Assessment of frame-averaging algorithms in OCT image analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE To evaluate frame registration and averaging algorithms for optical coherence tomography. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty normal and 20 glaucomatous eyes were imaged. Objective differences were measured by comparing noise variance, spread of edge, and contrast-to-noise ratio. Subjective image quality was also evaluated. RESULTS Two frame-averaging algorithms (FA400 and FA407) had better noise variance and contrast-to-noise ratio but worse spread of edge than did single frames (P < .01). Both algorithms provided better subjective assessments of structure boundaries than did single images (P < .001). FA407 had significantly lower spread of edge and better internal limiting membrane visualization than FA400. CONCLUSION Frame averaging significantly suppressed speckle noise and increased the visibility of retinal structures, but imperfect image registration caused edge blurring that could be detected by the spread of edge parameter. In frame-averaging algorithms, higher contrast-to-noise ratio and lower noise variance indicated better noise suppression, but spread of edge was most sensitive in comparing edge preservation between algorithms.

[1]  G. Wollstein,et al.  Detection of macular ganglion cell loss in glaucoma by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[2]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  SNR and noise measurements for medical imaging: I. A practical approach based on statistical decision theory. , 1993, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Masanori Hangai,et al.  Ultrahigh-resolution versus speckle noise-reduction in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. , 2009, Optics express.

[4]  Adrian S. Lewis,et al.  Image compression using the 2-D wavelet transform , 1992, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[5]  Zvi Friedman,et al.  The combined effect of spatial compounding and nonlinear filtering on the speckle reduction in ultrasound images. , 2006, Ultrasonics.

[6]  John Immerkær,et al.  Fast Noise Variance Estimation , 1996, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[7]  Firooz A. Sadjadi.  Perspective on techniques for enhancing speckled imagery , 1990 .

[8]  Dirk J. Faber,et al.  Recent developments in optical coherence tomography for imaging the retina , 2007, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[9]  Daniel F Kiernan,et al.  Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: a comparison of modern high-resolution retinal imaging systems. , 2010, American journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  Maarten A Hogervorst,et al.  Visualizing the Limits of Low Vision in Detecting Natural Image Features , 2008, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[11]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  Optical Coherence Tomography , 1991 .

[12]  S.W. Smith,et al.  Speckle Pattern Correlation with Lateral Aperture Translation: Experimental Results and Implications for Spatial Compounding , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[13]  David Alonso-Caneiro,et al.  Speckle reduction in optical coherence tomography imaging by affine-motion image registration. , 2011, Journal of biomedical optics.

[14]  Jean-Bernard Martens,et al.  An objective measure for perceived noise , 1996, Signal Process..

[15]  Mauro Barni,et al.  Improved wavelet-based watermarking through pixel-wise masking , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[16]  Markus Barth,et al.  Contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) as a quality parameter in fMRI , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  Stefan Winkler,et al.  Perceptual blur and ringing metrics: application to JPEG2000 , 2004, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[18]  K. J. Ray Liu,et al.  Fractal modeling and segmentation for the enhancement of microcalcifications in digital mammograms , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  C. Burckhardt.  Speckle in ultrasound B-mode scans , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[20]  Vasudevan Lakshminarayanan,et al.  Perception of High-Contrast Blurred Edges , 2001, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[21]  Mark E. Brezinski,et al.  Evaluation of the adaptive speckle suppression filter for coronary optical coherence tomography imaging , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  Zvi Friedman,et al.  A new method of spatial compounding imaging. , 2003, Ultrasonics.