as to whether the existing analysis techniques of PD fault pattern recognition and dissolved gas analysis methods, developed for mineral oil, are valid when used for insulation assessment with biodegradable transformer oil. The experiments were conducted on test samples to simulate three common types of transformer faults: low-energy PDs, high-energy arcing/sparking, and overheating. For the purpose of comparison, the same tests were performed using a mineral oil (Shell Diala MX) and a biodegradable oil (Envirotemp FR3). Also, each oil type was tested at three different moisture levels and with or without the presence of solid insulating materials (pressboard). PD activity was monitored using the standard IEC60270 phase-resolved analysis method. The fault gases produced were extracted and analysed by standard gas chromatography methods. Test results indicate that the PD phase resolved patterns are, in general, similar for the two oil types and thus existing PD pattern interpretations can be used to distinguish different types of PD faults, e.g. corona versus surface discharges. However, the values of various discharge quantities (PD magnitudes, repetition rate, current, etc) are very different under the same test condition. The quantities and the trend of dissolved gases for faults in biodegradable oil are substantially different compared with mineral oil. For the PD fault, biodegradable oil was found to release only a limited number of gases. For arcing and overheating faults, the main key gas produced is different between the two oils. Also, the presence of cellulosic materials such as pressboard influences the extent of hydrocarbon gases dissolved in the oil. It was found that for biodegradable oil, fewer amounts of gases are produced as the oil gets wetter.
[1]
I. Cotton,et al.
Dissolved gas analysis of alternative fluids for power transformers
,
2007,
IEEE Electrical Insulation Magazine.
[2]
T.R. Blackburn,et al.
Dissolved gas analysis (DGA) of arcing faults in biodegradable oil insulation systems
,
2008,
2008 International Symposium on Electrical Insulating Materials (ISEIM 2008).
[3]
C.P. McShane,et al.
Interaction mechanisms of natural ester dielectric fluid and Kraft paper
,
2005,
IEEE International Conference on Dielectric Liquids, 2005. ICDL 2005..
[4]
K. X. Lai,et al.
Comparison of partial discharge activity in mineral oil and bio-degradable oil
,
2007,
2007 Australasian Universities Power Engineering Conference.
[5]
T.R. Blackburn,et al.
Dissolved gas analysis of faults in biodegradable oil transformer insulating systems
,
2008,
2008 International Conference on Condition Monitoring and Diagnosis.
[6]
M. Duval,et al.
The duval triangle for load tap changers, non-mineral oils and low temperature faults in transformers
,
2008,
IEEE Electrical Insulation Magazine.
[7]
T. Oommen.
Vegetable oils for liquid-filled transformers
,
2002
.