Parsing a Perceptual Decision into a Sequence of Moments of Thought

Theoretical, computational, and experimental studies have converged to a model of decision-making in which sensory evidence is stochastically integrated to a threshold, implementing a shift from an analog to a discrete form of computation. Understanding how this process can be chained and sequenced – as virtually all real-life tasks involve a sequence of decisions – remains an open question in neuroscience. We reasoned that incorporating a virtual continuum of possible behavioral outcomes in a simple decision task – a fundamental ingredient of real-life decision-making – should result in a progressive sequential approximation to the correct response. We used real-time tracking of motor action in a decision task, as a measure of cognitive states reflecting an internal decision process. We found that response trajectories were spontaneously segmented into a discrete sequence of explorations separated by brief stops (about 200 ms) – which remained unconscious to the participants. The characteristics of these stops were indicative of a decision process – a “moment of thought”: their duration correlated with the difficulty of the decision and with the efficiency of the subsequent exploration. Our findings suggest that simple navigation in an abstract space involves a discrete sequence of explorations and stops and, moreover, that these stops reveal a fingerprint of moments of thought.

[1]  T. Flash,et al.  Minimum-jerk, two-thirds power law, and isochrony: converging approaches to movement planning. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  Paolo Viviani,et al.  Do Units of Motor Action Really Exist , 1986 .

[3]  Harold Pashler,et al.  Effects of practice on task architecture: Combined evidence from interference experiments and random-walk models of decision making , 2011, Cognition.

[4]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[5]  Alexander A. Fingelkurts,et al.  MAPPING OF BRAIN OPERATIONAL ARCHITECTONICS , 2006 .

[6]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Brain States: Top-Down Influences in Sensory Processing , 2007, Neuron.

[7]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[8]  Allen Newell,et al.  The model human processor: An engineering model of human performance. , 1986 .

[9]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Frédéric Gosselin,et al.  Information processing algorithms in the brain , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  F. Attneave Some informational aspects of visual perception. , 1954, Psychological review.

[12]  Daniel C. Richardson,et al.  The movement of eye and hand as a window into language and cognition , 2009 .

[13]  T. Shallice Specific impairments of planning. , 1982, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[14]  Wayne A. Wickelgren,et al.  Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics , 1977 .

[15]  H. Seal Studies in the history of probability and statistics , 1977 .

[16]  R Ratcliff,et al.  Continuous versus discrete information processing modeling accumulation of partial information. , 1988, Psychological review.

[17]  Steven W. Keele,et al.  Movement control in skilled motor performance. , 1968 .

[18]  Satoru Miyauchi,et al.  Discrete stochastic process underlying perceptual rivalry , 2003, Neuroreport.

[19]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Target selection in visual search as revealed by movement trajectories , 2008, Vision Research.

[20]  K. Lashley The problem of serial order in behavior , 1951 .

[21]  L. A. Jeffress,et al.  Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior , 1953 .

[22]  M. Shadlen,et al.  The effect of stimulus strength on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[23]  S. Ullman Visual routines , 1984, Cognition.

[24]  Jacob Feldman,et al.  Detection of change in shape: an advantage for concavities , 2003, Cognition.

[25]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  A shape-contrast effect for briefly presented stimuli. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  M. Sigman,et al.  Parsing a Cognitive Task: A Characterization of the Mind's Bottleneck , 2005, PLoS biology.

[27]  Indrayana Rustandi,et al.  Modeling fMRI data generated by overlapping cognitive processes with unknown onsets using Hidden Process Models , 2009, NeuroImage.

[28]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[29]  Junji Ito,et al.  Dynamics of spontaneous transitions between global brain states , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[30]  M. Sigman,et al.  Brain Mechanisms of Serial and Parallel Processing during Dual-Task Performance , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  Christoph M. Michel,et al.  Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Human Cognition. , 1999, News in physiological sciences : an international journal of physiology produced jointly by the International Union of Physiological Sciences and the American Physiological Society.

[32]  S Dehaene,et al.  A hierarchical neuronal network for planning behavior. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  C. Lebiere,et al.  The Atomic Components of Thought , 1998 .

[34]  M. Sigman,et al.  The human Turing machine: a neural framework for mental programs , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[35]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision Tasks , 2008, Neural Computation.

[36]  A. M. Turing,et al.  Studies in the History of Probability and Statistics. XXXVII A. M. Turing's statistical work in World War II , 1979 .

[37]  Jacob Feldman,et al.  Visual comparisons within and between object parts: evidence for a single-part superiority effect , 2003, Vision Research.

[38]  Jean,et al.  The Computer and the Brain , 1989, Annals of the History of Computing.

[39]  D. Vickers,et al.  Evidence for an accumulator model of psychophysical discrimination. , 1970, Ergonomics.

[40]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. , 2001, Psychological review.

[41]  P. Viviani,et al.  Trajectory determines movement dynamics , 1982, Neuroscience.

[42]  Philip Holmes,et al.  Optimal Decisions: From Neural Spikes, through Stochastic Differential Equations, to Behavior , 2005, IEICE Trans. Fundam. Electron. Commun. Comput. Sci..

[43]  Allen Newell,et al.  The psychology of human-computer interaction , 1983 .

[44]  Pascal Mamassian,et al.  Temporal dynamics in bistable perception. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[45]  P Viviani,et al.  Segmentation and coupling in complex movements. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[46]  A. Graybiel,et al.  Representation of Action Sequence Boundaries by Macaque Prefrontal Cortical Neurons , 2003, Science.

[47]  J. Feldman,et al.  Information along contours and object boundaries. , 2005, Psychological review.

[48]  W. Newsome,et al.  Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[49]  Ramón Huerta,et al.  Transient Cognitive Dynamics, Metastability, and Decision Making , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[50]  H Pashler,et al.  Processing stages in overlapping tasks: evidence for a central bottleneck. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[51]  R. G. J. Meulenbroek,et al.  Adaptation of a reaching model to handwriting: How different effectors can produce the same written output, and other results , 1996, Psychological research.

[52]  Go Tani,et al.  Modularity and hierarchical organization of action programs in human acquisition of graphic skills , 2002, Neuroscience Letters.

[53]  Jon Driver,et al.  Edge-Assignment and Figure–Ground Segmentation in Short-Term Visual Matching , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[54]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.