Machines vs. Ensembles: Effective MAPK Signaling through Heterogeneous Sets of Protein Complexes

Despite the importance of intracellular signaling networks, there is currently no consensus regarding the fundamental nature of the protein complexes such networks employ. One prominent view involves stable signaling machines with well-defined quaternary structures. The combinatorial complexity of signaling networks has led to an opposing perspective, namely that signaling proceeds via heterogeneous pleiomorphic ensembles of transient complexes. Since many hypotheses regarding network function rely on how we conceptualize signaling complexes, resolving this issue is a central problem in systems biology. Unfortunately, direct experimental characterization of these complexes has proven technologically difficult, while combinatorial complexity has prevented traditional modeling methods from approaching this question. Here we employ rule-based modeling, a technique that overcomes these limitations, to construct a model of the yeast pheromone signaling network. We found that this model exhibits significant ensemble character while generating reliable responses that match experimental observations. To contrast the ensemble behavior, we constructed a model that employs hierarchical assembly pathways to produce scaffold-based signaling machines. We found that this machine model could not replicate the experimentally observed combinatorial inhibition that arises when the scaffold is overexpressed. This finding provides evidence against the hierarchical assembly of machines in the pheromone signaling network and suggests that machines and ensembles may serve distinct purposes in vivo. In some cases, e.g. core enzymatic activities like protein synthesis and degradation, machines assembled via hierarchical energy landscapes may provide functional stability for the cell. In other cases, such as signaling, ensembles may represent a form of weak linkage, facilitating variation and plasticity in network evolution. The capacity of ensembles to signal effectively will ultimately shape how we conceptualize the function, evolution and engineering of signaling networks.

[1]  A. Levitzki,et al.  Dimerization of Ste5, a mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade scaffold protein, is required for signal transduction. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  A. Varshavsky,et al.  Degradation of G alpha by the N-end rule pathway. , 1994, Science.

[3]  M. Moore,et al.  Ordered and Dynamic Assembly of Single Spliceosomes , 2011, Science.

[4]  David J. Klinke,et al.  An empirical Bayesian approach for model-based inference of cellular signaling networks , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.

[5]  Hiroaki Kitano,et al.  Biological robustness , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[6]  S. Dongen A cluster algorithm for graphs , 2000 .

[7]  J. Gunawardena,et al.  Unlimited multistability in multisite phosphorylation systems , 2009, Nature.

[8]  X. Zhuang,et al.  Breaking the Diffraction Barrier: Super-Resolution Imaging of Cells , 2010, Cell.

[9]  J. Gerhart,et al.  The theory of facilitated variation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  D. Gillespie Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[11]  Megan N. McClean,et al.  Cross-talk and decision making in MAP kinase pathways , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[12]  Huilin Li,et al.  Crystal Structure of the Caenorhabditis elegans Apoptosome Reveals an Octameric Assembly of CED-4 , 2010, Cell.

[13]  William K. Ridgeway,et al.  Quantitation of ten 30S ribosomal assembly intermediates using fluorescence triple correlation spectroscopy , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Henrik G. Dohlman,et al.  Persistent Activation by Constitutive Ste7 Promotes Kss1-Mediated Invasive Growth but Fails To Support Fus3-Dependent Mating in Yeast , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[15]  J. Thorner,et al.  Mutational analysis of STE5 in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: application of a differential interaction trap assay for examining protein-protein interactions. , 1997, Genetics.

[16]  H. Kitano,et al.  A quantitative characterization of the yeast heterotrimeric G protein cycle , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  M. Mann,et al.  Global, In Vivo, and Site-Specific Phosphorylation Dynamics in Signaling Networks , 2006, Cell.

[18]  C. Powell,et al.  Chitin scar breaks in aged Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2003, Microbiology.

[19]  Eugene Shakhnovich,et al.  Protein folding thermodynamics and dynamics: where physics, chemistry, and biology meet. , 2006, Chemical reviews.

[20]  Jehoshua Bruck,et al.  Scaffold proteins may biphasically affect the levels of mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling and reduce its threshold properties. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Theory of Protein Folding This Review Comes from a Themed Issue on Folding and Binding Edited Basic Concepts Perfect Funnel Landscapes and Common Features of Folding Mechanisms , 2022 .

[22]  V. Uversky Natively unfolded proteins: A point where biology waits for physics , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[23]  Matthew S. Creamer,et al.  Specification, annotation, visualization and simulation of a large rule-based model for ERBB receptor signaling , 2012, BMC Systems Biology.

[24]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Global analysis of protein expression in yeast , 2003, Nature.

[25]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  Protein topology determines binding mechanism. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Input–output behavior of ErbB signaling pathways as revealed by a mass action model trained against dynamic data , 2009, Molecular systems biology.

[27]  E. Elion,et al.  Differential input by Ste5 scaffold and Msg5 phosphatase route a MAPK cascade to multiple outcomes , 2004, The EMBO journal.

[28]  Andrew Emili,et al.  Identifying functional modules in the physical interactome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2007, Proteomics.

[29]  E. Elion,et al.  Nuclear Shuttling of Yeast Scaffold Ste5 Is Required for Its Recruitment to the Plasma Membrane and Activation of the Mating MAPK Cascade , 1999, Cell.

[30]  B. Alberts The Cell as a Collection of Protein Machines: Preparing the Next Generation of Molecular Biologists , 1998, Cell.

[31]  Michael Hucka,et al.  A Correction to the Review Titled "Rules for Modeling Signal-Transduction Systems" by W. S. Hlavacek et al. , 2006, Science's STKE.

