Signal discrimination by differential regulation of protein stability in quorum sensing.

Quorum sensing (QS) is a communication mechanism exploited by a large variety of bacteria to coordinate gene expression at the population level. In Gram-negative bacteria, QS occurs via synthesis and detection of small chemical signals, most of which belong to the acyl-homoserine lactone class. In such a system, binding of an acyl-homoserine lactone signal to its cognate transcriptional regulator (R-protein) often induces stabilization and subsequent dimerization of the R-protein, which results in the regulation of downstream gene expression. Existence of diverse QS systems within and among species of bacteria indicates that each bacterium needs to distinguish among a myriad of structurally similar chemical signals. We show, using a mathematical model, that fast degradation of an R-protein monomer can facilitate discrimination of signals that differentially stabilize it. Furthermore, our results suggest an inverse correlation between the stability of an R-protein and the achievable limits of fidelity in signal discrimination. In particular, an unstable R-protein tends to be more specific to its cognate signal, whereas a stable R-protein tends to be more promiscuous. These predictions are consistent with experimental data on well-studied natural and engineered R-proteins and thus have implications for understanding the functional design of QS systems.

[1]  E. Greenberg,et al.  The C-terminal region of the Vibrio fischeri LuxR protein contains an inducer-independent lux gene activating domain. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  S. C. Winans,et al.  The quorum-sensing transcriptional regulator TraR requires its cognate signaling ligand for protein folding, protease resistance, and dimerization. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  J. Sturgis,et al.  Dimerization of the quorum sensing regulator RhlR: development of a method using EGFP fluorescence anisotropy , 2003, Molecular microbiology.

[4]  S. D. De Keersmaecker,et al.  Synthesis of N-Acyl Homoserine Lactone Analogues Reveals Strong Activators of SdiA, the Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium LuxR Homologue , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[5]  Hao Song,et al.  Evolving sensitivity. , 2006, ACS chemical biology.

[6]  H. Dyson,et al.  Structure of the Escherichia coli quorum sensing protein SdiA: activation of the folding switch by acyl homoserine lactones. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  Yinping Qin,et al.  Quorum‐sensing signal binding results in dimerization of TraR and its release from membranes into the cytoplasm , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[8]  E. P. Greenberg,et al.  Reversible Acyl-Homoserine Lactone Binding to Purified Vibrio fischeri LuxR Protein , 2004, Journal of bacteriology.

[9]  B. Bassler,et al.  Quorum sensing in bacteria. , 2001, Annual review of microbiology.

[10]  N. Moran,et al.  The evolutionary history of quorum-sensing systems in bacteria. , 2004, Molecular biology and evolution.

[11]  J. Ninio Kinetic amplification of enzyme discrimination. , 1975, Biochimie.

[12]  E. Greenberg,et al.  Regulation of gene expression by cell-to-cell communication: acyl-homoserine lactone quorum sensing. , 2001, Annual review of genetics.

[13]  E. Greenberg,et al.  Promoter specificity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum sensing revealed by DNA binding of purified LasR. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Hong Qian,et al.  Reducing intrinsic biochemical noise in cells and its thermodynamic limit. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  Nicolas E. Buchler,et al.  Nonlinear protein degradation and the function of genetic circuits. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Jared R. Leadbetter,et al.  Dual selection enhances the signaling specificity of a variant of the quorum-sensing transcriptional activator LuxR , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[17]  Ron Weiss,et al.  Engineered bidirectional communication mediates a consensus in a microbial biofilm consortium , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  S. C. Winans,et al.  Direct binding of the quorum sensing regulator CepR of Burkholderia cenocepacia to two target promoters in vitro , 2005, Molecular microbiology.

[19]  Jared R. Leadbetter,et al.  Directed evolution of Vibrio fischeri LuxR for increased sensitivity to a broad spectrum of acyl‐homoserine lactones , 2004, Molecular microbiology.

[20]  B. Ahmer,et al.  Detection of Other Microbial Species by Salmonella: Expression of the SdiA Regulon , 2003, Journal of bacteriology.

[21]  Guang Yao,et al.  Sensing and Integration of Erk and PI3K Signals by Myc , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[22]  William E Bentley,et al.  Quorum sensing and bacterial cross-talk in biotechnology. , 2004, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[23]  J. Hopfield Kinetic proofreading: a new mechanism for reducing errors in biosynthetic processes requiring high specificity. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  K. Juárez,et al.  Mechanism of Pseudomonas aeruginosa RhlR Transcriptional Regulation of the rhlAB Promoter , 2003, Journal of bacteriology.

[25]  G. Salmond,et al.  Integration of the quorum‐sensing system in the regulatory networks controlling virulence factor synthesis in Erwinia chrysanthemi , 1998, Molecular microbiology.

[26]  M Welch,et al.  N‐acyl homoserine lactone binding to the CarR receptor determines quorum‐sensing specificity in Erwinia , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[27]  S. Quake,et al.  Long-Term Monitoring of Bacteria Undergoing Programmed Population Control in a Microchemostat , 2005, Science.

[28]  J. Collins,et al.  Programmable cells: interfacing natural and engineered gene networks. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Mat E. Barnet,et al.  A synthetic Escherichia coli predator–prey ecosystem , 2008, Molecular systems biology.

[30]  T. McKeithan,et al.  Kinetic proofreading in T-cell receptor signal transduction. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  P. Swain,et al.  The role of proofreading in signal transduction specificity. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[32]  Yu Tanouchi,et al.  Noise Reduction by Diffusional Dissipation in a Minimal Quorum Sensing Motif , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[33]  S. C. Winans,et al.  Autoinducer binding by the quorum-sensing regulator TraR increases affinity for target promoters in vitro and decreases TraR turnover rates in whole cells. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  S. Basu,et al.  A synthetic multicellular system for programmed pattern formation , 2005, Nature.

[35]  B. Ahmer,et al.  SdiA of Salmonella enterica Is a LuxR Homolog That Detects Mixed Microbial Communities , 2001, Journal of bacteriology.

[36]  S. C. Winans,et al.  Amino-Terminal Protein Fusions to the TraR Quorum-Sensing Transcription Factor Enhance Protein Stability and Autoinducer-Independent Activity , 2005, Journal of bacteriology.

[37]  M. Magnasco,et al.  A kinetic proofreading mechanism for disentanglement of DNA by topoisomerases , 1999, Nature.

[38]  S. Castang,et al.  Direct Evidence for the Modulation of the Activity of the Erwinia chrysanthemi Quorum-sensing Regulator ExpR by Acylhomoserine Lactone Pheromone* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[39]  R. Bazzo,et al.  Molecular Insights into Quorum Sensing in the Human Pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa from the Structure of the Virulence Regulator LasR Bound to Its Autoinducer* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[40]  S. C. Winans,et al.  Site‐directed mutagenesis of a LuxR‐type quorum‐sensing transcription factor: alteration of autoinducer specificity , 2003, Molecular microbiology.

[41]  M. Sebaihia,et al.  Carbapenem antibiotic production in Erwinia carotovora is regulated by CarR, a homologue of the LuxR transcriptional activator. , 1995, Microbiology.

[42]  B. Bassler,et al.  Quorum sensing: cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. , 2005, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[43]  E. Greenberg,et al.  Census and consensus in bacterial ecosystems: the LuxR-LuxI family of quorum-sensing transcriptional regulators. , 1996, Annual review of microbiology.