Electrical field distribution within the injured cat spinal cord: injury potentials and field distribution.

This study investigated the spontaneous injury potentials measured after contusion or transection injury to the cat spinal cord. In addition, the distribution of electrical field potentials on the surface and within the spinal cord were measured following applied electrical fields after transection and contusion injuries. After transection of the spinal cord, the injury potentials were -19.8 +/- 2.6 mV; after contusion of the spinal cord, the injury potentials were -9.5 +/- 2.2 mV. These potentials returned to control values within 2.5-4h after injury. The electrical field distribution measured on the dorsal surface, as well as within the spinal cord, after the application of a 10 microA current, showed little difference between contusion and transection injuries. Scalar potential fields were measured using two configurations of stimulating electrodes: dorsal to dorsal (D-D), in which both electrodes were placed epidurally on the dorsal surface of the spinal cord, and ventral to dorsal (V-D), in which one electrode was placed dorsally and one ventrally. As reported in normal uninjured cats, the total current in the midsagittal plane for the D-D configuration was largely confined to the dorsal portion of the spinal cord; with the V-D configuration, the current distribution was uniform throughout the spinal cord. In the injured spinal cord, the equipotential lines midway between the stimulating electrodes have a wider separation than in the uninjured spinal cord. Because the magnitude of the electrical field E is equal to the current density J multiplied by the resistivity r, this suggests that either the current density is reduced or that the resistivity is reduced.

[1]  R B Borgens,et al.  Enhanced spinal cord regeneration in lamprey by applied electric fields. , 1981, Science.

[2]  J. Lafferty,et al.  233 - Comparison of the effects of minute levels of direct current and nerve growth factor on embryonic sensory ganglia in vitro , 1978 .

[3]  C. McCaig,et al.  The direction of growth of differentiating neurones and myoblasts from frog embryos in an applied electric field. , 1981, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  Experiments on the influence of electric current upon growing nerve cell processes in vitro. , 1947, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[5]  C. Bassett,et al.  Effect of weak, pulsing electromagnetic fields on neural regeneration in the rat. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  H. W. Beams,et al.  In vitro control of growing chick nerve fibers by applied electric currents. , 1946, Journal of cellular and comparative physiology.

[7]  A. Blight,et al.  Transected dorsal column axons within the guinea pig spinal cord regenerate in the presence of an applied electric field , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[8]  M. Poo,et al.  Orientation of neurite growth by extracellular electric fields , 1982, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[9]  C H Tator,et al.  Dose-response study of the pathological effects of chronically applied direct current stimulation on the normal rat spinal cord. , 1993, Journal of neurosurgery.

[10]  W. Young,et al.  Extracellular calcium ionic activity in experimental spinal cord contusion , 1982, Brain Research.

[11]  D H Wilson,et al.  Experimental regeneration in peripheral nerves and the spinal cord in laboratory animals exposed to a pulsed electromagnetic field , 1976, Paraplegia.

[12]  A. Lindsay,et al.  Effect of sympathectomy on extracellular potassium ionic activity and blood flow in experimental spinal cord contusion , 1982, Brain Research.

[13]  C. McCaig Spinal neurite reabsorption and regrowth in vitro depend on the polarity of an applied electric field. , 1987, Development.

[14]  B. Sisken,et al.  The effects of minute direct electrical currents on cultured chick embryo trigeminal ganglia. , 1975, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[15]  J. Myklebust,et al.  Electric field distribution within normal cat spinal cord. , 1994, Journal of neurotrauma.

[16]  K. R. Robinson,et al.  The distribution of free calcium in transected spinal axons and its modulation by applied electrical fields , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[17]  M. Fehlings,et al.  The effect of direct-current field on recovery from experimental spinal cord injury. , 1988, Journal of neurosurgery.

[18]  B. Albala,et al.  Mammalian optic nerve regeneration following the application of electric fields. , 1988, The Journal of trauma.

[19]  J. Freeman,et al.  Electrical stimulation of nerve regeneration in the rat: The early effects evaluated by a vibrating probe and electron microscopy , 1991, Neuroscience.

[20]  Arthur A. Pilla,et al.  PEMF, Direct Current and Nedronal Regeneration: Effect of Field Geometry and Current Density , 1984 .

[21]  J. W. Vanable,et al.  Bioelectricity and Regeneration , 1979 .

[22]  J. Cook,et al.  Effects of applied electric fields on clinical cases of complete paraplegia in dogs. , 1993, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[23]  L. Jaffe,et al.  Neurites grow faster towards the cathode than the anode in a steady field. , 1979, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[24]  M. Fehlings,et al.  Effect of a direct current field on axons after experimental spinal cord injury. , 1989, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[25]  R. Hurlbert,et al.  An in vivo technique for 3-dimensional field mapping in the rodent spinal cord , 1993, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[26]  R B Borgens,et al.  Large and persistent electrical currents enter the transected lamprey spinal cord. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  R. Nuccitelli,et al.  Electrical controls of development. , 1977, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering.

[28]  R. Borgens What is the role of naturally produced electric current in vertebrate regeneration and healing. , 1982, International review of cytology.

[29]  M. Cohen,et al.  Modification of retrograde degeneration in transected spinal axons of the lamprey by applied DC current , 1983, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[30]  Michael G. Fehlings,et al.  The effect of direct current field polarity on recovery after acute experimental spinal cord injury , 1992, Brain Research.

[31]  B. Albala,et al.  Facilitated regeneration in the rat peripheral nervous system using applied electric fields. , 1988, The Journal of trauma.

[32]  C. McCaig Nerve growth in a small applied electric field and the effects of pharmacological agents on rate and orientation. , 1990, Journal of cell science.

[33]  M. Poo,et al.  Perturbation of the direction of neurite growth by pulsed and focal electric fields , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[34]  A. Blight,et al.  Functional recovery after spinal cord hemisection in guinea pigs: The effects of applied electric fields , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.