[32]  James R Faeder,et al.  The complexity of complexes in signal transduction , 2003, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[33]  H. Noller,et al.  The ribosome in focus: new structures bring new insights. , 2007, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[34]  J. Williamson,et al.  Cooperativity in macromolecular assembly. , 2008, Nature chemical biology.

[35]  David W. Capson,et al.  Selection of partitions from a hierarchy , 1993, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[36]  R. Yu,et al.  Fus3 generates negative feedback that improves information transmission in yeast pheromone response , 2008, Nature.

[37]  M. Dembo,et al.  Theory of equilibrium binding of asymmetric bivalent haptens to cell surface antibody: application to histamine release from basophils. , 1978, Journal of immunology.

[38]  Leslie M Loew,et al.  Molecular machines or pleiomorphic ensembles: signaling complexes revisited , 2009, Journal of biology.

[39]  Wen Zheng,et al.  Dynamic studies of scaffold-dependent mating pathway in yeast. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[40]  James R Faeder,et al.  Efficient modeling, simulation and coarse-graining of biological complexity with NFsim , 2011, Nature Methods.

[41]  Leonor Saiz,et al.  Stochastic dynamics of macromolecular-assembly networks , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[42]  J. Lippincott-Schwartz,et al.  High-density mapping of single-molecule trajectories with photoactivated localization microscopy , 2008, Nature Methods.

[43]  Joseph D. Schrag,et al.  Interaction of a G-protein β-subunit with a conserved sequence in Ste20/PAK family protein kinases , 1998, Nature.

[44]  Caleb J Bashor,et al.  The Ste5 Scaffold Allosterically Modulates Signaling Output of the Yeast Mating Pathway , 2006, Science.

[45]  Eric J. Deeds,et al.  Optimizing ring assembly reveals the strength of weak interactions , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[47]  Vincent Danos,et al.  Scalable Simulation of Cellular Signaling Networks , 2007, APLAS.

[48]  Xiaohui Xie,et al.  Parameter inference for discretely observed stochastic kinetic models using stochastic gradient descent , 2010, BMC Systems Biology.

[49]  Vincent Danos,et al.  Abstract Interpretation of Cellular Signalling Networks , 2008, VMCAI.

[50]  Joan Weiner,et al.  Modularity of MAP kinases allows deformation of their signalling pathways , 2009, Nature Cell Biology.

[51]  Cosimo Laneve,et al.  Formal molecular biology , 2004, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[52]  Anand R Asthagiri,et al.  Quantitative effect of scaffold abundance on signal propagation , 2009, Molecular systems biology.

[53]  S. Dongen Graph clustering by flow simulation , 2000 .

[54]  P. Bork,et al.  Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery , 2006, Nature.

[55]  Vincent Danos,et al.  Combinatorial Complexity and Compositional Drift in Protein Interaction Networks , 2012, PloS one.

[56]  A. Bashan,et al.  Correlating ribosome function with high-resolution structures. , 2008, Trends in microbiology.

[57]  T. Hughes,et al.  Signaling and circuitry of multiple MAPK pathways revealed by a matrix of global gene expression profiles. , 2000, Science.

[58]  J. Lippincott-Schwartz,et al.  Imaging Intracellular Fluorescent Proteins at Nanometer Resolution , 2006, Science.

[59]  J. Thorner,et al.  Function and regulation in MAPK signaling pathways: lessons learned from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2007, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[60]  Vincent Danos,et al.  Internal coarse-graining of molecular systems , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[61]  Drew Endy,et al.  Scaffold number in yeast signaling system sets tradeoff between system output and dynamic range , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[62]  Wendell A. Lim,et al.  Rapid Diversification of Cell Signaling Phenotypes by Modular Domain Recombination , 2010, Science.

[63]  Vincent Danos,et al.  Rule-Based Modelling of Cellular Signalling , 2007, CONCUR.

[64]  M. Dembo,et al.  Theory of equilibrium binding of symmetric bivalent haptens to cell surface antibody: application to histamine release from basophils. , 1978, Journal of immunology.

[65]  Vincent Danos,et al.  Rule-Based Modelling, Symmetries, Refinements , 2008, FMSB.

[66]  Wendell A. Lim,et al.  Scaffold Proteins: Hubs for Controlling the Flow of Cellular Information , 2011, Science.

[67]  Christina Kiel,et al.  Challenges ahead in signal transduction: MAPK as an example. , 2012, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[68]  W. S. Hlavacek,et al.  A network model of early events in epidermal growth factor receptor signaling that accounts for combinatorial complexity. , 2006, Bio Systems.

[69]  Franco J. Vizeacoumar,et al.  Interaction landscape of membrane-protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2012, Nature.

[70]  T. Kortemme,et al.  Complex topology rather than complex membership is a determinant of protein dosage sensitivity , 2009, Molecular Systems Biology.

[71]  D. Bray,et al.  Computer-based analysis of the binding steps in protein complex formation. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[72]  Mustapha Samrakandi,et al.  Dual-color click beetle luciferase heteroprotein fragment complementation assays. , 2010, Chemistry & biology.

[73]  Michael J Rust,et al.  Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM) , 2006, Nature Methods.

[74]  Prospero C. Naval,et al.  Parameter estimation using Simulated Annealing for S-system models of biochemical networks , 2007, Bioinform..

[75]  R. Dohmen,et al.  Catalytic mechanism and assembly of the proteasome. , 2009, Chemical reviews.

[76]  M L Blinov,et al.  Combinatorial complexity and dynamical restriction of network flows in signal transduction. , 2004, Systems biology.