Fast group sparse classification

A recent work proposed a novel Group Sparse Classifier (GSC) that was based on the assumption that the training samples of a particular class approximately form a linear basis for any test sample belonging to that class. The Group Sparse Classifier requires solving an NP hard group-sparsity promoting optimization problem. Thus a convex relaxation of the optimization problem was proposed. The convex optimization problem, however, needs to be solved by quadratic programming and hence requires a large amount of computational time. To overcome this, we propose novel greedy (sub-optimal) algorithms for directly addressing the NP hard minimization problem. We call the classifiers based on these greedy group sparsity promoting algorithms as Fast Group Sparse Classifiers (FGSC). This work shows that the FGSC has nearly the same accuracy (at 95% confidence level) as the GSC, but with much faster computational speed (nearly two orders of magnitude). When certain conditions hold the GSC and the FGSC are robust to dimensionality reduction via random projection. By robust, we mean that the classification accuracy is approximately the same before and after random projection. The robustness of these classifi ers will be theoretically proved, and will be validated by thorough experimentation.

[1]  Y. C. Pati,et al.  Orthogonal matching pursuit: recursive function approximation with applications to wavelet decomposition , 1993, Proceedings of 27th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[2]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries , 1993, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[3]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[4]  Samuel Kaski,et al.  Dimensionality reduction by random mapping: fast similarity computation for clustering , 1998, 1998 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks Proceedings. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence (Cat. No.98CH36227).

[5]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  Atomic Decomposition by Basis Pursuit , 1998, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[6]  Xiaoguang Yang Scheduling with generalized batch delivery dates and earliness penalties , 2000 .

[7]  Sanjoy Dasgupta,et al.  Experiments with Random Projection , 2000, UAI.

[8]  Dimitris Achlioptas,et al.  Database-friendly random projections , 2001, PODS.

[9]  Avner Magen,et al.  Dimensionality Reductions That Preserve Volumes and Distance to Affine Spaces, and Their Algorithmic Applications , 2002, RANDOM.

[10]  Dmitriy Fradkin,et al.  Experiments with random projections for machine learning , 2003, KDD '03.

[11]  Carla E. Brodley,et al.  Random Projection for High Dimensional Data Clustering: A Cluster Ensemble Approach , 2003, ICML.

[12]  George Bebis,et al.  Face recognition experiments with random projection , 2005, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[13]  David W. Lin,et al.  A Group Matching Pursuit Algorithm for Sparse Channel Estimation for OFDM Transmission , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing Proceedings.

[14]  D. Donoho For most large underdetermined systems of linear equations the minimal 𝓁1‐norm solution is also the sparsest solution , 2006 .

[15]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Near-Optimal Signal Recovery From Random Projections: Universal Encoding Strategies? , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[16]  David L. Donoho,et al.  Sparse Solution Of Underdetermined Linear Equations By Stagewise Orthogonal Matching Pursuit , 2006 .

[17]  M. Yuan,et al.  Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables , 2006 .

[18]  Allen Y. Yang,et al.  Feature Selection in Face Recognition: A Sparse Representation Perspective , 2007 .

[19]  T. Blumensath,et al.  On the Difference Between Orthogonal Matching Pursuit and Orthogonal Least Squares , 2007 .

[20]  Mark W. Schmidt,et al.  GROUP SPARSITY VIA LINEAR-TIME PROJECTION , 2008 .

[21]  M. Fornasier,et al.  Iterative thresholding algorithms , 2008 .

[22]  Mike E. Davies,et al.  Gradient Pursuits , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[23]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Robust Recovery of Signals From a Union of Subspaces , 2008, ArXiv.

[24]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Robust Recovery of Signals From a Structured Union of Subspaces , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[25]  Deanna Needell,et al.  Uniform Uncertainty Principle and Signal Recovery via Regularized Orthogonal Matching Pursuit , 2007, Found. Comput. Math..

[26]  Rabab Kreidieh Ward,et al.  Classification via group sparsity promoting regularization , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.