Training peripheral vision to read: Reducing crowding through an adaptive training method

Reading is slow and difficult for people with central vision loss who must rely on their peripheral vision. It has been shown that practicing on a letter-recognition task can increase peripheral reading speed, and that the training-related improvement is attributable mainly to reduced crowding. Since there is a high degree of variability in the vision conditions across people with central vision loss, a one-size-fits-all training protocol may not be adequate or appropriate for these patients. In this study, we target two aspects of training-training task and individual customization, and propose a training paradigm that focuses on reducing crowding and tailors training for each individual using an adaptive method. Seven normally-sighted adults were trained with four daily sessions of identifying crowded letters presented at various positions 10° below fixation in a pre/post design. During the training, a dynamic cue (jitter motion) was applied to target letters to modulate crowding. Amplitude of motion was varied on a block by block basis according to individual performance to maintain task difficulty near a pre-defined level (80% accuracy in letter recognition). We found that motion amplitude gradually reduced as training progressed, indicating a reduction in crowding. Following training, reading speed (measured using RSVP method) showed a significant improvement in both the trained (49%) and untrained (50%) visual fields. Despite showing similar improvement as observed in the previous training studies, our adaptive training method demands less effort and, most importantly, offers customization for each individual trainee.

[1]  Susana T. L. Chung Improving reading speed for people with central vision loss through perceptual learning. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Letter-recognition and reading speed in peripheral vision benefit from perceptual learning , 2004, Vision Research.

[3]  Jörgen Gustafsson,et al.  Dynamic Stimulus Presentation Facilitates Peripheral Resolution Acuity , 2013 .

[4]  J. Mcdowd,et al.  The effects of age and extended practice on divided attention performance. , 1986, Journal of gerontology.

[5]  Deyue Yu,et al.  Sensory factors limiting horizontal and vertical visual span for letter recognition. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[6]  C. Frennesson,et al.  Patients with AMD and a large absolute central scotoma can be trained successfully to use eccentric viewing, as demonstrated in a scanning laser ophthalmoscope , 2003, Vision Research.

[7]  R A Schuchard,et al.  Relative locations of macular scotomas near the PRL: effect on low vision reading. , 1999, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[8]  Jesse S. Husk,et al.  The effect of motion on crowding: zooming text. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[9]  Deyue Yu,et al.  Sensory and cognitive influences on the training-related improvement of reading speed in peripheral vision. , 2013, Journal of Vision.

[10]  Deyue Yu,et al.  Effects of Temporal Modulation on Crowding, Visual Span, and Reading , 2016, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[11]  Sing-Hang Cheung,et al.  The case for the visual span as a sensory bottleneck in reading. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[12]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Development of a training protocol to improve reading performance in peripheral vision , 2010, Vision Research.

[13]  Timothy McMahon,et al.  Eye-movement training for reading in patients with age-related macular degeneration. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[14]  Christoph Ehlken,et al.  Therapeutic interference with EphrinB2 signalling inhibits oxygen‐induced angioproliferative retinopathy , 2011, Acta ophthalmologica.

[15]  Deyue Yu Jiggling the crowding away: improving letter recognition in peripheral vision , 2012 .

[16]  D G Pelli,et al.  Pixel independence: measuring spatial interactions on a CRT display. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[17]  G. Legge,et al.  Functional and cortical adaptations to central vision loss , 2005, Visual Neuroscience.

[18]  Gordon E Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading XX. Linking letter recognition to reading speed in central and peripheral vision , 2001, Vision Research.

[19]  S. Yantis,et al.  Visual motion and attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Training peripheral vision to read: Boosting the speed of letter processing , 2017, Vision Research.

[21]  Susana T. L. Chung,et al.  Reading speed in the peripheral visual field of older adults: Does it benefit from perceptual learning? , 2010, Vision Research.

[22]  Susana T. L. Chung,et al.  Learning to identify crowded letters: Does it improve reading speed? , 2007, Vision Research.

[23]  Allison B. Sekuler,et al.  Age related differences in learning with the useful field of view , 2006, Vision Research.

[24]  Roger W Li,et al.  Prolonged Perceptual Learning of Positional Acuity in Adult Amblyopia: Perceptual Template Retuning Dynamics , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Sheng He,et al.  Locating the cortical bottleneck for slow reading in peripheral vision. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[26]  Hye-Won Lee,et al.  Training improves reading speed in peripheral vision: is it due to attention? , 2010, Journal of vision.

[27]  R. Schuchard,et al.  Preferred retinal loci relationship to macular scotomas in a low-vision population. , 1997, Ophthalmology.

[28]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[29]  S. Hochstein,et al.  The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading—II. Low vision , 1985, Vision Research.

[31]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  ECVP '07 Abstracts , 2007, Perception.

[32]  Cynthia Owsley,et al.  Characteristics of low-vision rehabilitation services in the United States. , 2009, Archives of ophthalmology.

[33]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading. XVIII. The effect of print size on reading speed in normal peripheral vision , 1998, Vision Research.

[34]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  The Functional Form of Performance Improvements in Perceptual Learning , 2007, Psychological science.

[35]  Esther G González,et al.  Plasticity of fixation in patients with central vision loss , 2009, Visual Neuroscience.

[36]  N. Fogt,et al.  The Effect of Experience on the Detection of Small Eye Movements , 2000, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[37]  Nhung X Nguyen,et al.  Training to improve reading speed in patients with juvenile macular dystrophy: a randomized study comparing two training methods , 2011, Acta ophthalmologica.

[38]  E. Faye,et al.  Clinical Low Vision , 1976 .

[39]  E Peli,et al.  Scrolled and rapid serial visual presentation texts are read at similar rates by the visually impaired. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[40]  John R. Anderson Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications , 1980 .

[41]  Janette Atkinson,et al.  High-density VERPs to global form and motion in adults and infants , 2007 .

[42]  Patricia Grant,et al.  Reading rehabilitation of individuals with AMD: relative effectiveness of training approaches. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[43]  Alex R Bowers,et al.  Short-Term In-Office Practice Improves Reading Performance with Stand Magnifiers for People with AMD , 2005, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[44]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[45]  S. Hochstein,et al.  Task difficulty and the specificity of perceptual learning , 1997, Nature.