The effect of frequency and phonological neighbourhood density on the acquisition of past tense verbs by Finnish children
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Dorit Ravid,et al. Early noun plurals in German: regularity, productivity or default? , 2006, Journal of Child Language.
[2] Holly L. Storkel,et al. Do children acquire dense neighborhoods? An investigation of similarity neighborhoods in lexical acquisition , 2004, Applied Psycholinguistics.
[3] K. Koskenniemi,et al. A PROCESS MODEL OF MORPHOLOGY AND LEXICON , 1985 .
[4] S Pinker,et al. Rules of language. , 1991, Science.
[5] Wolfgang U. Dressler,et al. Core morphology in child directed speech: Crosslinguistic corpus analyses of noun plurals , 2008 .
[6] S. Pinker,et al. On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition , 1988, Cognition.
[7] Walter Schneider,et al. STEP—A System for Teaching Experimental Psychology using E-Prime , 2001, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[8] B. Hayes,et al. Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: a computational/experimental study , 2003, Cognition.
[9] Joan L. Bybee,et al. Regular morphology and the lexicon. , 1995 .
[10] E. Kidd,et al. Sex differences in past tense overregularization. , 2008, Developmental science.
[11] Joshua K. Hartshorne,et al. Why girls say 'holded' more than boys. , 2006, Developmental science.
[12] M. Ullman. Acceptability Ratings of Regular and Irregular Past-tense Forms: Evidence for a Dual-system Model of Language from Word Frequency and Phonological Neighbourhood Effects , 1999 .
[13] H. Clahsen,et al. Speeded production of inflected words in children and adults , 2004, Journal of Child Language.
[14] S Pinker,et al. Weird past tense forms , 1995, Journal of Child Language.
[15] David Eddington,et al. Spanish verbal inflection: a single- or dual-route system? , 2009 .
[16] M T Ullman,et al. The Declarative/Procedural Model of Lexicon and Grammar , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[17] James L. McClelland,et al. On learning the past-tenses of English verbs: implicit rules or parallel distributed processing , 1986 .
[18] Joan L. Bybee,et al. From Usage to Grammar: The Mind's Response to Repetition , 2007 .
[19] E. Dąbrowska. The effects of frequency and neighbourhood density on adult speakers’ productivity with Polish case inflections: an empirical test of usage-based approaches to morphology , 2008 .
[20] Steven Pinker,et al. Regular and Irregular Morphology and the Psychological Status of Rules of Grammar , 1991 .
[21] J. Berko. The Child's Learning of English Morphology , 1958 .
[22] E. Dąbrowska,et al. Learning a morphological system without a default: the Polish genitive , 2001, Journal of Child Language.
[23] Pienie Zwitserlood,et al. Stem access in regular and irregular inflection : Evidence from German participles , 2007 .
[24] K Plunkett,et al. The acquisition of past tense morphology in Icelandic and Norwegian children: an experimental study , 1999, Journal of Child Language.
[25] Joan L. Bybee,et al. Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense , 1982 .
[26] R. Baayen,et al. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .
[27] Steven Pinker,et al. Words and rules , 1998 .
[28] V. Marchman. Children's productivity in the English past tense: The role of frequency, phonology, and neighborhoo , 1997 .
[29] Jean E. Newman,et al. Are stem changes as natural as affixes? , 1995 .
[30] Gary F. Marcus,et al. German Inflection: The Exception That Proves the Rule , 1995, Cognitive Psychology.
[31] M. Ullman. Contributions of memory circuits to language: the declarative/procedural model , 2004, Cognition.
[32] S. Pinker,et al. The past and future of the past tense , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[33] Kim Plunkett,et al. A Connectionist Model of the Arabic Plural System , 1997 .
[34] J. Niemi,et al. Acquisition of Inflectional Marking: A Case Study of Finnish , 1987, Nordic Journal of Linguistics.
[35] D. Slobin. Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar , 1973 .
[36] E. Bates,et al. Continuity in lexical and morphological development: a test of the critical mass hypothesis , 1994, Journal of Child Language.
[37] Ewa Dąbrowska,et al. Rules or schemas? Evidence from Polish , 2004 .
[38] S Pinker,et al. Overregularization in language acquisition. , 1992, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.
[39] V. Marchman,et al. From rote learning to system building: acquiring verb morphology in children and connectionist nets , 1993, Cognition.
[40] Wolfgang U. Dressler,et al. On the predictiveness of Natural Morphology , 1985, Journal of Linguistics.
[41] Ewa Dabrowska,et al. The later development of an early-emerging system: the curious case of the Polish genitive , 2008 .