Coordinating Global Virtual Teams: Building Theory from a Case Study of Software Development

Global Virtual Teams (GVTs) enable organizations to operate across national, economic and social, and cultural boundaries. However, this form of teamwork presents issues for traditional project management coordination mechanisms. There is a significant body of research on these challenges. However, relatively little attention has been paid to the specific impact these issues may have on coordination mechanisms in GVTs. This paper seeks to address this gap by applying a theoretical model drawn from extant research to explore the coordination mechanisms used by a software development GVT in a Fortune 100 telecommunications manufacturer. The study employs a mixed methodology grounded theory approach to examine the effect that specific virtual team issues have on the effectiveness of team coordination mechanisms. It then develops a refined conceptual model to guide future research on GVTs involved in software development. The findings also inform practice on the problems encountered in ensuring the effective coordination of such teams.

[1]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[2]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2000 .

[3]  Yvonne Dittrich,et al.  Software engineering across boundaries: student project in distributed collaboration , 1999 .

[4]  Kweku Ewusi-Mensah,et al.  Software Development Failures , 2003 .

[5]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[6]  Audris Mockus,et al.  Distance, dependencies, and delay in a global collaboration , 2000, CSCW '00.

[7]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[8]  Gary Klein,et al.  Reducing software requirement perception gaps through coordination mechanisms , 2009, J. Syst. Softw..

[9]  Paul A. Swatman,et al.  Structured-case: a methodological framework for building theory in information systems research , 2000, ECIS.

[10]  Suprateek Sarker,et al.  Implications of space and time for distributed work: an interpretive study of US–Norwegian systems development teams , 2004, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[11]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  Global Software Engineering: The Future of Socio-technical Coordination , 2007, Future of Software Engineering (FOSE '07).

[12]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[13]  J. Alberto Espinosa,et al.  Team Boundary Issues Across Multiple Global Firms , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Because Time Matters: Temporal Coordination in Global Virtual Project Teams , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Lucy Gilson,et al.  Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here? , 2004 .

[16]  James J. Jiang,et al.  Mediators between coordination and IS project performance , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[17]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  CONFLICT AND SHARED IDENTITY IN GEOGRAPHICALLY DISTRIBUTED TEAMS , 2001 .

[18]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[19]  Line Dubé,et al.  Global Virtual Teams , 2001, CACM.

[20]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999 .

[21]  Bradley C. Wheeler,et al.  NEBIC: A Dynamic Capabilities Theory for Assessing Net-Enablement , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[22]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Technology adaption: the case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team 1 , 2000 .

[23]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[24]  Siraman Ramachandran Effect of Cultural Norms on Media Choice in Global Virtual Teams , 2005, AMCIS.

[25]  K. Jehn A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in , 1997 .

[26]  Blake Ives,et al.  Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research , 2004, DATB.

[27]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Distance Matters , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[28]  C. Cramton The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration , 2001 .

[29]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Principles for effective virtual teamwork , 2009, CACM.

[30]  Pär J. Ågerfalk,et al.  Global software development , 2009, Commun. ACM.

[31]  D. Wilemon,et al.  Working Together Apart? Building a Knowledge-sharing Culture for Global Virtual Teams , 2004 .

[32]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  The evolution of coordination in outsourced software development projects: a comparison of client and vendor perspectives , 2003, Inf. Organ..

[33]  C. Saunders,et al.  My time or yours? Managing time visions in global virtual teams , 2004 .

[34]  Ilan Oshri,et al.  Social ties, knowledge sharing and successful collaboration in globally distributed system development projects , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  The Impact of Knowledge Coordination on Virtual Team Performance Over Time , 2007, MIS Q..

[36]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Coordination in software development , 1995, CACM.

[37]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An integrative model of organizational trust, Academy of Management Review, : . , 1995 .

[38]  J. Alberto Espinosa,et al.  Modeling Coordination Costs Due to Time Separation in Global Software Teams , 2003 .

[39]  Timothy R. Kayworth,et al.  The global virtual manager: a prescription for success , 2000 .

[40]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Task Coordination in Global Virtual Teams , 2004, ICIS.