Evaluation of lactic acid as an initial and secondary subprimal intervention for Escherichia coli O157:H7, non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli, and a nonpathogenic E. coli surrogate for E. coli O157:H7.

Lactic acid can reduce microbial contamination on beef carcass surfaces when used as a food safety intervention, but effectiveness when applied to the surface of chilled beef subprimal sections is not well documented. Studies characterizing bacterial reduction on subprimals after lactic acid treatment would be useful for validations of hazard analysis critical control point (HACCP) systems. The objective of this study was to validate initial use of lactic acid as a subprimal intervention during beef fabrication followed by a secondary application to vacuum-packaged product that was applied at industry operating parameters. Chilled beef subprimal sections (100 cm(2)) were either left uninoculated or were inoculated with 6 log CFU/cm(2) of a 5-strain mixture of Escherichia coli O157:H7, a 12-strain mixture of non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC), or a 5-strain mixture of nonpathogenic (biotype I) E. coli that are considered surrogates for E. coli O157:H7. Uninoculated and inoculated subprimal sections received only an initial or an initial and a second "rework" application of lactic acid in a custombuilt spray cabinet at 1 of 16 application parameters. After the initial spray, total inoculum counts were reduced from 6.0 log CFU/cm(2) to 3.6, 4.4, and 4.4 log CFU/cm(2) for the E. coli surrogates, E. coli O157:H7, and non-O157 STEC inoculation groups, respectively. After the second (rework) application, total inoculum counts were 2.6, 3.2, and 3.6 log CFU/cm(2) for the E. coli surrogates, E. coli O157:H7, and non-O157 STEC inoculation groups, respectively. Both the initial and secondary lactic acid treatments effectively reduced counts of pathogenic and nonpathogenic strains of E. coli and natural microflora on beef subprimals. These data will be useful to the meat industry as part of the HACCP validation process.

[1]  K E Belk,et al.  Decontamination of beef subprimal cuts intended for blade tenderization or moisture enhancement. , 2007, Journal of food protection.

[2]  J. Dickson,et al.  Identification of Escherichia coli O157:H7 meat processing indicators for fresh meat through comparison of the effects of selected antimicrobial interventions. , 2005, Journal of food protection.

[3]  J. Dickson,et al.  Evaluation of Escherichia coli biotype 1 as a surrogate for Escherichia coli O157:H7 for cooking, fermentation, freezing, and refrigerated storage in meat processes. , 2009, Journal of food protection.

[4]  M. Tamplin,et al.  Effects of temperature and salinity on the survival of Vibrio vulnificus in seawater and shellfish , 1993, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[5]  J. Sofos,et al.  Escherichia coli O 157 : H 7 Strains That Persist in Feedlot Cattle Are Genetically Related and Demonstrate an Enhanced Ability To Adhere to Intestinal Epithelial Cells , 2009 .

[6]  C. Gill,et al.  Assessment of the adequacy of cleaning of equipment used for breaking beef carcasses. , 1999, International journal of food microbiology.

[7]  S. Palumbo Is Refrigeration Enough to Restrain Foodborne Pathogens? , 1986, Journal of food protection.

[8]  J. O. Reagan,et al.  Microbial populations on animal hides and beef carcasses at different stages of slaughter in plants employing multiple-sequential interventions for decontamination. , 2000, Journal of food protection.

[9]  C. Gill,et al.  Contamination of beef chucks with Escherichia coli during carcass breaking. , 2001, Journal of food protection.

[10]  Washington,et al.  Parameters for determining inoculated pack/challenge study protocols. , 2010, Journal of food protection.

[11]  J. Sofos,et al.  Escherichia coli O157:H7 Strains That Persist in Feedlot Cattle Are Genetically Related and Demonstrate an Enhanced Ability To Adhere to Intestinal Epithelial Cells , 2009, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.